Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
28 April 2021 | Story Prof Francis Petersen | Photo Sonia Small (Kaleidoscope Studios)
Prof Francis Petersen is Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the University of the Free State (UFS).

You should have seen it coming. In the wake of the recent student protests and resulting suspension of tuition on some higher education campuses throughout the country, management teams from public universities have become used to having this bit of stinging criticism levelled against us from various fronts. 

You should have seen it coming. 

And the implied add-on: You could have done something to stop it.

But as with most crises, foreseeing something and preventing it are often worlds apart. 
That much we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. For decades preceding 2020, health scientists and a large section of the informed public had known that the world’s next big health crisis would probably be caused by some variant of the coronavirus. Yet “seeing it coming” could not prevent an eventual outbreak.

In the same way that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed fault lines in the global health system, student protests continue to expose fault lines in our higher education funding model. 

The unfortunate truth is that no single institution’s foresight and ameliorative measures can prevent the outbreak of symptoms of a deeper systemic problem that needs to be addressed in a comprehensive, sustainable way and on a national level.  

Complicating the access challenge

In a post-COVID-19 landscape, it is even more challenging to find solutions for students’ very legitimate demands for access to education. Here at the beginning of 2021, we find ourselves in a fragile society ravaged by illness, loss, fear and uncertainty and reeling from the lingering effects of sweeping economic blows.

It is more important than ever to keep the wellbeing and future of an entire society in mind when making decisions affecting individuals.

It is equally vital to be guided by principles of social justice in every decision, striking a careful balance between different rights. In our case: The right to demonstrate versus the right to safety and protection of property; and the right to education of those wanting to enter an institution versus the rights of those already studying within that institution.

The need to look beyond one’s own rights and also consider the rights of others is aptly reflected in the masked faces we see around us nowadays. A face mask ultimately offers greater protection to bystanders than to the individual wearing it. This attitude of always considering the “greater good” should more than ever guide our decisions in all spheres of society.

And here universities have a continued vital role to play: To not only equip graduates with skills and knowledge, but to help create responsible citizens with a wider vision than just the immediate. 

Current financial model unsustainable

It is clear that the current model of student funding in South Africa is simply unsustainable. 

Student numbers rise each year, as does inflation. Household incomes are not keeping up, leading to more and more families who will qualify for the subsidised free higher education for households with a combined annual income of R350 000 or less, announced by former president Jacob Zuma four years ago. 

Add to that the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that has placed tremendous extra pressure on the fiscus, plus the apparent challenges that the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) experiences in administering student bursaries, and it becomes clear that government simply will not be able to sustain these financial commitments going forward.

Short term vs sustainable solutions 

It is also clear that government’s reaction to this year’s student protest dilemma, i.e. re-allocating funds originally earmarked for other areas within higher education, was a short-term solution. Continued measures like these will, in the long term, only lead to the steady deterioration of the very institutions these students are trying to access.

Likewise, a cancellation of students’ so-called “historical debt” (at the moment adding up to around R14 billion) will have a devastating effect on South Africa’s higher education institutions. .  

Once again, a well-considered balancing of interests is required – facilitating access to higher education while at the same time ensuring the sustainability of institutions.

Tackling change together

We live in a time where, on different fronts, courage is needed to do things differently.  
When it comes to finding a new financial solution for higher education, we should think beyond a mere tinkering of existing models, tweaking it here and there, and rather consider total transformation.

One of the models that show great potential is the income-contingent loan scheme, whereby students start paying loans back once they have secured a regular income, with specific parameters in place to ensure sustainability. 

But regardless of what model is chosen to replace the status quo, one thing is certain:
it will require a combined effort and commitment from government, higher education institutions as well as the private sector. 

At a time when there is a great emphasis on distancing, there needs to be a huddling and a clustering on another level.  We all need to take hands and move closer together to find solutions for a problem that ultimately affects all of us.

It is abundantly clear that there is an urgent need for significant private sector involvement, not only from potential financers like banks and pension funds, but by all potential future employers in all business sectors.

Ultimately, both public and private sectors are key beneficiaries of the output of universities. The students we deliver represent their future work force. This vested interest should translate into active involvement – not only at the point where students exit our institutions, but also ensuring that they’re able to enter them in the first place.

This is why the National Task team that Dr Blade Nzimande, Minister of Higher Education, Science and Technology wants to establish to address the student funding challenge is so crucial – and should, at least include role players from all three sectors. 

Focus on social justice during Freedom Month

South Africans are currently celebrating our freedom, commemorating our departure from inequality and oppression.  

Maybe this Freedom Month – and particularly Freedom Day – is a time to reflect not only on what makes us free but on what binds us together. A time to build new relationships based on common needs and shared interests and values.  

We have moved away from oppression. We should now move towards greater co-operation and voluntary, mutually beneficial alliances in order to truly ensure access to education for all.

Because if we don’t, student protests will remain as consistent as seasonal flu, characterising the beginning of each academic year.

News Archive

Leader of Bafokeng nation delivers a guest lecture at UFS
2011-05-05

 
Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi, leader of the Royal Bafokeng, Proff. Teuns Verschoor, Vice-Rector: Institutional Affairs, Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor and Rector of our university, and Hendri Kroukamp, Dean of our Faculty Economic and Management Sciences (acting).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi, leader of the Royal Bafokeng nation, asked the pertinent questions: Who decides our fate as South Africans? Who owns our future? in the JN Boshoff Memorial Lecture at our university.

He said: “It’s striking that today, with all the additional freedoms and protections available to us, we have lost much of the pioneering spirit of our ancestors. In this era of democracy and capitalist growth (systems based on choice, accountability, and competition), we nevertheless invest government with extraordinary responsibility for our welfare, livelihoods, and even our happiness. We seem to feel that government should not only reconcile and regulate us, but also house us, school us, heal us, employ us, even feed us.

“And what government can’t do, the private sector will. Create more jobs, invest in social development and the environment, bring technical innovations to our society, make us part of the global village. But in forfeiting so much authority over our lives and our society to the public and private sectors, I believe we have given away something essential to our progress as people and a nation: the fundamental responsibility we bear for shaping our future according to aims, objectives, and standards determined by us.”

He shared the turnaround of the education system in the 45 schools in the 23 communities of the Bafokeng nation and the effect of greater community, NGOs, the church and other concerned parties’ engagement in the curricula and activities with the audience. School attendance improved from 80% to 90% in two years and the top learners in the matric maths in Northwest were from the Bafokeng nation. 

Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi stressed the need for people to help to make South Africa a better place: “As a country, we speak often of the need for leadership, the loss of principles, a decline in values. But too few of us are willing to accept the risk, the expense, the liability, and sometimes even the blame, that accompanies attempting to make things better. We are trying to address pressing issues we face as a community, in partnership with government, and with the tools and resources available to us as a traditionally governed community. It goes without saying that we can and should play a role in deciding our fate as members of this great country, and in the Royal Bafokeng Nation, as small as it is, we are determined to own our own future.”

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept