Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
12 November 2019 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Leonie Bolleurs
Farmovs
At a first for South Africa, the SACRA clinical trials capacity-building workshop with government, research institutions, and industry, were from the left: Dr Nathaniel Mofolo, Dr Rita Nathan, Dr Mojalefa Maseloa (Head: Clinical Services in the Clinical Unit at the Universitas Hospital) and Sue Baily (Site Management Head at IQVIA).

Whether it is to treat the flu or a more serious illness, all medicines go through a very costly and lengthy research process before being approved for prescription to patients. The cumulative time from the beginning of trials to marketing approval has increased over the past ten years. 

According to Dr Vathi Papu-Zamxaka from the South African Clinical Research Association (SACRA), South Africans would not have had access to safe and effective medicines, had it not been for the intensive research conducted on new medicines. 

On 7 November 2019, a group of 115 delegates representing the Free State Department of Health, the UFS, private research sites, and the pharmaceutical industry met at FARMOVS on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS) for the SACRA clinical trials capacity-building workshop.

2,1 billion dollars to develop one successful drug

Dr Michelle Middle, Chief Medical Officer at FARMOVS, provided some interesting stats on the process for drugs to hit the shelves: “One out of 10 drugs entering human research will be approved. The cost of development of one successful drug is approximately 2,1 billion dollars. And the time to develop a drug, from submission of the Investigational New Drug Application (IND) to approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is between 12 and 15 years.”

Dr Middle stated that drug development is one of the most regulated processes, with ethics and patient safety governing the undertaking. “With SAHPRA (South African Health Products Regulatory Agency) having some of the strictest regulations in the world, South Africa has a good history of running trials.  In addition, fast growth is expected for the pharmaceutical market on the African continent, necessitating the need for increased clinical trials on this continent,” she said. 

Very few clinical trials hosted in South Africa 

Although Africa has the broadest genetic variability of all human populations and carries 17% of the global population, very few clinical trials are hosted on the continent. Globally, there are currently approximately 322 000 clinical trials being actively conducted, of which only 1 700 are conducted in Africa, i.e. less than 3%.  Even worse, only 304 of the 1 700 trials running in Africa are conducted in South Africa.  There is thus a critical need for South Africa as a country to market itself as a clinical trial destination and to attract more trials to the country.

South Africa’s competitive edge lies in being known for its ICH (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use)-compliant top-quality research, racial and genetic diverse trial participants, good medical infrastructure and expertise, and the good reputation of the regulator (SAHPRA). “There are, however, a need for transformation and capacity building in clinical research in the country,” said Dr Middle. 

Dr Rita Nathan, Head of Clinical Services in the Clinical Department at the Universitas Hospital, who was representing government at the workshop, is looking to strengthen clinical trials across government and industry by focusing on, among others, funding models, operations management, and service delivery. 

From the UFS Faculty of Health Sciences, Dr Nathaniel Mofolo, Head of the School of Clinical Medicine, said collaboration between stakeholders is important. “This initiative is giving direction to the UFS vision of being a research-led university.” 

Other topics discussed at the workshop include the clinical trials landscape, how clinical trials work, the patient factor, ethics in clinical trials, and the economic aspect of clinical trials. 

News Archive

Symbolism and naming in spotlight at NSSA conference
2016-10-06

Description: NSSA LN Read More Tags: NSSA LN Read More

From the left, front: Prof Nhlanhla Mathonsi,
President of the NSSA, and Prof Thenjiwe Meyiwa,
Registrar at DUT.
Left, back (from the UFS): Prof Peter Raper,
Research Fellow at the ULFE and executive
member of the scientific council and paper
selection committee, Prof Theodorus du Plessis,
Director of the Unit for Language Facilitation
and Empowerment, and JC van der Merwe,
acting Director of the Institute for
Reconciliation and Social Justice.
Photo: Supplied

The 19th Names Society of Southern Africa (NSSA) International Conference saw delegates from around the world make their way to the University of the Free State (UFS) Bloemfontein Campus to study names as well as naming systems.

The conference took place from 20 to 22 September and was organised by the Unit for Language Facilitation and Empowerment (ULFE) at the UFS, alongside the NSSA. Delegates from South Africa, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Germany, and Taiwan attended.

The NSSA is a society dedicated to the study of names, naming, and naming systems. Members of the society come from a variety of disciplines, but all share an interest in names and their meaning.

Symbolism and naming in public sphere

The topic of this year’s conference was Symbolism and Instrumentality in Naming with categories of research which included anthroponyms, geographical names, names in history, literary onomastics, brand names, and politics of naming in a public sphere.

Issue of gender in naming systems

Keynote speakers included Prof Thenjiwe Meyiwa, Registrar at the Durban University of Technology (DUT), and Prof Peter Raper, Professor Extraordinaire at the UFS, Research Fellow at the ULFE, and executive member of the scientific council and paper selection committee.

In her address entitled, Naming is to gender as gender is to naming: Emerging Onomastics Scholarship, Prof Meyiwa noted that analysing names using gender enquiry is a potentially useful tool for identifying various communities’ values, belief systems, and perceptions as it relates to sexes.

“The talk called for the development of what I refer to as ‘feminist onomastics theory and research practice,’ which should primarily seek to bring about change and/or reimagine onomastics research."

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept