Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
11 December 2019 | Story Leonie Bolleurs
Aids read more

According to Global Statistics, there were approximately 37,9 million people across the globe with HIV/Aids in 2018. They also state that in 2018, an estimated 1,7 million individuals worldwide became newly infected with HIV. 

In the city of Masvingo, Zimbabwe, Claris Shoko is a Statistics lecturer at the Great Zimbabwe University. In her PhD thesis at the University of the Free State (UFS) in the Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, she presented the argument that the inclusion of both the CD4 cell count and the viral-load counts in the monitoring and management of HIV+ patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART), is helping in reducing mortality rates, leading to improved life expectancy for HIV/Aids patients. 

She received her doctoral degree at the December UFS Graduation Ceremonies, with her thesis: Continuous-time Markov modelling of the effects of treatment regimens on HIV/Aids immunology and virology. 

CD4 cell count and viral-load count

Dr Shoko explains: “When the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) enters the human body, the virus attacks the CD4 cells in their blood. This process damages CD4 cells, causing the number of white blood cells in the body to drop, making it difficult to fight infections.”

“Clinical markers such as CD4 cell count and viral-load count (number of HIV particles in a ml of blood) provide information about the progression of HIV/Aids in infected individuals. These markers fully define the immunology and the virology of HIV-infected individuals, thereby giving us a clear picture of how HIV/Aids evolve within an individual.”

Dr Shoko continues: “The development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has helped substantially to reduce the death rate from HIV. HAART reduces viral load-count levels, blocking replication of HIV particles in the blood, resulting in an increase of CD4 cell counts and the life expectancy of individuals infected with HIV. This has made CD4 cell counts and viral-load counts the fundamental laboratory markers that are regularly used for patient management, in addition to predicting HIV/Aids disease progression or treatment outcomes.”

In the treatment of HIV/Aids, medical practitioners prescribe combination therapy to attack the virus at different stages of its life cycle, and medication to treat the opportunistic infections that may occur. “The introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has led to the dramatic reduction in morbidity and mortality at both individual level and population level,” states Dr Shoko.

Once HIV-positive patients are put on cART, the effectiveness of treatment is monitored after the first three months and a further follow-up is done every six months thereafter. During the monitoring stages, CD4 cell count and viral load is measured. Patients are also screened for any tuberculosis (TB) co-infection and checked for any signs of drug resistance. These variables determine whether or not there is a need for treatment change. 

She continues: “Previous studies on HIV modelling could not include both CD4 cell count and viral load in one model, because of the collinearity between the two variables. In this study, the principal component approach for the treatment of collinearity between variables is used. Both variables were then included in one model, resulting in a better prediction of mortality than when only one of the variables is used.”

“Viral-load monitoring helps in checking for any possibilities of virologic failure or viral rebound, which increases the rate of mortality if not managed properly. CD4 cell count then comes in to monitor the potential development of opportunistic infections such as TB. TB is extremely fatal, but once detected and treated, the survival of HIV/Aids patients is assured,” Dr Shoko explains.

Markov model

She applied the Markov model in her study. The model, named after the Russian mathematician Andrey Markov, represents a general category of stochastic processes, characterised by six basic attributes: states, stages, actions, rewards, transitions, and constraints. 

According to Dr Shoko, Markov models assume that a patient is always in one of a finite number of discrete states, called Markov states. All events are modelled as transitions from one state to another. Each state is assigned a utility, and the contribution of this utility to the overall prognosis depends on the length of time spent in each state. For example, for a patient who is HIV positive, these states could be HIV+ (CD4 cell count above 200 cells/mm3), Aids (CD4 cell count below 200 cells/mm3) and Dead.

“Markov models are ideal for use in HIV/Aids studies, because they estimate the rate of transition between multiple-disease states while allowing for the possible reversibility of some states,” says Dr Shoko, quoting Hubbard and Zhou.

“Relatively fewer HIV modelling studies include a detailed description of the dynamics of HIV viral load count during stages of HIV disease progression. This could be due to the unavailability of data on viral load, particularly from low- and middle-income countries that have historically relied on monitoring CD4 cell counts for patients on ART because of higher costs of viral load-count testing,” Dr Shoko concludes

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points
2004-07-29

   

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

 

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept