Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Why midwifery should be in the hands of trained midwives

20 December 2021 | Story Elsabé Brits

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country.

Midwives who are properly trained and acknowledged for their skill and experience do not only save lives but make a huge contribution to maternal health in South Africa. However, there is a dire need for professional midwives and competent educators.

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with the title: Competencies of South African midwifery educators: a transformative framework. It is a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country. Sadly, just months after she received her degree she passed away. Yet, her colleagues at the School of Nursing at the UFS continue to build on the foundation she laid.

Too much too soon, too little too late

The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that 10-15% of births may need intervention through caesarean section. A recent analysis, however, found that private hospitals had a caesarean section rate of 73.6%, compared to 26% in the public sector.

Although the public sector rate is higher than the WHO target, the private sector rate is not justifiable, Bekker writes. The case fatality rate for mothers who died after a caesarean section had been performed showed an increase. That is one of the statements indicating that not all medical interventions are of benefit to mothers.

A focus on too much too soon or too little too late in the Lancet series on midwifery of 2014 indicated the need for better-quality care. In South Africa both manifest because of the disparity between private and public healthcare. According to Bekker’s research, the high caesarean section rate in the private sector is a classic example of over-medicalisation of obstetric care, whereas the public healthcare system follows a midwifery-led model of care.

“Midwives are a vital solution to correct this disparity. Competent midwives, educated to standards, can prevent interventions without indication, provide service in rural settings and advocate for the rights of the childbearing family,” she wrote.

Midwifery is a disempowered profession

Winnie Moroa Motlolometsi, a midwifery educator, explains that professional nurses in the country have a dual registration with the South African Nursing Council as a nurse-midwife. This leads to many qualified midwives not necessarily practising as midwives. It is therefore very difficult to calculate the number of practising midwives.

Furthermore, the conflation of nursing and midwifery requires training as a generalist practitioner. Depending on the institution where they are trained, professional nurses may or may not comply with the International Confederation of Midwives’ Global Standards for education and regulation of the midwifery profession.

Nevertheless, according to Dr Bekker’s research, midwifery is a disempowered profession, because the global guiding documents are neither considered by the regulatory authority nor the National Department of Health. There is a triple gap for competencies, coverage, and access:

Insufficient numbers of competent midwives
.. who can cover maternal health services

…who render services that address the needs of women

There is a dire need for competent midwives in the country, but the predicament is that whilst midwifery educators are qualified, they are not necessarily clinical specialists, which ultimately jeopardises the quality of maternal healthcare.

What was also clear from Bekker’s research is that although South Africa has a progressive constitution, gender equality has not materialised on grassroots level. Violence is ever present. Women are viewed as weaker, vulnerable, and less suited for the workplace. Nonconformity to sexual gender norms, based on cultural or religious bias, creates conflict for some women.

Dr Deidre van Jaarsveldt, senior lecturer in the School of Nursing at the UFS, said Bekker’s study highlighted that feminism is a strengthening agency for women. In this study it was important to frame the context of midwifery as a disempowered, woman-led profession, caring for women who are still finding themselves in a society where there is gender inequality.

The research indicated that there were many challenges:

Lack of autonomy for midwives
Non-compliance with the global midwifery standards
Conflation of nursing and midwifery
Midwifery regulated by non-midwives
Lack of direct entry into midwifery education in the country

High litigation in maternal and child healthcare – there is fearfulness among practitioners and reluctance to work within the midwifery profession

In practice it is difficult to distinguish midwifery specialists from nurses who are practising as generalists and are expected to offer maternal healthcare services. If something goes wrong, the midwifery profession is held accountable, but practising midwives were not necessarily involved.

Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub

There is a dire need for midwifery to become an autonomous profession guided by global standards. Membership should be based on advanced qualifications, which strengthen midwifery as a speciality. This can only be attained through education and maintained by a regulatory body, as well as the de-conflation of midwifery from nursing. When this happens, midwives will know who the actual midwives are and be able to hold one another accountable, Motlolometsi adds.

Dr Bekker advocated for the “decolonising” of midwifery, which means restoring the knowledge to the profession. To allow midwives to receive quality education, midwifery should become an independent profession that is guided by global standards and regulated by midwives.

Van Jaarsveldt says the School of Nursing at the UFS endeavours to offer quality midwifery education. Students learn in a high-tech simulated learning environment where they can become competent before working with actual mothers and babies. The educators are clinical experts, supported by a team of midwifery practitioners who act as preceptors for the students.

Before her untimely death, Dr Bekker started establishing a Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub in the Faculty of Health Sciences, which is continuing under the leadership of Dr Cynthia Spies, supported by a team of interprofessional experts.

“Through research and continuous improvement of education and practice, this group of professionals envisions optimising and strengthening reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health competencies so that current maternal and child morbidity and mortality trends can improve resulting in surviving and thriving childrearing families.

“The goal is to develop partnerships and opportunities for collaboration and research with colleagues in healthcare disciplines and to extend beyond healthcare to include innovative interdisciplinary partnerships,” says Spies. The objectives include:

Practice development with implementation of evidence-based practice and positive experience of the childbirth and child health continuum;
Clinical competency development through training and the development of short learning programmes;
Clinical research that addresses the current reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health mortality, morbidity and health issues in central South Africa.

News Archive

Open letter from Prof Jonathan Jansen to all UFS students

2014-02-22

Dear Students of the University of the Free State

In the past four years there has emerged a new consensus on the three campuses of the University of the Free State (UFS) about the things that divide us – such as racism, sexism and homophobia. Students and campus leaders have worked hard to develop this new consensus in residences and in the open spaces on campus. There can be no doubt that new bonds of friendship have developed across the markers of race, ethnicity, class, religion and sexual orientation. I bear witness to these new solidarities every day on the campus.

You chose a white student to head up the transformation portfolio on the SRC. You chose a black captain to head up the university’s first team in rugby. You chose a white “prime” as head of residence to lead a predominantly black men’s residence. You chose a South African woman of Indian descent as Rag Queen and last week, a black student from Cape Town as the men’s Rag winner—choices not possible and never made before in our campus history. Many of you have intimate friends who come from different social or cultural or religious backgrounds. You learn together, share rooms together, pray together and party together. In other words, in the day to day workings of this university campus, you have demonstrated to campus, city and country that we can overcome the lingering effects of racism and other maladies in this new generation. You have helped create a university community inclusive of people of diverse religions, abilities, class and sexual orientation.

I have said this repeatedly that from time to time this new consensus will be tested – when a minority of students, and they are a small and dwindling minority, still act as if these are the days of apartheid. And when that consensus is tested as it was this week, and as it will be tested in the future, only then we will be able to assess the strength and durability of our progress in creating a new South African campus culture of human togetherness based on respect, dignity and embrace.

The real test of our leadership, including student leadership, is how we respond when our transformation drive is threatened.

Let me say this: I have absolute faith in you, as students of this great university, to stand together in your condemnation of these vile acts of violence and to move together in your determination to maintain the momentum for the Human Project of the University of the Free State. We have come too far to allow a few criminals to derail what you have built together in recent years.

There will, no doubt, be unscrupulous people on all sides of the political spectrum wanting to milk this tragedy for their own narrow purposes. There will be false information, rumours and exaggerations by those who wish to inflame a bad situation to gain mileage for their agendas. That is inevitable in a country that is still so divided.

I ask you, through all of this, to keep perspective. Two or ten or even twenty students behaving badly do not represent 30,000 students; a minority of violent and hateful persons do not represent the ideals, ambitions and commitments of the majority. At the same time, let us be realistic – anyone who thinks you can drive transformation without resistance clearly does not understand the difficult process of change.

The events of the week remind us, however, that we still have a long road to walk in deepening social and academic transformation at our university. Yes, we have invested hundreds of hours in training and mentorship; we have created new structures – such as the Institute for Reconciliation and Social Justice – to capture the energy and imagination of students driving transformation; we have created many opportunities for students to study and travel on this and other continents to enable cross-cultural learning; we have established formal and informal opportunities to dialogue about difficult issues on and off campus between students and their leaders; and we crafted new curricula to enable teaching and learning on the big questions of our times.

But this is clearly not enough, and so I have decided on the following immediate next steps:

We will meet for several hours next week to think about how we can deepen the transformation of our university after this terrible incident.
We will arrange a University Assembly on the events of the past week so that we speak with one voice on human wrongs and to re-commit to human rights and we will continue with open forum discussions during the months to come.
We will review the entire spectrum of programmes, from orientation to residence life to the undergraduate curriculum, to determine how effective our interventions really are in reaching all students with respect to basic issues of human rights.
We will review our media and communications strategy to determine how far and deep our messages on human rights travel across all sectors of the university community. In this regard it is important that the campus be blanketed on a regular basis with our condemnation of human wrongs and our commitment to human rights.
We will commission the Institute for Reconciliation and Social Justice to review the events of the past week and make recommendations on how we can improve the campus environment so that all students are protected from harm inside residences, classrooms and in open spaces of the campus.
We will take the questions raised during this week into the academic community and to the general staff of the university so that all personnel also engage with our own roles and responsibilities with respect to campus transformations.
We undertake to make annual report-backs on transformation to all stakeholders in public forums so that students and staff and external communities can track the progress of the university on matters of human rights on campus.

I wish to thank my staff for acting firmly as soon as this tragic event came to our attention. We worked through the night to find and identify the perpetrators. We traced the two students and immediately handed them to the police. They were expelled. And throughout this process we offered counselling and support to the victim of this violent act.

The two former students were expelled and will now face justice in the criminal courts. It is hoped that in the course of time they will come to their senses and seek restoration and reconciliation with the student they so callously harmed. They are not part of the university community anymore.

That is the kind of university we are.

Jonathan D Jansen
Vice-Chancellor and Rector
University of the Free State
20 February 2014

Note: The use of the word ‘campus’ refers to all three campuses of the UFS, namely the Bloemfontein Campus, South Campus and Qwaqwa Campus.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept