Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
05 May 2020 | Story Rulanzen Martin | Photo Supplied
Margaret Linström has been teaching journalism at the UFS for almost a decade.

The credibility of journalism is facing an unprecedented threat around the world, and even more so during the current Covid-19 pandemic. With the reality of fake news and misinformation via social media platforms it has created a situation which can only be addressed through a free press.  

According to Margaret Linström, freelance journalist and lecturer in journalism in the Department of Communication Science at the University of the Free State (UFS): The role of journalists has become even more important during the Covid-19 pandemic when the lives of people literally depend on accurate and credible information. 
“Having access to accurate information can mean the difference between life and death during this global crisis,” says Linström 

It is therefore fitting that the theme for this year’s World Press Freedom Day (3 May 2020) is Journalism without fear or favour, as many journalists are currently engaging in possible life-threatening missions to honour the commitment of providing verified, scientific, fact-based news and analysis and bringing the news to the people. “World Press Freedom Day was proclaimed by the United Nations in 1993. “The day was inspired by the efforts of African journalists who called for media pluralism and independence,” says Linström  

The day serves as a reminder to governments of the need to respect the commitment they have to press freedom. 


Is Covid-19 redefining journalism? 

The defined role of journalists must never change and should therefore be no different during a global crisis, which is “to inform, investigate, analyse, provide multiple perspectives, and build democracy.” The changes the pandemic could impose on journalism will most likely only become apparent after some time, which is why the International Center for Journalists, a non-profit organisation, has already launched an international study on how Covid-19 is transforming the industry.   

“Probably the most interesting innovation is how journalists are managing to report on the pandemic from their homes. This is of course only possible as a result of technological advances,” says Linström. She also notes that infographics used in the media are increasingly becoming a large part of the news coverage around statistics and “it is important to place these statistics in context for the readers, which is often best done by way of a visual representation like comparing the infection rates of different countries”. 

In South Africa, the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism is an active media player that is keeping an eye open in terms of trustworthy news but also innovation in reporting. It is an independent media organisation which has been doing commendable work since the start of the pandemic.

Misinformation a second pandemic 

With the continued spread of Covid-19 there is a second pandemic which has spread alongside it, that of fake news and misinformation or distorted truth. “These can range from harmful to downright deadly health advice, to outrageous conspiracy theories. The only way to address this second pandemic is for the media to provide accurate, scientific, fact-based news and analysis,” says Linström.

The Covid-19 pandemic reminds us of the importance of a free and independent press that reports verified information to the public, and holds those in power accountable. Linström, who has more than 20 years of journalism experience, says that lies and propaganda are not new concepts – “what is new is the ease with which any Dick, Tom or Harry can create fake news and the speed and ease with which it spreads globally”, she says. 

Having been a journalism academic for the past 10 years Linström stresses that journalists can combat fake news by “using basic skills of fact-checking and verification and providing the public with news that trustworthy, timely and unbiased. To put it succinctly, journalism is the weapon of change as a result of information having been weaponised”. 

News Archive

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy
2007-08-06

 

In her inaugural lecture Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Sciences, focused on the impact that Pan-Africanist sentiments have had on South Africa’s foreign policy. She also put the resulting contradictions and ambiguities into context. At her inaugural lecture were, from the left: Proff. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS), Heidi Hudson, Engela Pretorius (Vice-Dean: Faculty of The Humanities) and Daan Wessels (Research Associate in the Department of Political Science).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy

“We are committed to full participation as an equal partner … opposed to any efforts which might seek to project South Africa as some kind of superpower on our continent. … the people of Africa share a common destiny and must therefore … address their challenges … as a united force...” (Mbeki 1998:198-199).

Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Science referred to this statement made by president Mbeki (made at the opening of the OAU Conference of Ministers of Information in 1995) when she delivered her inaugural lecture on the topic: South African foreign policy: The politics of Pan-Africanism and pragmatism.

One of the questions she asked is: “Can the South African state deliver democracy and welfare at home while simultaneously creating a stable, rules-based African community?”

She answers: “South Africa needs to reflect more critically and honestly on the dualism inherent in its ideological assumptions regarding relations with Africa. South Africa will always be expected by some to play a leadership role in Africa. At the moment, South Africa’s desire to be liked is hampering its role as leader of the continent.”

In her lecture she highlighted the ideological underpinnings and manifestations of South Africa’s foreign policy. Throughout she alluded to the risks associated with single-mindedly following an ideologically driven foreign policy. She emphasised that domestic or national interests are the victims in this process.

Prof. Hudson offers three broad options for South Africa to consider:

  • The Predator – the selfish bully promoting South African economic interest.
  • Mr Nice Guy – the non-hegemonic partner of the African boys club, multilaterally pursuing a pivotal but not dominant role.
  • The Hegemon - South Africa driving regional integration according to its values and favouring some African countries over others, and with checks and balances by civil society.

She chooses option three of hegemony. “Politically correct research views hegemony as bad and partnership as good. This is a romanticised notion – the two are not mutually exclusive,” she said.

However, she states that there have to be prerequisites to control the exercise of power. “The promotion of a counter-hegemon, such as Nigeria, is necessary. Nigeria has been more effective in some respects than South Africa in establishing its leadership, particularly in West Africa. Also needed is that government should be checked by civil society to avoid it sinking into authoritarianism. The case of business and labour coming to an agreement over the HIV/Aids issue is a positive example which illustrates that government cannot ignore civil society. But much more needs to be done in this regard. South Africa must also be very careful in how it uses its aid and should focus potential aid and development projects more explicitly in terms of promoting political stability,” she said.

Prof. Hudson said: “It is also questionable whether Mbeki’s Afro-centrism has in fact promoted the interests of ordinary citizens across Africa. Instead, elite interests in some countries have benefited. But ultimately, the single most important cost is the damage done to the moral code and ethical principles on which the South African Constitution and democracy is founded.

“In the end we all lose out. More pragmatism and less ideology in our relations within Africa may just be what are needed,” she said.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept