Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
11 February 2022 | Story Nonsindiso Qwabe | Photo Stephen Collett
Prof Francis Petersen, Rector and Vice-Chancellor shared his vision for 2022 during the Official Opening on Friday 11 February 2022.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented an opportunity to rethink and re-imagine higher education, and how the University of Free State in particular, can contribute towards a more inclusive, cohesive, fairer, and sustainable future. Prof Francis Petersen, UFS Rector and Vice-Chancellor, addressed staff in his official opening speech on the Bloemfontein Campus on Friday 11 February 2022.

The engaged university of the future is one that enjoys academic freedom and institutional autonomy while engaging with the communities it serves, he said.

“We must be enquiry-driven, and at the same time be learning- and community-focused.  We must be professionally attuned, but humanely informed, taking our global responsibilities seriously.”

Reflecting on the pandemic years

Prof Petersen said the resilience shown by staff and students alike during the immensely challenging years of the COVID-19 pandemic was impressive. The key focus for 2021 was to ensure the successful completion of the academic year without leaving any student or staff member behind.

Some successes for 2021 include:
• The undergraduate student success rate increased by close to 5%.
• Improvements in student success, staff development, and quality assurance.
• Infrastructure developments are on track.
• Institutional governance is in place.
The following are either already completed or nearing completion:
• Digitalisation Plan for the institution
• Flexible Human Resources model
• Revised Internationalisation approach
• Multi-Campus Management Model
• Collaboration and co-creation with different sectors of the economy (Centre for Digital Futures)
The seven Vice-Chancellor (VC) Projects have been completed and are now mainstreamed in the normal business of the university.

“Against the background of the UFS Strategic Plan (2018-2022), the Integrated Transformation Plan (which was revised through a mid-term review), seven VC’s Strategic Projects, the Institutional Multi-Stakeholder Group, and the Institutional Risk Register, the focus of 2021 was on ‘delivery and on re-imaging what is possible and doing it’ – and I can say that we have achieved much!” Prof Petersen shared.

Leading the way

“We have increased the number of NRF-rated researchers, our researchers have demonstrated excellence in various areas, achieved international recognition for these efforts, and participated in international research and funding consortia,” Prof Petersen said.

In relation to student governance and well-being, much has been achieved. Faculty councils have been established, student representation has been increased in most of the governance structures at the university, student safety (on and off campus) has received much attention, and policies and guidelines related to protest, discipline, engagement, and student wellness were finalised and are being implemented.

Setting the pace for the year ahead

The UFS Strategy (2018-2022) will end this year, and Prof Petersen said the process of engaging on the design of a new vision and strategic plan for the university as from 2023 has started. The development of a new vision and strategic plan for the university will be fully consultative. 

“The focus of the vision will be on: Visibility and Impact. The vision, and subsequently the strategic plan, will be framed by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. I can assure you that we will continue with engagement in a sphere of respect and tolerance for different views – always focusing on fairness and social justice.”

“We will ensure that diversity in all its facets is fully implemented at the UFS,” he said.

In closing, Prof Petersen said the university will be taking on an outward focus and will be looking for opportunities to project its strength and capabilities to the outside world.

News Archive

Heart diseases a time bomb in Africa, says UFS expert
2010-05-17

 Prof. Francis Smit

There are a lot of cardiac problems in Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa is home to the largest population of rheumatic heart disease patients in the world and therefore hosts the largest rheumatic heart valve population in the world. They are more than one million, compared to 33 000 in the whole of the industrialised world, says Prof. Francis Smit, Head of the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery at the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS).

He delivered an inaugural lecture on the topic Cardiothoracic Surgery: Complex simplicity, or simple complexity?

“We are also sitting on a time bomb of ischemic heart disease with the WHO (World Health Organisation) estimating that CAD (coronary artery disease) will become the number-one killer in our region by 2020. HIV/Aids is expected to go down to number 7.”

Very little is done about it. There is neither a clear nor coordinated programme to address this expected epidemic and CAD is regarded as an expensive disease, confined to Caucasians in the industrialised world. “We are ignoring alarming statistics about incidences of adult obesity, diabetes and endemic hypertension in our black population and a rising incidence of coronary artery interventions and incidents in our indigenous population,” Prof. Smit says.

Outside South Africa – with 44 units – very few units (about seven) perform low volumes of basic cardiac surgery. The South African units at all academic institutions are under severe threat and about 70% of cardiac procedures are performed in the private sector.

He says the main challenge in Africa has become sustainability, which needs to be addressed through education. Cardiothoracic surgery must become part of everyday surgery in Africa through alternative education programmes. That will make this specialty relevant at all levels of healthcare and it must be involved in resource allocation to medicine in general and cardiothoracic surgery specifically.

The African surgeon should make the maximum impact at the lowest possible cost to as many people in a society as possible. “Our training in fields like intensive care and insight into pulmonology, gastroenterology and cardiology give us the possibility of expanding our roles in African medicine. We must also remember that we are trained physicians as well.

“Should people die or suffer tremendously while we can train a group of surgical specialists or retraining general surgeons to expand our impact on cardiothoracic disease in Africa using available technology maybe more creatively? We have made great progress in establishing an African School for Cardiothoracic Surgery.”

Prof. Smit also highlighted the role of the annual Hannes Meyer National Registrar Symposium that culminated in having an eight-strong international panel sponsored by the ICC of EACTS to present a scientific course as well as advanced surgical techniques in conjunction with the Hannes Meyer Symposium in 2010.

Prof. Smit says South Africa is fast becoming the driving force in cardiothoracic surgery in Africa. South Africa is the only country that has the knowledge, technology and skills base to act as the springboard for the development of cardiothoracic surgery in Africa.

South Africa, however, is experiencing its own problems. Mortality has doubled in the years from 1997 to 2005 and half the population in the Free State dies between 40 to 44 years of age.

“If we do not need health professionals to determine the quality and quantity of service delivery to the population and do not want to involve them in this process, we can get rid of them, but then the political leaders making that decision must accept responsibility for the clinical outcomes and life expectancies of their fellow citizens.

“We surely cannot expect to impose the same medical legal principles on professionals working in unsafe hospitals and who have complained and made authorities aware of these conditions than upon those working in functional institutions. Either fixes the institutions or indemnifies medical personnel working in these conditions and defends the decision publicly.

“Why do I have to choose the three out of four patients that cannot have a lifesaving operation and will have to die on their own while the system pretends to deliver treatment to all?”

Prof. Smit says developing a service package with guidelines in the public domain will go a long way towards addressing this issue. It is also about time that we have to admit that things are simply not the same. Standards are deteriorating and training outcomes are or will be affected.

The people who make decisions that affect healthcare service delivery and outcomes, the quality of training platforms and research, in a word, the future of South African medicine, firstly need rules and boundaries. He also suggested that maybe the government should develop health policy in the public domain and then outsource healthcare delivery to people who can actually deliver including thousands of experts employed but ignored by the State at present.

“It is time that we all have to accept our responsibilities at all levels… and act decisively on matters that will determine the quality and quantity of medical care for this and future generations in South Africa and Africa. Time is running out,” Prof. Smit says.
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept