03 August 2026
|
Story Siqhamo Hlubi Jama
|
Photo Lunga Luthuli
Prof Peter Rosseel, Managing Director of MCR Consulting and Visiting Professor at KU Leuven, delivers a guest lecture on digital transformation and AI at the University of the Free State Business School Auditorium.
The question was deceptively simple. What does it mean for an organisation to be future-ready? Not future-facing, not digitally aware, not in the process of transformation, but genuinely, operationally, culturally ready for a world being reshaped at speed by digital technology and artificial intelligence.
The University of the Free State
Business School invited
Prof Peter Rosseel to answer this. What followed was a ninety-minute lecture that moved between strategy, leadership, culture, and the human dimensions of technological disruption.
Prof Rosseel is Managing Director of MCR Consulting – a KU Leuven spinoff – and a visiting professor within University Administration and Central Services at KU Leuven in Belgium. His work spans strategy implementation, change management, digital and cultural transformation, and organisational learning – a portfolio that has taken him across biomedical sciences, criminology, psychology, education, engineering, and economic and management sciences, as well as into extensive global consulting engagements. His particular concern is with how leadership teams navigate continuous disruption by integrating vision, culture, and values into the way organisations operate.
"Future-ready companies have both great customer experience and operational efficiency," Prof Rosseel told the audience. Such organisations, he explained, innovate to satisfy customer needs and reduce costs at the same time. They provide seamless journeys for customers regardless of the channel they use, and they treat data as a strategic asset accessible to everyone in the business.
Digital transformation is not a technology problem
Prof Rosseel was direct about where his interest lies. He was equally direct about where it does not. "If you're sitting here and you want me to help you with technical details on AI and digital transformation, may I ask you to leave the room now, because it's not going to go for me," he said. His work, he explained, is about "how leadership teams make the right decisions regarding the use and implementation of digital transformation and AI, and how they can take the organisation with them on that journey."
"The technology part is the easy part," he told the audience. "The leadership part and the decision-making part at the leadership team level are the difficult parts."
He illustrated the point with an anecdote about his own arrival at the university, where a malfunctioning staff access badge became tangled in mismatched passport numbers, lost files, and forms shuffled between institutional systems before it could be resolved. The frustration, he argued, was not really about a badge. "This is not the problem of AI," he said. "It's your problem." Poor customer experience and operational inefficiency, in other words, are organisational failures long before they become technological failures.
A recurring theme in Prof Rosseel's practice is the gap between digital investment and digital impact. Organisations that treat AI and digital tools as technical acquisitions (systems to be procured and installed) tend to find that the expected transformation does not follow. The technology arrives. The culture does not shift. The strategy remains on paper. The people are not carried along.
Prof Rosseel drew a sharp distinction between change and transformation. "Change is a better strategy, better structure, better processes, better system," he said, describing the rational, operational side of organisational life. Transformation, by contrast, is about culture, which he defined plainly: "Culture is the sum of the individual behaviour of people in an organisation." That distinction, he argued, is why so many digital initiatives stall: "I cannot introduce technology or digital transformation in my organisation if I don't have the right culture."
What ‘future-ready’ requires
Drawing on research from MIT, Prof Rosseel outlined four states an organisation can occupy: siloed and fragmented (‘silos and spaghetti’); an integrated customer experience; industrialised operations; or fully future-ready, where strong customer experience and operational efficiency coexist. Organisations can reach that top-right position by different routes, he said, but rarely by a smooth one. "There are, every time, explosions when you move from one [stage] to the other," he told the audience. These are friction points around decision-making rights, new ways of working, and organisational structure. Far from being a warning sign, he argued, these moments of difficulty are evidence of real progress: "If you don't have these explosions, you're not moving in the right direction."
For Prof Rosseel, the capacity to navigate disruption is not primarily about having the right tools. It is a matter of having the right orientation: towards learning, towards adaptation, towards the kind of values-driven leadership that can hold an organisation steady while the conditions around it change rapidly.
That orientation, he told the audience, starts with recognising what actually motivates people inside organisations. "Learning is the biggest motivator for people in organisations, not money," he said. "The question is, how do we as leaders ignite that passion for learning? That is the job of leaders." His closing challenge to those in the room was just as direct: "Your job as a leader is to take people out of their comfort zone."
The lecture was hosted by the University of the Free State Business School, part of the
Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, and held at the Business School Auditorium on the Bloemfontein Campus. It forms part of the school's commitment to bringing international expertise into conversation with the challenges facing South African organisations and leaders.