Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
30 January 2024 Photo SUPPLIED
Prof Frank Zachos
Prof Frank Zachos, an Affiliated Professor in the Department of Genetics, participated in a study on the genetic diversity of species published in the prestigious Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Early this year, an article examining the monitoring of genetic diversity in Europe – indicating which countries are doing it, for which and for how many species – was published in the prestigious Nature Ecology & Evolution. Prof Frank Zachos, an Affiliated Professor in the Department of Genetics at the University of the Free State (UFS) in Bloemfontein, South Africa, participated in this study, which was co-conducted by 52 scientists representing 60 universities and research institutes from 31 countries.

According to Prof Zachos, who is also a scientist and curator of mammals at the Natural History Museum in Vienna in Austria – one of the world’s largest natural history museums with more than 30 million specimens – genetic diversity is crucial for species to adapt to climate change.

Genetic diversity key to species survival

Genetic diversity is one of the keys to species survival. He points out that in 2022, the International Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has placed increased emphasis on the need to protect the genetic diversity found in wild species – a fundamental component of biological diversity that has been generally neglected in the past.

Prof Zachos explains that global warming is already putting pressure on many species in Europe and elsewhere, particularly those with populations at the climatic limits of their range. These populations are not only at risk of extinction, but also tend to carry genetic variants favoured by natural selection for survival in challenging environments. “These ecologically peripheral regions may, therefore, function as reservoirs from which, through gene flow, adaptive variants can spread into populations of the core range that will be affected by climate change later. This increases the overall resilience of species,” he says. 

He emphasises that analysing genetic diversity and its changes over time in populations located in areas with challenging environmental conditions is especially important for conservation.

Better monitoring of species needed

In a statement, he mentions that this study reveals that current efforts to monitor genetic diversity in Europe are incomplete and insufficient.

According to the new study, more efforts are necessary, particularly in the southeast of Europe (Turkey and the Balkans), as this region is underrepresented, but at the same time strongly affected by climate change, possibly harbouring many reservoir populations that can adapt well to the challenges posed by environmental shifts.

Prof Zachos adds that monitoring efforts were significantly biased towards certain taxonomic groups, as they have found many monitoring projects targeting large carnivores such as brown bears and wolves, iconic species that are also of political relevance.

He explains that they will, however, be less affected by climate change than, for example, amphibians and many tree species. “Yet, the latter are only rarely included in genetic monitoring projects,” says Prof Zachos, who is of the opinion that a monitoring strategy with less geographic and taxonomic bias, along with systematic targeting of full environmental gradients and high-biodiversity regions, would be an important contribution towards the protection of threatened species – many of which also provide invaluable services to humans, such as crop pollination or pest control.

Better support for ecosystem conservation

He holds the view that this is not only restricted to Europe, but applies globally, especially in superdiverse regions such as Southern Africa.

Prof Zachos states that, considering recent agreements aimed at halting biodiversity decline – of which South Africa is a signatory country – the study also points out the urgent need for improved international monitoring of species, and especially their genetic diversity. “This will facilitate better land-use planning and support for ecosystem conservation and restoration actions, ensuring the survival of species and the services they provide,” he says.

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept