Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
03 August 2021 | Story André Damons | Photo Charl Devenish
Elandré Williams is an analyst in the South African Doping Control Laboratory (SADoCoL), which is housed by the University of the Free State (UFS), and she is primarily responsible for all analyses and method development conducted by the GC-C-IRMS. She believes there are opportunities for more women to contribute to the ever-changing field of science and research. She is also part of the team responsible for all analytical work regarding the analysis of anabolic steroids by GC-MS/MS.

Diversity in the scientific community is of the utmost importance and it is important to know that the inclusion of women in science is inevitable. Women have done so much for the scientific community, and as time goes by, the impact of women in science will become greater, creating more opportunities for other women to come. 

This is according to Mrs Elandré Williams, analyst in the South African Doping Control Laboratory (SADoCoL), housed by the University of the Free State (UFS). Williams, who is primarily responsible for analyses and method development conducted by the GC-C-IRMS, believes there are opportunities for more women to contribute to the ever-changing field of science and research. She is also part of the team responsible for all analytical work regarding the analysis of anabolic steroids by GC-MS/MS.

Possibilities for women as scientists and researchers

“When I look at our field of expertise in the anti-doping community, there are a lot of possibilities for women as scientists and researchers to contribute to the science; the number of women in the laboratories is growing, again taking it back to our laboratory employees, consisting mainly of women scientists.” 

“Young women now have the ability and opportunities to study science, to do research, and to participate in scientific innovations. Scientific laboratories are encouraged to offer positions for women, which can contribute to the empowerment of young women and to encourage women to pursue a career in science,” says Williams. 

Having to find your own way in a scientific community that was once led by men only, can still be challenging at times, but, says Williams, even though women are climbing the ladder quickly, both women and men today still use the science that was once developed by men. This science is now evolving and changed by women. “It is an honour to be a female scientist and to know that the efforts and achievements of our scientific work and excellence will hopefully one day also benefit other women as scientists.”

Making a contribution to the Olympic Games

With the Olympic Games taking place this year, Williams and her colleagues are at the forefront of making a positive contribution to the Games as an anti-doping laboratory. Says Williams: “It is an honour to be a part of something that has a positive impact on sport, as well as something as big as the Olympics. Although the pressure of an Olympic year brought about several challenges, it taught me how to work well under pressure and made me aware of the kind of pressure I can work in.” 

According to her, her first Olympic year at SADoCoL made her realise that the more she does, the more she can do. It is, however, says Williams, not an individual goal, but a combined goal of the SADoCoL team to ensure that they make a positive contribution.  

What challenges do women still face?

Williams believes that women in the 21st century have more opportunities than in previous decades. “In the era we live in, women advocating for women are seen more often and it will remain this way if all women in all areas of life and careers continue to stand up for what they believe in and continue to influence other women in their professional careers. 

“Sexism is one of the biggest challenges facing women in society. Women are excluded from positions that hold power, they are unable to express their concerns, and are also unable to contribute to the authority that mostly men have. Young women are also faced with difficulties when making career choices due to the lack of information and available career opportunities that they can pursue,” says Williams.

These challenges can be addressed by simply realising the impact and role that women play in our society and all over the world. According to Williams, women should be introduced to leadership positions and should be given equal opportunities as men. 

“I do believe that if every person acknowledges the real worth of the person next to them, whatever gender, equality will be established in the near future. Women have become more than just housewives and ‘moms’; in fact, women, just as men, have an incredible force inside them that will be remembered forever if they are given the chance to showcase their capabilities and talents.”  

Science has helped to shape her

“Although these challenges might not be resolved quickly, I do believe that we as women have the power to overcome it, but it begins with us, all women today, to ensure that we leave a positive change in the world for the women coming after us.”

Williams concludes by saying that science – for which you need certain values, such as honesty, courage, being meticulous – helped to shape her into who she is today. “It taught me so much through challenging times where I had the option to either ‘jump in at the deep end and swim’ or drown’; I opted to ‘swim’, and this is a decision that I make every day, and I give it my utmost best. It has shown me what I am capable of and so much more – what I can achieve in the future.”

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept