Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
04 August 2021 | Story Giselle Baillie

A project working towards the achievement of the Integrated Transformation Plan of the University of the Free State.


The names of buildings are not neutral ideas – even more so when they reflect, for example, the names or namesakes of people, places, or concepts on campus. Rather, they play a significant role in expressing and shaping what the institution values, who the space is for, and how communities engaging with the space are encouraged to think, feel, and behave. 

The Bloemfontein Campus of the University of the Free State (UFS) is undertaking two name review projects as part of its transformation processes. The first focuses on the review of the names and symbols of buildings utilised as student residences. Framed by the Integrated Transformation Plan (ITP) of the UFS and mandated by the Naming Committee of the UFS, the process entails that all residences evaluate whether their current building/house names reflect and align with the values of the constitution and the values of the UFS, and whether these names create a sense of inclusion and belonging for all within the UFS community. 

Furthermore, whether the symbols (songs, practices, and so forth) utilised within the junior residences are up to date regarding these objectives, and whether they demonstrate and create experiences for their communities that are aligned with these values. 

The second project focuses on the review of the name of a building currently occupied by the Faculty of Health Sciences, and which was utilised as a student hostel in previous years. 

Since early 2021, various partners from the UFS have been engaged in consultations and planning with their stakeholders and communities for these projects, which will unfold in the second semester. 

The objectives of these projects are to engage through education and dialogue processes in critical reflections on the role that the names and symbols associated with buildings on a university campus play in shaping and expressing institutional values and culture, and the associated sense of belonging that it creates for its diverse communities. Furthermore, to provide the opportunity for the UFS community to craft a new institutional culture through new names and renewed cultural practices, where necessary, based on constitutional as well as UFS values.

The UFS community is invited to participate in the projects as follows:

The Bloemfontein Campus Residence Name and Symbol Review Process

9-24 August: A Blackboard platform hosting educational materials on the project will be launched, with the UFS community encouraged to engage with this. 

9-16 August: Junior and day residences will host various dialogues within their houses, focusing on exploring their names and symbols. Senior residences with associated names or conceptual frames, as well as alumni, are encouraged to join these dialogues. Recordings of the dialogues will also be made available on the project’s Blackboard platform. 

16-19 August: A range of institutional dialogues will take place, focused on key reflections regarding the current names of residences. These dialogues will take place daily from 16:00 to 19:00 and will be convened and moderated by SRC representatives. 

Click below to access the different dialogue invitations and to find the virtual links to these dialogues.

16 August 2021

17 August 2021

18 August 2021

19 August 2021

20-24 August: The Bloemfontein Campus community, inclusive of students, staff, and alumni, are invited to participate by expressing their thinking regarding the current building names through an online review platform. Where participants feel that the current name/s are not aligned with constitutional and UFS values and the desired institutional culture of the UFS, they will be encouraged to promote a new name/s as per the guidelines that will be provided for naming. Residence students will also be afforded the opportunity to critically reflect on and review their residence symbols.


23 September: Findings from the review process will be communicated to the UFS community.  

December 2021: The decisions of Council on the review and possible new names will be communicated to the UFS community. 

The CR de Wet Building Name Review Project

2-17 August: A Blackboard platform hosting educational materials on the project be found at this link, with the UFS community encouraged to engage with this.

3-12 August: Students and staff of the Faculty of Health Sciences will engage in dialogues focused on reviewing the name of one of its buildings, the CR de Wet Building, which houses the staff offices, as well as lecture and practical venues of the School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and the departments of Family Medicine, Occupational Therapy, Optometry, Biostatistics, Physiotherapy, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

10-11 August: The broader UFS community is invited to also engage in a dialogue focused on reviewing the name of the afore-mentioned building.

11 August: Alumni of the former CR de Wet hostel will engage in a dialogue focused on reviewing the name of the afore-mentioned building.

12-17 August: The Bloemfontein Campus community, inclusive of students, staff, and alumni, are invited to participate by expressing their thinking regarding the current building name through an online review platform. Where participants feel that the current name needs to be changed, they will be encouraged to promote a new name as per the guidelines that will be provided for naming.

23 September: Findings from the review process will be communicated to the UFS community.  

December 2021: The decision of Council on the review and possible new name – where the review necessitated change – will be communicated to the UFS community.  

 

News Archive

Game farming a lens to analyse challenges facing democratic SA – Dr Kamuti
2017-05-30

 Description: Dr Kamuti Tags: Dr Kamuti

Dr Tariro Kamuti, Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre
for Africa Studies at the University of the Free State.
Photo: Rulanzen Martin

One of the challenges facing South Africa’s developing game farming policy is the fractured state in the governance of the private game farming sector, says Dr Tariro Kamuti.

Dr Kamuti, a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Centre for Africa Studies (CAS) at the University of the Free State (UFS), was presenting a seminar on Wednesday 17 May 2017 under the topic, Private Wildlife Governance in a Context of Radical Uncertainty: Challenges of South Africa’s Developing Game Farming Policy, which takes material from his PhD. He received his PhD from both the Vrije University in Amsterdam and the UFS in 2016.

His presentation explored how the private game industry positions itself in accordance with existing agricultural and environmental regulations. It also investigated the state’s response to the challenge of competing needs over land and wildlife resources which is posed by the gaming sector. “The transformation of the institutional processes mediating governance of the private game farming sector has been a long and enduring arrangement emerging organically over time,” Dr Kamuti said.

Game farming links wildlife and agricultural sectors
“I decided on this topic to highlight that game farming links the wildlife sector (associated with conservation and tourism) and the agricultural sector. Both make use of land whose resources need to be sustainably utilised to meet a broad spectrum of needs for the diverse South African population.

“The continuous skewed ownership of land post-1994 justifies questioning of the role of the state in confronting challenges of social justice and transformation within the economy.”

“Game farming can thus be viewed as a lens through which to study the broad challenges facing a democratic South Africa, and to interrogate the regulatory and policy framework in the agricultural and wildlife sectors at their interface,” Dr Kamuti said.

Challenges facing game farming policies

The state alone does not apply itself to the regulation of private gaming as a sector. “There is no clear direction on the position of private game farming at the interface of environmental and agricultural regulations, hence game farmers take advantage of loopholes in these institutional arrangements to forge ahead,” Dr Kamuti said.

He further went on to say that the state lacked a coherent plan for the South African countryside, “as shown by the outstanding land restitution and labour tenant claims on privately owned land earmarked for wildlife production”.

The South African government was confronted with a context in which the status quo of the prosperity of the middle classes under neoliberal policies was pitted against the urgent need to improve the material well-being of the majority poor.  Unless such issues were addressed, this necessarily undermined democracy as a participatory social force, Dr Kamuti said.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept