Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
12 November 2019 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Leonie Bolleurs
Farmovs
At a first for South Africa, the SACRA clinical trials capacity-building workshop with government, research institutions, and industry, were from the left: Dr Nathaniel Mofolo, Dr Rita Nathan, Dr Mojalefa Maseloa (Head: Clinical Services in the Clinical Unit at the Universitas Hospital) and Sue Baily (Site Management Head at IQVIA).

Whether it is to treat the flu or a more serious illness, all medicines go through a very costly and lengthy research process before being approved for prescription to patients. The cumulative time from the beginning of trials to marketing approval has increased over the past ten years. 

According to Dr Vathi Papu-Zamxaka from the South African Clinical Research Association (SACRA), South Africans would not have had access to safe and effective medicines, had it not been for the intensive research conducted on new medicines. 

On 7 November 2019, a group of 115 delegates representing the Free State Department of Health, the UFS, private research sites, and the pharmaceutical industry met at FARMOVS on the Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS) for the SACRA clinical trials capacity-building workshop.

2,1 billion dollars to develop one successful drug

Dr Michelle Middle, Chief Medical Officer at FARMOVS, provided some interesting stats on the process for drugs to hit the shelves: “One out of 10 drugs entering human research will be approved. The cost of development of one successful drug is approximately 2,1 billion dollars. And the time to develop a drug, from submission of the Investigational New Drug Application (IND) to approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is between 12 and 15 years.”

Dr Middle stated that drug development is one of the most regulated processes, with ethics and patient safety governing the undertaking. “With SAHPRA (South African Health Products Regulatory Agency) having some of the strictest regulations in the world, South Africa has a good history of running trials.  In addition, fast growth is expected for the pharmaceutical market on the African continent, necessitating the need for increased clinical trials on this continent,” she said. 

Very few clinical trials hosted in South Africa 

Although Africa has the broadest genetic variability of all human populations and carries 17% of the global population, very few clinical trials are hosted on the continent. Globally, there are currently approximately 322 000 clinical trials being actively conducted, of which only 1 700 are conducted in Africa, i.e. less than 3%.  Even worse, only 304 of the 1 700 trials running in Africa are conducted in South Africa.  There is thus a critical need for South Africa as a country to market itself as a clinical trial destination and to attract more trials to the country.

South Africa’s competitive edge lies in being known for its ICH (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use)-compliant top-quality research, racial and genetic diverse trial participants, good medical infrastructure and expertise, and the good reputation of the regulator (SAHPRA). “There are, however, a need for transformation and capacity building in clinical research in the country,” said Dr Middle. 

Dr Rita Nathan, Head of Clinical Services in the Clinical Department at the Universitas Hospital, who was representing government at the workshop, is looking to strengthen clinical trials across government and industry by focusing on, among others, funding models, operations management, and service delivery. 

From the UFS Faculty of Health Sciences, Dr Nathaniel Mofolo, Head of the School of Clinical Medicine, said collaboration between stakeholders is important. “This initiative is giving direction to the UFS vision of being a research-led university.” 

Other topics discussed at the workshop include the clinical trials landscape, how clinical trials work, the patient factor, ethics in clinical trials, and the economic aspect of clinical trials. 

News Archive

R2,5 million received from FNB Fund for Universal Access and Disability Support
2017-10-18

Description: FNB CUADS Funding Tags: FNB CUADS Funding
Tinotenda Magaya (left at the back), Robert Shoba and
Manus van Rooyen are some of the CUADS students
who will benefit from the money donated by the FNB Fund.
In front are Martie Miranda (left), Head of CUADS, and
Thandeka Rantsi from the FNB Fund.
Photo: Jóhann Thormählen

Funding isn’t only about giving money to provide access to education. There are many factors that contribute to the successful completion of studies, and this is even more applicable to students with disabilities. 

That is why the FNB Fund decided to continue and further its relationship with the Center for Universal Access and Disability Support (CUADS) at the University of the Free State (UFS). The fund recently donated nearly R2.5 million for 2017, 2018, and 2019 to CUADS in order to assist students with tuition fees, study material, accommodation and supportive devices. 

A total of 11 students will benefit from the R 2 497 440. The UFS previously received R200 000 (2014), R238 000 (2015), and R192 500 (2016) from the FNB Fund.

“The FNB Fund would like to take it
a step further and not only provide
access in terms of funding, but also
provide all the support that
students require to be able
to complete their studies.”

Funders should be aware of challenges

“The FNB Fund would like to take it a step further and not only provide access in terms of funding, but also provide all the necessary support that students require to be able to complete their studies,” says Thandeka Rantsi from the FNB Fund.

The fund also partners with disability units from the University of Stellenbosch, the University of the Western Cape, and the University of Cape Town.

Rantsi says funders should be aware of the challenges students with disabilities face in order to provide the right support as their challenges are more extensive.

More flexible funding than others

Martie Miranda, Head of CUADS, says they are very grateful. “In comparison with other funding, this funding provides more flexibility. Because of the gap between government funding and students’ needs, there are always students who fall out of the criteria for the NSFAS bursary. Then the FNB funding comes in very handy.”

According to her, government funding is never enough. She says the FNB funding enables them to address specific needs such as equipment, accommodation etc. as they have more leeway than prescribed NSFAS amounts.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept