Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
18 October 2019 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Leonie Bolleurs
Human Settlements Conference
Attending the first National Student Conference for Human Settlement students were, from the left: Dr Anita Venter, Lecturer in the Centre for Development Support; Phelani Mkhize, master’s student in Urban and Regional Planning; Prof Maléne Campbell, Head of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the UFS; and Nhlakampho Mahlalela, also a master’s student in Urban and Regional Planning.

“This invitation by the University of the Free State (UFS) comes at a critical moment when we begin to roll up our sleeves in an attempt to transform the lives of our people, and in efforts to modernise our cities and towns to attain sustainable livelihoods.” This was the words of the MEC for Public Works, Infrastructure and Human Settlements, Tshidi Koloi, on attending the first National Student Conference for Human Settlement. 

“The urban population of the world has grown rapidly – from 751 million in 1950 to 8 billion in 2018. How do we plan for rapid urbanisation?” Koloi asked. 

“We turn to the academic world for continuous research in various fields related to the development of human settlements. The role of the university and of this department cannot be overestimated. Clearly, we need to forge partnerships where our department can benefit from ongoing research towards the improvement of its value chain and programmes. In return, government could offer bursaries and internship opportunities for students.”

Integrate communities

More than 130 students from the Nelson Mandela University, the UUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, the University of the Witwatersrand, and the UFS attended the conference to gain a better understanding of the challenges, policies, and practices of human settlements. The conference also allowed students the opportunity to not only engage with key members of government, but also with each other and delegates from the private sector.

Head of the Department of Human Settlements, Tim Mokhesi, said his department’s objective with housing for the future is to integrate communities; not to separate them because they are poor. If we separate communities, our next struggle will be a class struggle. 

“South Africa is in a crisis in terms of human settlement. In the past years, there was an exponential growth in informal settlements – 300 to 3 000 (with 143 in the Free State); the housing budget shrank, and local authorities do not have the capacity to deal with informal settlements. Can the few of us make a sufficient and significant contribution? Seeing your commitment as students is what gives us hope for a better future for all,” Thomas Stewart, Lecturer in the UFS Department of Urban and Regional Planning, said. 

content photo 1
Attending the launch of the new Bachelor of Spatial Planning Honours with specialisation in Human Settlements were, from the left: Thomas
Stewart, Lecturer in the UFS Department of Urban and Re-gional Planning;  Tshidi Koloi,  MEC of Public Works, Infrastructure and
Human Settlements;  and Pura Mgolombane (Dean of Student Affairs at the UFS). (Photo: Leonie Bolleurs)


Innovative and inclusive re-housing

Students experienced two fieldtrips, one to the Hillside View Development Project, where the focus was on mixed housing. This project is part of the Mangaung Metro Municipality’s five-year integrated human settlements plan. According to developer Freddie Kenney, the project needs to be a development model for South Africa to change the picture of social housing. 

The second site visited was the Innovative Housing Building Project: Qala Phelang Tala, where peo-ple are trained to build their own houses. “It is a very easy process,” said Dr Anita Venter, Lecturer in the Centre for Development Support, who is lecturing Human Settlements Theory in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning. Since 2013, she was involved in the building of five houses. 

The latest building project at the Meraka Cultural Village in Roodewal, outside Bloemfontein, is a stu-dent-led project where they learn to develop a basic shelter suitable for survival in a future, post-natural, and climate-crisis world that will become between 2 and 4 degrees Celsius warmer within the next century. “It is important for people to build in climate-friendly ways,” Dr Venter said. 

She continues: “The project seeks to also renew, restore, and revitalise communities.” Sebabatso Mofama, who now helps with training, built this house similar to the one where she comes from in the Eastern Cape. “It is where I feel at home,” she said. 

The human aspect 

Dean of Student Affairs,Pura Mgolombane, touched on the human aspect of human settlements. “We first need to see the human in human settlements. ‘Yebo’, meaning I see you. See the human and develop quality houses.”

The event coincided with the launch of the new Bachelor of Spatial Planning Honours with specialisation in Human Settlements. The first two students graduated in April this year.
Content photo 2
Thapelo Chacha, master’s student in Urban and Regional Planning at the UFS, MEC Tshidi Koloi, and Sebabatso Mofama, mentor in the
Innovative Housing Building Project: Qala Phelang Tala. (Photo: Leonie Bolleurs) 





News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept