Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
20 December 2021 | Story Elsabé Brits
Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country.

Midwives who are properly trained and acknowledged for their skill and experience do not only save lives but make a huge contribution to maternal health in South Africa. However, there is a dire need for professional midwives and competent educators. 

Dr Elgonda Bekker, from the University of the Free State (UFS), completed her doctoral degree in nursing in 2020, with the title: Competencies of South African midwifery educators: a transformative framework. It is a practical, transformative thesis to improve the education of midwives in the country. Sadly, just months after she received her degree she passed away. Yet, her colleagues at the School of Nursing at the UFS continue to build on the foundation she laid.  

Too much too soon, too little too late 

The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that 10-15% of births may need intervention through caesarean section. A recent analysis, however, found that private hospitals had a caesarean section rate of 73.6%, compared to 26% in the public sector.

Although the public sector rate is higher than the WHO target, the private sector rate is not justifiable, Bekker writes. The case fatality rate for mothers who died after a caesarean section had been performed showed an increase. That is one of the statements indicating that not all medical interventions are of benefit to mothers.

A focus on too much too soon or too little too late in the Lancet series on midwifery of 2014 indicated the need for better-quality care. In South Africa both manifest because of the disparity between private and public healthcare. According to Bekker’s research, the high caesarean section rate in the private sector is a classic example of over-medicalisation of obstetric care, whereas the public healthcare system follows a midwifery-led model of care.

“Midwives are a vital solution to correct this disparity. Competent midwives, educated to standards, can prevent interventions without indication, provide service in rural settings and advocate for the rights of the childbearing family,” she wrote.

Midwifery is a disempowered profession 

Winnie Moroa Motlolometsi, a midwifery educator, explains that professional nurses in the country have a dual registration with the South African Nursing Council as a nurse-midwife. This leads to many qualified midwives not necessarily practising as midwives. It is therefore very difficult to calculate the number of practising midwives. 

Furthermore, the conflation of nursing and midwifery requires training as a generalist practitioner. Depending on the institution where they are trained, professional nurses may or may not comply with the International Confederation of Midwives’ Global Standards for education and regulation of the midwifery profession. 

Nevertheless, according to Dr Bekker’s research, midwifery is a disempowered profession, because the global guiding documents are neither considered by the regulatory authority nor the National Department of Health. There is a triple gap for competencies, coverage, and access: 

  • Insufficient numbers of competent midwives 

  • .. who can cover maternal health services 

  •  …who render services that address the needs of women 

There is a dire need for competent midwives in the country, but the predicament is that whilst midwifery educators are qualified, they are not necessarily clinical specialists, which ultimately jeopardises the quality of maternal healthcare. 

What was also clear from Bekker’s research is that although South Africa has a progressive constitution, gender equality has not materialised on grassroots level. Violence is ever present. Women are viewed as weaker, vulnerable, and less suited for the workplace. Nonconformity to sexual gender norms, based on cultural or religious bias, creates conflict for some women.  

Dr Deidre van Jaarsveldt, senior lecturer in the School of Nursing at the UFS, said Bekker’s study highlighted that feminism is a strengthening agency for women. In this study it was important to frame the context of midwifery as a disempowered, woman-led profession, caring for women who are still finding themselves in a society where there is gender inequality. 

The research indicated that there were many challenges: 

  • Lack of autonomy for midwives 

  • Non-compliance with the global midwifery standards 

  • Conflation of nursing and midwifery 

  • Midwifery regulated by non-midwives 

  • Lack of direct entry into midwifery education in the country 

  • High litigation in maternal and child healthcare – there is fearfulness among practitioners and reluctance to work within the midwifery profession 

In practice it is difficult to distinguish midwifery specialists from nurses who are practising as generalists and are expected to offer maternal healthcare services. If something goes wrong, the midwifery profession is held accountable, but practising midwives were not necessarily involved. 

Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub 

There is a dire need for midwifery to become an autonomous profession guided by global standards. Membership should be based on advanced qualifications, which strengthen midwifery as a speciality. This can only be attained through education and maintained by a regulatory body, as well as the de-conflation of midwifery from nursing. When this happens, midwives will know who the actual midwives are and be able to hold one another accountable, Motlolometsi adds. 

Dr Bekker advocated for the “decolonising” of midwifery, which means restoring the knowledge to the profession. To allow midwives to receive quality education, midwifery should become an independent profession that is guided by global standards and regulated by midwives.  

Van Jaarsveldt says the School of Nursing at the UFS endeavours to offer quality midwifery education. Students learn in a high-tech simulated learning environment where they can become competent before working with actual mothers and babies. The educators are clinical experts, supported by a team of midwifery practitioners who act as preceptors for the students. 

Before her untimely death, Dr Bekker started establishing a Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Hub in the Faculty of Health Sciences, which is continuing under the leadership of Dr Cynthia Spies, supported by a team of interprofessional experts.  

“Through research and continuous improvement of education and practice, this group of professionals envisions optimising and strengthening reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health competencies so that current maternal and child morbidity and mortality trends can improve resulting in surviving and thriving childrearing families.  

“The goal is to develop partnerships and opportunities for collaboration and research with colleagues in healthcare disciplines and to extend beyond healthcare to include innovative interdisciplinary partnerships,” says Spies. The objectives include:

  • Practice development with implementation of evidence-based practice and positive experience of the childbirth and child health continuum; 
  • Clinical competency development through training and the development of short learning programmes; 
  • Clinical research that addresses the current reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health mortality, morbidity and health issues in central South Africa.

News Archive

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy
2007-08-06

 

In her inaugural lecture Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Sciences, focused on the impact that Pan-Africanist sentiments have had on South Africa’s foreign policy. She also put the resulting contradictions and ambiguities into context. At her inaugural lecture were, from the left: Proff. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS), Heidi Hudson, Engela Pretorius (Vice-Dean: Faculty of The Humanities) and Daan Wessels (Research Associate in the Department of Political Science).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy

“We are committed to full participation as an equal partner … opposed to any efforts which might seek to project South Africa as some kind of superpower on our continent. … the people of Africa share a common destiny and must therefore … address their challenges … as a united force...” (Mbeki 1998:198-199).

Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Science referred to this statement made by president Mbeki (made at the opening of the OAU Conference of Ministers of Information in 1995) when she delivered her inaugural lecture on the topic: South African foreign policy: The politics of Pan-Africanism and pragmatism.

One of the questions she asked is: “Can the South African state deliver democracy and welfare at home while simultaneously creating a stable, rules-based African community?”

She answers: “South Africa needs to reflect more critically and honestly on the dualism inherent in its ideological assumptions regarding relations with Africa. South Africa will always be expected by some to play a leadership role in Africa. At the moment, South Africa’s desire to be liked is hampering its role as leader of the continent.”

In her lecture she highlighted the ideological underpinnings and manifestations of South Africa’s foreign policy. Throughout she alluded to the risks associated with single-mindedly following an ideologically driven foreign policy. She emphasised that domestic or national interests are the victims in this process.

Prof. Hudson offers three broad options for South Africa to consider:

  • The Predator – the selfish bully promoting South African economic interest.
  • Mr Nice Guy – the non-hegemonic partner of the African boys club, multilaterally pursuing a pivotal but not dominant role.
  • The Hegemon - South Africa driving regional integration according to its values and favouring some African countries over others, and with checks and balances by civil society.

She chooses option three of hegemony. “Politically correct research views hegemony as bad and partnership as good. This is a romanticised notion – the two are not mutually exclusive,” she said.

However, she states that there have to be prerequisites to control the exercise of power. “The promotion of a counter-hegemon, such as Nigeria, is necessary. Nigeria has been more effective in some respects than South Africa in establishing its leadership, particularly in West Africa. Also needed is that government should be checked by civil society to avoid it sinking into authoritarianism. The case of business and labour coming to an agreement over the HIV/Aids issue is a positive example which illustrates that government cannot ignore civil society. But much more needs to be done in this regard. South Africa must also be very careful in how it uses its aid and should focus potential aid and development projects more explicitly in terms of promoting political stability,” she said.

Prof. Hudson said: “It is also questionable whether Mbeki’s Afro-centrism has in fact promoted the interests of ordinary citizens across Africa. Instead, elite interests in some countries have benefited. But ultimately, the single most important cost is the damage done to the moral code and ethical principles on which the South African Constitution and democracy is founded.

“In the end we all lose out. More pragmatism and less ideology in our relations within Africa may just be what are needed,” she said.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept