Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
03 December 2018 | Story Charlene Stanley | Photo Charlene Stanley
Prof Helena Strauss
Prof Helena van Zyl, Director of the UFS Business School, says the accreditation endorses their important role in empowering business leaders.

The Business School of the University of the Free State (UFS) received an International Qualifications Assessment accreditation by the Central and East European Management Development Association (CEEMAN) this week.
 
“This is an endorsement for the level of quality and relevance of the Business School. I’ve been inundated with well-wishes via phone and emails from current and former students. They all realise the tremendous benefits this holds for everyone affiliated with our Business School, as the quality of our qualifications are now recognised globally,” says Prof Helena Van Zyl, Director of the UFS Business School.

“On behalf of the executive management, I would like to congratulate Prof Van Zyl and her team on this fine achievement. The accreditation is a feather in the cap of the university and it is indeed an accomplishment to be proud of,” says Prof Francis Petersen, Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS.
  
CEEMAN is an international management-development association with the aim of accelerating the growth in quality of management development in Central and Eastern Europe. The association has more than 220 members from over 55 countries in Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.

Thorough evaluation process

The accreditation is the culmination of two years of hard work – first to apply by submitting an overview of operations, then drawing up a self-assessment report with appendices of over 1 000 pages. Finally, a peer-review team with panel members from Latvia, Poland, and Mauritius came to the Bloemfontein Campus for an on-site assessment. In two and a half days, the panel conducted detailed, thorough interviews with 85 different people – from staff and students, to industry partners, the dean, and members of the rectorate.
    
Aspects which the panel focused on included the school’s mission and strategic focus, legal status and governance, research output, physical facilities, financial viability, contribution to the local community, use of technology, and even how environmental needs are met.

“It’s been an incredibly intense but very rewarding experience,” says Prof Van Zyl. “The review team was very professional and strategic in their approach and also gave valuable input and advice.” 

Team members were particularly impressed by the overwhelmingly positive experiences recorded by students, as well as the state-of-the-art facilities.

Passionate about people

“We think of ourselves as a ‘Boutique Business School’ ”, explains Prof Van Zyl. “We are focused on quality and are extremely structured and disciplined, which ultimately creates a safety net for students and staff. We’re also small enough to build personal relationships with our students.”

She believes this to be the secret of the Business School’s tremendous success record over the 20 years of its existence.

“We are passionate about people and believe in creating a caring environment for them while they’re here.”  

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept