Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
28 March 2022 | Story André Damons | Photo Supplied
Digtal Futures
Some of those who attended the meeting are, from left at the back,: Dr Vic Coetzee, Senior Director: Information and Communication Technology Services at the UFS; Prof Corli Witthuhn, Vice-Rector: Research and Internationalisation at the UFS; Herkulaas Combrink, data and medical scientist in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences; Prof Katinka de Wet, medical sociologist in the Department of Sociology (UFS); Dr RS Mokoena (UFS/FSDOH) public healthcare specialist, department of community health, and Bandile Ntombela, Director ICT at the FSDOH. In front is Elke de Wet, (Deputy Director: Internal Communication), Mondli Mvambi, (Head of Communication and spokesperson: FSDOH); and P Monyobo, office of the Deputy Director General, Clinical Health Services, Free State Department of Health.

Interdisciplinary collaborations between experts, departments, entities and government are of vital importance for the digital future in order to respond to societal needs and answer important questions that might impact the wellbeing of communities. 

This was one of the messages from the first meeting between the Interdisciplinary Centre for Digital Futures (ICDF) at the University of the Free State (UFS) and the Free State Department of Health (FSDOH) – as an important stakeholder. The meeting was to inform the FSDOH about the Centre and its workings, and to start strategic conversations around projects on the horizon. 

The ICDF was established in 2021 under the guidance of Prof Francis Petersen, Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, and Prof Phillipe Burger, Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at the UFS. For the past year, Prof Katinka de Wet, medical sociologist in the Department of Sociology at the UFS, and Herkulaas Combrink, data and medical scientist in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, have been the interim co-directors of the ICDF – driving its projects and implementing the vision. 

ICDF wants to work in partnerships

Prof De Wet said one of the aims of the ICDF is to work in partnership with industry, communities and government thereby co-creating a fully immersed digital future where the world of “the digital” becomes accessible and useful to a wide range of agents. According to her, the UFS aims to create the development and application of expertise in both social scientific and technical competencies of the digital in all its various forms through the functioning of the ICDF. The ICDF wants to take a lead in creating this immersed and socially responsive and relevant digital future. 

“At the UFS, like everywhere in the world, we have to engage with everything digital and the so-called 4IR, because it is inevitably going to touch all aspects of our lives. We’ve got a good track record of previous engagements with the Free State Department of Health and would like to take it further. It is important for us to get input from the government, private sector, and the community because everything digital touches on so many things of all of our lives. 

“From a university point of view, it is extremely important to understand that we cannot do this in a meaningful way, if we don’t engage with it from an interdisciplinary point of view. Interdisciplinary is the way to go, it is the future on how we broach difficult and relevant questions. If we are not doing this, we are not doing what we are supposed to do to respond to pressing social needs,” said Prof de Wet.

Combrink said to make this happen, the ICDF has a few working groups, all of which are developed in-house. One of these working groups is the Ethics and Governance group and has two conveners in Dr Michael Pienaar, senior lecturer and specialist in the department of Paediatrics and Child Health, and Dr Susan Brokensha, a social linguist and researcher and a senior lecturer in Humanities. The other working groups in the ICDF are focused on the Digital Backbone, convened by Dr Martin Clark, lecturer in the department of Geology – which works in close collaboration with other departments on campus including the eResearch group within ICT, led by Mr Albert van Eck. The two remaining groups have been focusing on building and innovating projects in Digital Health, Agriculture and Education. 

Excited about the future of the Centre 

Dr Vic Coetzee, Senior Director: Information and Communication Technology Services at the UFS said he is excited about the future of the Centre of which ITC is an important part of. “I am excited for the reason that it’s a new development and because we are bringing in dimensions never used by the university. I think where we are going globally, we can collectively be market leaders in South Africa in this regard and that excites me.”

Mondli Mvambi, head of communications at the FSDOH, said this is a unique platform. He added: “When we saw this opportunity, it answered one of our long-standing questions of how do we get real information and data out there to the people so that in a state of a pandemic they are able to take timely decisions to save lives.” 

His colleague, Bandile Ntombela, Director ICT at the FSDOH, said the gradual transition from going from a traditional IT outfit to really delivering health through digital health, has been keeping them busy over the past few years and going forward. He is therefore inspired by the ICDF to bring everyone together for some of the challenges in digital health. 
In her closing remarks, Prof Corli Witthuhn, Vice-Rector: Research and Internationalisation, said she is excited about the new Centre and thinks there is a lot of opportunity to capitalise on. According to her, the interdisciplinarity is stimulating and that the research, the direction the Centre needs to go, as well as seeing various areas working together, holds a lot of potential. Prof Witthuhn said that through these endeavours, she hopes for a long-term partnership rather than a short-term relationship with the FSDOH.   

News Archive

Game farming a lens to analyse challenges facing democratic SA – Dr Kamuti
2017-05-30

 Description: Dr Kamuti Tags: Dr Kamuti

Dr Tariro Kamuti, Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre
for Africa Studies at the University of the Free State.
Photo: Rulanzen Martin

One of the challenges facing South Africa’s developing game farming policy is the fractured state in the governance of the private game farming sector, says Dr Tariro Kamuti.

Dr Kamuti, a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Centre for Africa Studies (CAS) at the University of the Free State (UFS), was presenting a seminar on Wednesday 17 May 2017 under the topic, Private Wildlife Governance in a Context of Radical Uncertainty: Challenges of South Africa’s Developing Game Farming Policy, which takes material from his PhD. He received his PhD from both the Vrije University in Amsterdam and the UFS in 2016.

His presentation explored how the private game industry positions itself in accordance with existing agricultural and environmental regulations. It also investigated the state’s response to the challenge of competing needs over land and wildlife resources which is posed by the gaming sector. “The transformation of the institutional processes mediating governance of the private game farming sector has been a long and enduring arrangement emerging organically over time,” Dr Kamuti said.

Game farming links wildlife and agricultural sectors
“I decided on this topic to highlight that game farming links the wildlife sector (associated with conservation and tourism) and the agricultural sector. Both make use of land whose resources need to be sustainably utilised to meet a broad spectrum of needs for the diverse South African population.

“The continuous skewed ownership of land post-1994 justifies questioning of the role of the state in confronting challenges of social justice and transformation within the economy.”

“Game farming can thus be viewed as a lens through which to study the broad challenges facing a democratic South Africa, and to interrogate the regulatory and policy framework in the agricultural and wildlife sectors at their interface,” Dr Kamuti said.

Challenges facing game farming policies

The state alone does not apply itself to the regulation of private gaming as a sector. “There is no clear direction on the position of private game farming at the interface of environmental and agricultural regulations, hence game farmers take advantage of loopholes in these institutional arrangements to forge ahead,” Dr Kamuti said.

He further went on to say that the state lacked a coherent plan for the South African countryside, “as shown by the outstanding land restitution and labour tenant claims on privately owned land earmarked for wildlife production”.

The South African government was confronted with a context in which the status quo of the prosperity of the middle classes under neoliberal policies was pitted against the urgent need to improve the material well-being of the majority poor.  Unless such issues were addressed, this necessarily undermined democracy as a participatory social force, Dr Kamuti said.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept