Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
30 January 2024 Photo SUPPLIED
Prof Frank Zachos
Prof Frank Zachos, an Affiliated Professor in the Department of Genetics, participated in a study on the genetic diversity of species published in the prestigious Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Early this year, an article examining the monitoring of genetic diversity in Europe – indicating which countries are doing it, for which and for how many species – was published in the prestigious Nature Ecology & Evolution. Prof Frank Zachos, an Affiliated Professor in the Department of Genetics at the University of the Free State (UFS) in Bloemfontein, South Africa, participated in this study, which was co-conducted by 52 scientists representing 60 universities and research institutes from 31 countries.

According to Prof Zachos, who is also a scientist and curator of mammals at the Natural History Museum in Vienna in Austria – one of the world’s largest natural history museums with more than 30 million specimens – genetic diversity is crucial for species to adapt to climate change.

Genetic diversity key to species survival

Genetic diversity is one of the keys to species survival. He points out that in 2022, the International Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has placed increased emphasis on the need to protect the genetic diversity found in wild species – a fundamental component of biological diversity that has been generally neglected in the past.

Prof Zachos explains that global warming is already putting pressure on many species in Europe and elsewhere, particularly those with populations at the climatic limits of their range. These populations are not only at risk of extinction, but also tend to carry genetic variants favoured by natural selection for survival in challenging environments. “These ecologically peripheral regions may, therefore, function as reservoirs from which, through gene flow, adaptive variants can spread into populations of the core range that will be affected by climate change later. This increases the overall resilience of species,” he says. 

He emphasises that analysing genetic diversity and its changes over time in populations located in areas with challenging environmental conditions is especially important for conservation.

Better monitoring of species needed

In a statement, he mentions that this study reveals that current efforts to monitor genetic diversity in Europe are incomplete and insufficient.

According to the new study, more efforts are necessary, particularly in the southeast of Europe (Turkey and the Balkans), as this region is underrepresented, but at the same time strongly affected by climate change, possibly harbouring many reservoir populations that can adapt well to the challenges posed by environmental shifts.

Prof Zachos adds that monitoring efforts were significantly biased towards certain taxonomic groups, as they have found many monitoring projects targeting large carnivores such as brown bears and wolves, iconic species that are also of political relevance.

He explains that they will, however, be less affected by climate change than, for example, amphibians and many tree species. “Yet, the latter are only rarely included in genetic monitoring projects,” says Prof Zachos, who is of the opinion that a monitoring strategy with less geographic and taxonomic bias, along with systematic targeting of full environmental gradients and high-biodiversity regions, would be an important contribution towards the protection of threatened species – many of which also provide invaluable services to humans, such as crop pollination or pest control.

Better support for ecosystem conservation

He holds the view that this is not only restricted to Europe, but applies globally, especially in superdiverse regions such as Southern Africa.

Prof Zachos states that, considering recent agreements aimed at halting biodiversity decline – of which South Africa is a signatory country – the study also points out the urgent need for improved international monitoring of species, and especially their genetic diversity. “This will facilitate better land-use planning and support for ecosystem conservation and restoration actions, ensuring the survival of species and the services they provide,” he says.

News Archive

Q and A with Prof Hussein Solomon on ‘Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism in Africa’
2015-05-29

 

Political Science lecturer, Prof Hussein Solomon, has launched his latest book, Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism in Africa: fighting insurgency from Al Shabaab, Ansar Dine and Boko Haram, on Wednesday 26 May 2015 at the UFS.

In his book, Solomon talks about the growing terrorist threat in Africa, with the likes of Al Shabaab, Ansar Dine, and Boko Haram exploiting Africa's vulnerabilities to expand their operations. Explaining both the limitations of current counter-terrorist strategies and possible future improvements, this timely study can be appreciated by scholars and practitioners alike.

Q: If you speak of Al Shabaab, Ansar Dine, and Boko Haram expanding operations, do you see possibilities for their expansion even into South Africa, or is expansion mainly focused on northern African countries?
 
A: All three movements are operating out of their respective countries. Al Shabaab has attacked Kenya and Uganda and tried to attack the 2010 Soccer World Cup in South Africa. So yes, there is a danger that they are here and, more importantly, newer groups like ISIS are recruiting in SA already.
 
Q: If the traditional military response is ineffective, what would be a better approach then?

 
A:
What is important is that the force of arms needs to complement the force of ideas. What is being waged is an ideological battle, and, just as the West defeated Communism ideologically in the Cold War, we need to defeat radical Islamism ideologically. In addition, the military response needs to complement the governance and development responses.
 
Q: External players like the US have insufficient knowledge of the context, what would be the knowledge about context necessary for anyone concerned about the terror problem in Africa?
 
A: Allow me to give you some examples. The US trains African militaries to fight terrorist groups, but, when they return to their countries, they stage a coup and topple the civilian government. The US does not seem to understand that arming a predatory military and training them makes them more predatory and brutal, which results in civilians being recruited by terrorists, as happened in Mali. Similarly, the US sent arms to the Somali government, and members of that government sold those arms to Al Shabaab terrorists, the very people they were supposed to fight. So the Americans do not understand the criminalisation of the African state, which undermines good governance and promotes terrorism.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept