Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
20 December 2021 | Story Elsabé Brits
Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country.

Midwives who are properly trained and acknowledged for their skill and experience do not only save lives but make a huge contribution to maternal health in South Africa. However, there is a dire need for professional midwives and competent educators. 

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with the title: Competencies of South African midwifery educators: a transformative framework. It is a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country. Sadly, just months after she received her degree she passed away. Yet, her colleagues at the School of Nursing at the UFS continue to build on the foundation she laid.  

Too much too soon, too little too late 

The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that 10-15% of births may need intervention through caesarean section. A recent analysis, however, found that private hospitals had a caesarean section rate of 73.6%, compared to 26% in the public sector.

Although the public sector rate is higher than the WHO target, the private sector rate is not justifiable, Bekker writes. The case fatality rate for mothers who died after a caesarean section had been performed showed an increase. That is one of the statements indicating that not all medical interventions are of benefit to mothers.

A focus on too much too soon or too little too late in the Lancet series on midwifery of 2014 indicated the need for better-quality care. In South Africa both manifest because of the disparity between private and public healthcare. According to Bekker’s research, the high caesarean section rate in the private sector is a classic example of over-medicalisation of obstetric care, whereas the public healthcare system follows a midwifery-led model of care.

“Midwives are a vital solution to correct this disparity. Competent midwives, educated to standards, can prevent interventions without indication, provide service in rural settings and advocate for the rights of the childbearing family,” she wrote.

Midwifery is a disempowered profession 

Winnie Moroa Motlolometsi, a midwifery educator, explains that professional nurses in the country have a dual registration with the South African Nursing Council as a nurse-midwife. This leads to many qualified midwives not necessarily practising as midwives. It is therefore very difficult to calculate the number of practising midwives. 

Furthermore, the conflation of nursing and midwifery requires training as a generalist practitioner. Depending on the institution where they are trained, professional nurses may or may not comply with the International Confederation of Midwives’ Global Standards for education and regulation of the midwifery profession. 

Nevertheless, according to Dr Bekker’s research, midwifery is a disempowered profession, because the global guiding documents are neither considered by the regulatory authority nor the National Department of Health. There is a triple gap for competencies, coverage, and access: 

  • Insufficient numbers of competent midwives 

  • .. who can cover maternal health services 

  •  …who render services that address the needs of women 

There is a dire need for competent midwives in the country, but the predicament is that whilst midwifery educators are qualified, they are not necessarily clinical specialists, which ultimately jeopardises the quality of maternal healthcare. 

What was also clear from Bekker’s research is that although South Africa has a progressive constitution, gender equality has not materialised on grassroots level. Violence is ever present. Women are viewed as weaker, vulnerable, and less suited for the workplace. Nonconformity to sexual gender norms, based on cultural or religious bias, creates conflict for some women.  

Dr Deidre van Jaarsveldt, senior lecturer in the School of Nursing at the UFS, said Bekker’s study highlighted that feminism is a strengthening agency for women. In this study it was important to frame the context of midwifery as a disempowered, woman-led profession, caring for women who are still finding themselves in a society where there is gender inequality. 

The research indicated that there were many challenges: 

  • Lack of autonomy for midwives 

  • Non-compliance with the global midwifery standards 

  • Conflation of nursing and midwifery 

  • Midwifery regulated by non-midwives 

  • Lack of direct entry into midwifery education in the country 

  • High litigation in maternal and child healthcare – there is fearfulness among practitioners and reluctance to work within the midwifery profession 

In practice it is difficult to distinguish midwifery specialists from nurses who are practising as generalists and are expected to offer maternal healthcare services. If something goes wrong, the midwifery profession is held accountable, but practising midwives were not necessarily involved. 

Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub 

There is a dire need for midwifery to become an autonomous profession guided by global standards. Membership should be based on advanced qualifications, which strengthen midwifery as a speciality. This can only be attained through education and maintained by a regulatory body, as well as the de-conflation of midwifery from nursing. When this happens, midwives will know who the actual midwives are and be able to hold one another accountable, Motlolometsi adds. 

Dr Bekker advocated for the “decolonising” of midwifery, which means restoring the knowledge to the profession. To allow midwives to receive quality education, midwifery should become an independent profession that is guided by global standards and regulated by midwives.  

Van Jaarsveldt says the School of Nursing at the UFS endeavours to offer quality midwifery education. Students learn in a high-tech simulated learning environment where they can become competent before working with actual mothers and babies. The educators are clinical experts, supported by a team of midwifery practitioners who act as preceptors for the students. 

Before her untimely death, Dr Bekker started establishing a Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub in the Faculty of Health Sciences, which is continuing under the leadership of Dr Cynthia Spies, supported by a team of interprofessional experts.  

“Through research and continuous improvement of education and practice, this group of professionals envisions optimising and strengthening reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health competencies so that current maternal and child morbidity and mortality trends can improve resulting in surviving and thriving childrearing families.  

“The goal is to develop partnerships and opportunities for collaboration and research with colleagues in healthcare disciplines and to extend beyond healthcare to include innovative interdisciplinary partnerships,” says Spies. The objectives include:

  • Practice development with implementation of evidence-based practice and positive experience of the childbirth and child health continuum; 
  • Clinical competency development through training and the development of short learning programmes; 
  • Clinical research that addresses the current reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health mortality, morbidity and health issues in central South Africa.

News Archive

Letter to students from Prof Jonathan Jansen about student protest action at the UFS
2015-10-21

Dear Students

Student protest action at the University of the Free State

I wish to make clear that the senior leadership of the University of the Free State understands and supports the demands from students and their leaders that higher education be accessible to all students, especially the poor. For the past six years we have done everything in our power to meet that commitment to students who are academically talented, but simply cannot afford to pay; that is why our tuition fees remain among the lowest in the country. Our efforts to raise private funding have enabled thousands more students to study at the UFS than would have been possible on the government subsidy only. Whether it is the Staff Fund contributions (yes, our staff empty their pockets to support student fees) or the No Student Hungry (NSH) bursary programme (yes, we raise funds for food bursaries), we will continue our drive to fund students who cannot afford higher education. Let me repeat, no student with a solid academic record will be denied access to studies simply because they cannot pay.

Now, to the matter at hand. There is a national demand from students for a 0% fee increment for 2016. The Minister’s response, after consultation with stakeholders, was that universities should cap their 2016 fee increases at 6%. Despite this initiative from government, the protests continue on virtually all campuses across South Africa for the ‘no fee’ increase.

Our response, as the UFS leadership, is to continue engaging the SRC as the chosen leadership of our students in trying to negotiate a settlement on the matter. We have worked around the clock to be available to student leaders to find some resolution on 2016 fees. While we understand the demands of students, as university leaders, we can only work with the government subsidy we receive. Any agreement reached, cannot and must not place the university at academic and financial risk in its ability to deliver public higher education to the country - if that happens, everybody loses. Still, no matter what happens in terms of the response from government, the leadership door at the UFS remains open to finding a mutually acceptable solution to all parties in these deliberations.

Students, we are deeply concerned by the violence, intimidation and threats from the small group of protesting students. These dangerous and demeaning behaviours, like disrupting classes and verbally abusing students and staff, undermine the legitimate quest of students for relief concerning tuition fees. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable and the university will take action where required. We must also remember that we have an obligation to all 30 000 students whose right to learn without fear of violence and intimidation must be respected.

In conclusion, over the past few years we have worked hard to build a culture of mutual respect and embrace as we worked through some very difficult challenges on campus. You would have noticed that the university leadership responded quickly and sympathetically to reason and respect in difficult situations of rage and demonstration. A minority of students, with some outsiders, have come onto the campus to break down that culture in which, while we might disagree, we continue to work on the basis of mutual respect. I urge all students that, as we engage of this important problem of enabling greater access to higher education, we continue to remain true to the core values of our Human Project.

Best Regards

Prof Jonathan Jansen
Vice-Chancellor and Rector
University of the Free State


Letter to students from Prof Jonathan Jansen about student protest actions at the UFS (Pdf format)

 

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept