Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
29 April 2020 | Story Andre Damons | Photo Supplied
Intubation training on a manikin (Doctors from Department of Anaesthesiology).

The Department of Anaesthesiology at the University of the Free State, in collaboration with the Clinical Simulation and Skills Unit, has trained almost 500 hospital staff members dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic since the lockdown started.

The unit assisted doctors, nurses, and staff working at the Universitas and Pelonomi hospitals with training in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including protective clothing, masks, gloves, aprons, and eye protection. The training started the week of 16 March and was led by Prof Gillian Lamacraft, Head of the Pain Control Unit in the Department of Anaesthesiology, and registrars in the Department of Anaesthesiology. Training was not only limited to healthcare workers in hospital wards designated for COVID-19-positive or suspected COVID-19 patients, but workers throughout the hospital received training, lest they be required to care for COVID-19-positive patients in the future, especially if there is an increase in the cases being treated in the hospital.

Training members of the anaesthesia department
According to Prof Lamacraft, the training was initially started to ensure that members of the anaesthesia department would be protected if the need arose for them to wear PPE while treating a COVID-19 patient. Members of the anaesthesia department are not routinely involved in the medical care of patients with serious infectious disease (e.g. Ebola virus), and because they were not previously required to wear PPE regularly, they are not familiar with its use. 
“Internationally, the healthcare workers most exposed to the virus appear to be the ones most at risk of dying, presumably owing to the greater viral load they receive. COVID-19 patients who are severely ill, may require intubation so they can be ventilated – this procedure puts the doctor performing it very close to the airway of the patient, and greatly at risk of being contaminated with COVID 19 during this procedure.” 

“Failure to intubate the patient successfully can lead to the rapid demise of the patient, so it has been decided as hospital policy that anaesthetists will preferably be the doctors performing these intubations, if they are available, as they are considered the doctors best at this procedure. Therefore, anaesthetists will be a group of doctors in the hospital at great risk of COVID virus exposure,” says Prof Lamacraft.

Training other healthcare workers
To facilitate this training, registrars in the Department of Anaesthesiology made videos to demonstrate the donning (putting on) and doffing (taking off) procedure for PPE. Members of the Universitas Academic Hospital’s Infection Control Team provided them with the required information and assessed the training videos for correctness.

The department used the Clinical Simulation and Skills Unit’s facilities at the university to conduct this training, so that the participants could also physically practise putting on and taking off the PPE after watching the videos. 

“Since then, we have been doing this training every working day. Having trained our department, the members of the COVID-19 task team for the Universitas Hospital asked us to train other healthcare workers at the hospital. Accordingly, we have trained many other healthcare workers (over 430 for PPE training alone), including heads of department, professors of medicine, specialists, registrars, medical officers, interns, all ranks of nursing staff, clinical technologists, and household aids.”

The different types of PPE
Prof Lamacraft says it is important that all these healthcare workers are taught the different types of PPE (i.e. standard and aerosol-generating procedure PPE (AGP PPE). In particular, they had to understand that a special type of mask, an N95 mask, should only be used for AGP PPE, as these are in extremely short supply internationally. 

“Many healthcare workers did not know how to put these on correctly, or which size to wear – this had the potential for wastage of this precious commodity. Taking off PPE contaminated with the COVID-19 virus is a very risky procedure. Failure to do so correctly, can lead to not only the healthcare worker contaminating themselves (e.g. by touching their eyes or face while taking off their masks), but also to the contamination of the healthcare workers assisting the person in taking off their PPE; or even to the participant taking home the virus on their bodies and contaminating their family at home. Therefore, the healthcare workers had to be shown how to take off their PPE without contaminating themselves.”
In order to reduce the risk of trainers and other participants being infected during training by healthcare workers who are asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19, only two to four participants have been trained at a time and strict rules were kept regarding social distancing and the use of hand sanitiser.

The training is essential to protect healthcare workers
Prof Mathys Labuschagne, Head: Clinical Simulation and Skills Unit, says volunteering doctors and nurses are also trained to work in ICUs with COVID-19 patients. The ICU department trained these volunteers in the use of ventilators, to assist with putting up drips and lines, intubation, and PPE. The goal is to train healthcare providers to assist in ICU when needed. 

“This training is essential to train and prepare healthcare workers when the patient numbers are increasing. The training is also essential to protect the healthcare workers against infection, because we need them to stay healthy to be able to manage the patients,” according to Prof Labuschagne.

Dr Edwin Turton from the Department of Anaesthesiology says the training is for frontline healthcare workers (nurses, cleaners, porters, doctors, and even washers from theatre) who need to protect themselves in order to protect their patients and all other staff helping them to care for the patients.

“Doctors and nurses need different forms or levels of PPE for working in the clinical environment, and we need them to train to wear appropriate PPE for AGP and contact with PUI and positive patients. They need to be able to protect themselves. The training is for all healthcare workers and not only for doctors and nurses,” says Dr Turton.

News Archive

Is milk really so well-known, asks UFS’s Prof. Osthoff
2011-03-17

Prof. Garry Osthoff
Photo: Stephen Collett

Prof. Garry Osthoff opened a whole new world of milk to the audience in his inaugural lecture, Milk: the well-known (?) food, in our Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences.

Prof. Osthoff has done his research in protein chemistry, immuno-chemistry and enzymology at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in Pretoria and post-doctoral research at the Bowman-Grey School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA. That was instrumental in establishing food chemistry at the university.
 
He is involved in chemical aspects of food, with a focus on dairy science and technology. He is also involved in the research of cheese processing as well as milk evolution and concentrated on milk evolution in his lecture. Knowledge of milk from dairy animals alone does not provide all the explanations of milk as food.
 
Some aspects he highlighted in his lecture were that milk is the first food to be utilised by young mammals and that it is custom-designed for each species. “However, mankind is an opportunist and has found ways of easy access to food by the practice of agriculture, where plants as well as animals were employed or rather exploited,” he said.
 
The cow is the best-known milk producer, but environmental conditions forced man to select other animals. In spite of breeding selection, cattle seem not to have adapted to the most extreme conditions such as high altitudes with sub-freezing temperatures, deserts and marshes.
 
Prof. Osthoff said the consumption of the milk as an adult is not natural; neither is the consumption of milk across species. This practice of mankind may often have consequences, when signs of malnutrition or diseases are noticed. Two common problems are an allergy to milk and lactose intolerance.
 
Allergies are normally the result of an immune response of the consumer to the foreign proteins found in the milk. In some cases it might help to switch from one milk source to another, such as switching from cow’s milk to goat’s milk.
 
Prof. Osthoff said lactose intolerance – the inability of adult humans to digest lactose, the milk sugar – is natural, as adults lose that ability to digest lactose. The symptoms of the condition are stomach cramps and diarrhoea. This problem is mainly found in the warmer climates of the world. This could be an indication of early passive development of dairy technology. In these regions milk could not be stored in its fresh form, but in a fermented form, in which case the lactose was pre-digested by micro-organisms, and the human population never adapted to digesting lactose in adulthood.
 
According to Prof. Osthoff, it is basically the lactose in milk that has spurred dairy technology. Its fermentation has resulted in the development of yoghurts and all the cheeses that we know. In turn, the intolerance to lactose has spurred a further technological solution: lactose-free milk is currently produced by pre-digestion of lactose with enzymes.
 
It was realised that the milks and products from different species differed in quality aspects such as keeping properties and taste. It was also realised that the nutritional properties differed as well as their effects on health. One example is the mentioned allergy against cow’s milk proteins, which may be solved by the consumption of goat’s milk. The nutritional benefits and technological processing of milk aroused an interest in more information, and it was realised that the information gained from human milk and that of the few domesticated species do not provide a complete explanation of the properties of milk as food. Of the 250 species of milk which have been studied, only the milk of humans and a few domesticated dairy animals has been studied in detail.

Media Release
15 March 2011
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Director: Strategic Communication
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: news@ufs.ac.za

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept