Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Why midwifery should be in the hands of trained midwives

20 December 2021 | Story Elsabé Brits

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country.

Midwives who are properly trained and acknowledged for their skill and experience do not only save lives but make a huge contribution to maternal health in South Africa. However, there is a dire need for professional midwives and competent educators.

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with the title: Competencies of South African midwifery educators: a transformative framework. It is a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country. Sadly, just months after she received her degree she passed away. Yet, her colleagues at the School of Nursing at the UFS continue to build on the foundation she laid.

Too much too soon, too little too late

The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that 10-15% of births may need intervention through caesarean section. A recent analysis, however, found that private hospitals had a caesarean section rate of 73.6%, compared to 26% in the public sector.

Although the public sector rate is higher than the WHO target, the private sector rate is not justifiable, Bekker writes. The case fatality rate for mothers who died after a caesarean section had been performed showed an increase. That is one of the statements indicating that not all medical interventions are of benefit to mothers.

A focus on too much too soon or too little too late in the Lancet series on midwifery of 2014 indicated the need for better-quality care. In South Africa both manifest because of the disparity between private and public healthcare. According to Bekker’s research, the high caesarean section rate in the private sector is a classic example of over-medicalisation of obstetric care, whereas the public healthcare system follows a midwifery-led model of care.

“Midwives are a vital solution to correct this disparity. Competent midwives, educated to standards, can prevent interventions without indication, provide service in rural settings and advocate for the rights of the childbearing family,” she wrote.

Midwifery is a disempowered profession

Winnie Moroa Motlolometsi, a midwifery educator, explains that professional nurses in the country have a dual registration with the South African Nursing Council as a nurse-midwife. This leads to many qualified midwives not necessarily practising as midwives. It is therefore very difficult to calculate the number of practising midwives.

Furthermore, the conflation of nursing and midwifery requires training as a generalist practitioner. Depending on the institution where they are trained, professional nurses may or may not comply with the International Confederation of Midwives’ Global Standards for education and regulation of the midwifery profession.

Nevertheless, according to Dr Bekker’s research, midwifery is a disempowered profession, because the global guiding documents are neither considered by the regulatory authority nor the National Department of Health. There is a triple gap for competencies, coverage, and access:

Insufficient numbers of competent midwives
.. who can cover maternal health services

…who render services that address the needs of women

There is a dire need for competent midwives in the country, but the predicament is that whilst midwifery educators are qualified, they are not necessarily clinical specialists, which ultimately jeopardises the quality of maternal healthcare.

What was also clear from Bekker’s research is that although South Africa has a progressive constitution, gender equality has not materialised on grassroots level. Violence is ever present. Women are viewed as weaker, vulnerable, and less suited for the workplace. Nonconformity to sexual gender norms, based on cultural or religious bias, creates conflict for some women.

Dr Deidre van Jaarsveldt, senior lecturer in the School of Nursing at the UFS, said Bekker’s study highlighted that feminism is a strengthening agency for women. In this study it was important to frame the context of midwifery as a disempowered, woman-led profession, caring for women who are still finding themselves in a society where there is gender inequality.

The research indicated that there were many challenges:

Lack of autonomy for midwives
Non-compliance with the global midwifery standards
Conflation of nursing and midwifery
Midwifery regulated by non-midwives
Lack of direct entry into midwifery education in the country

High litigation in maternal and child healthcare – there is fearfulness among practitioners and reluctance to work within the midwifery profession

In practice it is difficult to distinguish midwifery specialists from nurses who are practising as generalists and are expected to offer maternal healthcare services. If something goes wrong, the midwifery profession is held accountable, but practising midwives were not necessarily involved.

Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub

There is a dire need for midwifery to become an autonomous profession guided by global standards. Membership should be based on advanced qualifications, which strengthen midwifery as a speciality. This can only be attained through education and maintained by a regulatory body, as well as the de-conflation of midwifery from nursing. When this happens, midwives will know who the actual midwives are and be able to hold one another accountable, Motlolometsi adds.

Dr Bekker advocated for the “decolonising” of midwifery, which means restoring the knowledge to the profession. To allow midwives to receive quality education, midwifery should become an independent profession that is guided by global standards and regulated by midwives.

Van Jaarsveldt says the School of Nursing at the UFS endeavours to offer quality midwifery education. Students learn in a high-tech simulated learning environment where they can become competent before working with actual mothers and babies. The educators are clinical experts, supported by a team of midwifery practitioners who act as preceptors for the students.

Before her untimely death, Dr Bekker started establishing a Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub in the Faculty of Health Sciences, which is continuing under the leadership of Dr Cynthia Spies, supported by a team of interprofessional experts.

“Through research and continuous improvement of education and practice, this group of professionals envisions optimising and strengthening reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health competencies so that current maternal and child morbidity and mortality trends can improve resulting in surviving and thriving childrearing families.

“The goal is to develop partnerships and opportunities for collaboration and research with colleagues in healthcare disciplines and to extend beyond healthcare to include innovative interdisciplinary partnerships,” says Spies. The objectives include:

Practice development with implementation of evidence-based practice and positive experience of the childbirth and child health continuum;
Clinical competency development through training and the development of short learning programmes;
Clinical research that addresses the current reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health mortality, morbidity and health issues in central South Africa.

News Archive

Bloemfontein's quality of tap water compares very favourably with bottled water

2009-08-04

The quality of the drinking water of five suburbs in Bloemfontein is at least as good as or better than bottled water. This is the result of a standard and chemical bacterial analysis done by the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Centre for Environmental Management in collaboration with the Institute for Groundwater Studies (IGS).

Five samples were taken from tap water sources in the suburbs of Universitas, Brandwag, Bain’s Vlei, Langenhoven Park and Bayswater and 15 samples were taken of different brands of still and unflavoured bottled water. The samples were analysed at the laboratory of the IGS, while the interpretation of the analysis was done by the Centre for Environmental Management.

“We wanted to evaluate the difference in quality for human consumption between tap water and that of the different brands of bottled water,” said Prof. Maitland Seaman, Head of the Centre for Environmental Management.

“With the exception of two samples produced by multinational companies at their plants in South Africa, the different brands of bottled water used for the study were produced by South African companies, including a local small-scale Bloemfontein producer,” said Prof. Seaman.

According to the labels, the sources of the water vary from pure spring water, to partial reverse osmosis (as an aid to standardise salt, i.e. mineral, content), to only reverse osmosis (to remove salts). (Reverse osmosis is a process in which water is forced under pressure through a pipe with minute pores through which water passes but no – or very low concentrations of – salts pass.)

According to Prof. Seaman, the analysis revealed some interesting findings, such as:

• It is generally accepted that drinking water should have an acceptable level of salt content, as the body needs salts. Most mineral contents were relatively higher in the tap water samples than the bottled water samples and were very much within the acceptable range of drinkable water quality. One of the bottled samples, however, had a very low mineral content, as the water was produced by reverse osmosis, as stated on the bottle. While reverse osmosis is used by various producers, most producers use it as an aid, not as a single method to remove nearly all the salts. Drinking only such water over a prolonged period may probably have a negative effect on the human physiology.

• The pH values of the tap water samples (8,12–8,40) were found to be slightly higher (slightly alkaline), like in all south-eastern Free State rivers (from where the water is sourced) than the pH of most of the bottled water samples, most of which are sourced and/or treated in other areas. Two brands of bottled water were found to have relatively low pH levels (both 4,5, i.e. acidic) as indicated on their bottles and as confirmed by the IGS analysis. The health implication of this range of pH is not significant.

• The analysis showed differences in the mineral content given on the labels of most of the water bottles compared to that found by IGS analysis. The possibility of seasonal fluctuation in content, depending on various factors, is expected and most of the bottling companies also indicate this on their labels. What was a rather interesting finding was that two pairs of bottled water brands claimed exactly the same mineral content but appeared under different brand names and were also priced differently. In each case, one of the pair was a well-known house brand, and the other obviously the original producer. In one of these paired cases, the house brand stated that the water was spring water, while the other (identical) “original” brand stated that it was spring water treated by reverse osmosis and oxygen-enriched.

• Nitrate (NO3) levels were uniformly low except in one bottled sample, suggesting a low (non-threatening) level of organic pollution in the source water. Otherwise, none of the water showed any sign of pollution.

• The bacterial analysis confirmed the absence of any traces of coliforms or E.coli in any of the samples, as was also indicated by the bottling companies. This is very reassuring. What is not known is how all these waters were sterilised, which could be anything from irradiation to chlorine or ozone treatment.

• The price of the different brands of bottled water, each containing 500 ml of still water, ranged between R3,99 and R8,99, with R5,03 being the average price. A comparison between the least expensive and the most expensive bottles of water indicated no significant difference in quality. In fact, discrepancies were observed in the most expensive bottle in that the amount of Calcium (Ca) claimed to be present in it was found to be significantly different from what the analysis indicated (29,6 mg/l versus 0,92 mg/l). The alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) indicated on the bottle was also found to differ considerably (83 mg/l versus 9,4 mg/l). The concentration of Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) was not given on the product.

“The preference for bottled water as compared to Bloemfontein’s tap water from a qualitative perspective as well as the price discrepancy is unjustifiable. The environmental footprint of bottled water is also large. Sourcing, treating, bottling, packaging and transporting, to mention but a few of the steps involved in the processing of bottled water, entail a huge carbon footprint, as well as a large water footprint, because it also requires water for treating and rinsing to process bottled water,” said Prof. Seaman.

Media Release
Lacea Loader
Deputy Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za
3 August 2009

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept