Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
12 May 2021 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied
Wilku Meyer is the co-recipient of the Junior Captain Scott Memorial Medal for Plant Sciences, awarded every second year by the South African Academy for Science and Arts for the best MSc dissertation awarded at a South African university.

In 2016, sunflower rust was very prominent, causing trouble in the agricultural industry. With the latest information on this topic published as far back as the 1990s, Wilku Meyer, PhD Botany student at the University of the Free State (UFS), saw the gap in research and decided to make sunflower rust the focus of his master’s dissertation. 

“After seeing the work researchers are doing in the Department of Plant Sciences at the UFS and how it can be applied, it was reassuring to know that the work you are doing can, in addition to broadening your own horizons, also help other people,” says Meyer. 

Not only will his research one day possibly make a positive difference in the agriculture sector, but he has also received acknowledgement for this work from the prestigious body, the South African Academy for Science and Arts

Best MSc dissertation in Plant Sciences

With his dissertation: ‘Phenotypic and genotypic variation of Puccinia helianthi in South Africa’, Meyer is the co-recipient of the Junior Captain Scott Memorial Medal for Plant Sciences, awarded every second year by the South African Academy for Science and Arts for the best MSc dissertation awarded at a South African university. Ruan van der Nest from the Stellenbosch University Department of Agronomy shared the award with him. 

The focus of his dissertation was to see how many different races of the Puccinia helianthi fungus are responsible for sunflower rust. He explains: “I followed two approaches to this, namely the phenotypic approach whereby specific sunflower lines are infected with spores of different Puccinia helianthi isolates collected from sunflower fields in South Africa. With the second approach, the genotypic approach, I looked at the DNA of collected rust samples and compared them with each other.” 

In the end, he was able to identify six races in total that were spread across four main genetic groups.

Meyer did not settle for subpar results and kept going, no matter how much work it was, or the time required. He put all his time and effort into this study. He believes that the guidance of his supervisors and the support of his family and friends also helped with this big achievement.

Hard-working, dependable, and mature researcher

Prof Botma Visser (Botany), one of Meyer’s supervisors during his master’s study, describes him as hard-working, dependable, and a mature researcher. According to Prof Visser, the one attribute that will benefit him with his PhD, is his computer skills, especially in the field of Bioinformatics. “This is becoming an important skill set for postgraduate students, whereby huge datasets generated with the newest DNA sequencing technologies are analysed to provide next-generation results and understanding the interactions between a plant and a pathogen.” 

“Finally, and maybe his best quality, is that he really loves what he is currently doing – from the practical hands-on work in the greenhouse, to the laboratory and computer-based molecular analyses of the plant pathogen,” adds Prof Visser. 

Meyer, in response to the award from the South African Academy for Science and Arts, says it is an honour. “I'm very grateful that all the time and effort is being recognised. It is a confirmation that I'm doing what I should be doing.”

He started his PhD study this year (2021), again under the supervision of Prof Botma Visser and Prof Willem Boshoff (Plant Pathology). 

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept