Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
05 May 2020 | Story Rulanzen Martin | Photo Supplied
Margaret Linström has been teaching journalism at the UFS for almost a decade.

The credibility of journalism is facing an unprecedented threat around the world, and even more so during the current Covid-19 pandemic. With the reality of fake news and misinformation via social media platforms it has created a situation which can only be addressed through a free press.  

According to Margaret Linström, freelance journalist and lecturer in journalism in the Department of Communication Science at the University of the Free State (UFS): The role of journalists has become even more important during the Covid-19 pandemic when the lives of people literally depend on accurate and credible information. 
“Having access to accurate information can mean the difference between life and death during this global crisis,” says Linström 

It is therefore fitting that the theme for this year’s World Press Freedom Day (3 May 2020) is Journalism without fear or favour, as many journalists are currently engaging in possible life-threatening missions to honour the commitment of providing verified, scientific, fact-based news and analysis and bringing the news to the people. “World Press Freedom Day was proclaimed by the United Nations in 1993. “The day was inspired by the efforts of African journalists who called for media pluralism and independence,” says Linström  

The day serves as a reminder to governments of the need to respect the commitment they have to press freedom. 


Is Covid-19 redefining journalism? 

The defined role of journalists must never change and should therefore be no different during a global crisis, which is “to inform, investigate, analyse, provide multiple perspectives, and build democracy.” The changes the pandemic could impose on journalism will most likely only become apparent after some time, which is why the International Center for Journalists, a non-profit organisation, has already launched an international study on how Covid-19 is transforming the industry.   

“Probably the most interesting innovation is how journalists are managing to report on the pandemic from their homes. This is of course only possible as a result of technological advances,” says Linström. She also notes that infographics used in the media are increasingly becoming a large part of the news coverage around statistics and “it is important to place these statistics in context for the readers, which is often best done by way of a visual representation like comparing the infection rates of different countries”. 

In South Africa, the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism is an active media player that is keeping an eye open in terms of trustworthy news but also innovation in reporting. It is an independent media organisation which has been doing commendable work since the start of the pandemic.

Misinformation a second pandemic 

With the continued spread of Covid-19 there is a second pandemic which has spread alongside it, that of fake news and misinformation or distorted truth. “These can range from harmful to downright deadly health advice, to outrageous conspiracy theories. The only way to address this second pandemic is for the media to provide accurate, scientific, fact-based news and analysis,” says Linström.

The Covid-19 pandemic reminds us of the importance of a free and independent press that reports verified information to the public, and holds those in power accountable. Linström, who has more than 20 years of journalism experience, says that lies and propaganda are not new concepts – “what is new is the ease with which any Dick, Tom or Harry can create fake news and the speed and ease with which it spreads globally”, she says. 

Having been a journalism academic for the past 10 years Linström stresses that journalists can combat fake news by “using basic skills of fact-checking and verification and providing the public with news that trustworthy, timely and unbiased. To put it succinctly, journalism is the weapon of change as a result of information having been weaponised”. 

News Archive

Gender bias still rife in African Universities
2007-08-03

 

 At the lecture were, from the left: Prof. Magda Fourie (Vice-Rector: Academic Planning), Prof. Amina Mama (Chair: Gender Studies, University of Cape Town), Prof. Engela Pretorius (Vice-Dean: Humanties) and Prof. Letticia Moja (Dean: Faculty of Health Sciences).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Gender bias still rife in African Universities

Women constitute about 30% of student enrolment in African universities, and only about 6% of African professors are women. This is according to the chairperson of Gender Studies at the University of Cape Town, Prof Amina Mama.

Prof Mama was delivering a lecture on the topic “Rethinking African Universities” as part of Women’s Day celebrations at the University of the Free State (UFS) today.

She says the gender profile suggests that the majority of the women who work in African universities are not academics and researchers, but rather the providers of secretarial, cleaning, catering, student welfare and other administrative and support services.

She said that African universities continue to display profound gender bias in their students and staffing profiles and, more significantly, are deeply inequitable in their institutional and intellectual cultures. She said women find it difficult to succeed at universities as they are imbued with patriarchal values and assumptions that affect all aspects of life and learning.

She said that even though African universities have never excluded women, enrolling them presents only the first hurdle in a much longer process.

“The research evidence suggests that once women have found their way into the universities, then gender differentiations continue to arise and to affect the experience and performance of women students in numerous ways. Even within single institutions disparities manifest across the levels of the hierarchy, within and across faculties and disciplines, within and between academic and administrative roles, across generations, and vary with class and social background, marital status, parental status, and probably many more factors besides these”, she said.

She lamented the fact that there is no field of study free of gender inequalities, particularly at postgraduate levels and in the higher ranks of academics. “Although more women study the arts, social sciences and humanities, few make it to professor and their research and creative output remains less”, she said.

Prof Mama said gender gaps as far as employment of women within African universities is concerned are generally wider than in student enrolment. She said although many women are employed in junior administrative and support capacities, there continues to be gross under-representation of women among senior administrative and academic staff. She said this disparity becomes more pronounced as one moves up the ranks.

“South African universities are ahead, but they are not as radically different as their policy rhetoric might suggest. A decade and a half after the end of apartheid only three of the 23 vice-chancellors in the country are women, and women fill fewer than 30% of the senior positions (Deans, Executive Directors and Deputy Vice-Chancellors)”, she said.

She made an observation that highly qualified women accept administrative positions as opposed to academic work, thus ensuring that men continue to dominate the ranks of those defined as ‘great thinkers’ or ‘accomplished researchers’.

“Perhaps women simply make realistic career choices, opting out of academic competition with male colleagues who they can easily perceive to be systematically advantaged, not only within the institution, but also on the personal and domestic fronts, which still see most African women holding the baby, literally and figuratively”, she said

She also touched on sexual harassment and abuse which she said appears to be a commonplace on African campuses. “In contexts where sexual transactions are a pervasive feature of academic life, women who do succeed are unlikely to be perceived as having done so on the basis of merit or hard work, and may be treated with derision and disbelief”, she said.

She, however, said in spite of broader patterns of gender and class inequality in universities, public higher education remains a main route to career advancement and mobility for women in Africa.

“Women’s constrained access has therefore posed a constraint to their pursuit of more equitable and just modes of political, economic and social development, not to mention freedom from direct oppression”, she said.

Prof Mama concluded by saying, “There is a widely held agreement that there is a need to rethink our universities and to ensure that they are transformed into institutions more compatible with the democratic and social justice agendas that are now leading Africa beyond the legacies of dictatorship, conflict and economic crisis, beyond the deep social divisions and inequalities that have characterised our history”.

She said rethinking universities means asking deeper questions about gender relations within them, and taking concerted and effective action to transform these privileged bastions of higher learning so that they can fulfil their pubic mandate and promise instead of lagging behind our steadily improving laws and policies.

Media Release
Issued by: Mangaliso Radebe
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2828
Cell: 078 460 3320
E-mail: radebemt.stg@ufs.ac.za  
02 August 2007
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept