Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
10 December 2021 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied

Two students, Jenny Josefsson and Janie Swanepoel in the Faculty of the Humanities at the University of the Free State (UFS), graduated with joint degrees during the December graduation ceremonies. 

Josefsson received her degree from both the UFS and Radboud University in Nijmegen in the Netherlands, and Swanepoel was awarded her degree by the UFS and the University of Cologne, Germany. 

According to the Office for International Affairs (OIA) at the UFS – with a joint degree, the candidate receives an academic qualification from more than one institution at the same time. 

Zenzele Mdletshe from the OIA explains that a student will register at two different institutions at the same time, with the goal of obtaining one qualification. “Upon completion, the home institution will issue a joint degree certificate while the host institution will issue a degree supplement. For both Josefsson and Swanepoel, the UFS was the home institution.”

The UFS also awarded two joint degrees in 2020.

Social change, inequality, and land issues

Josefsson, who was born in Sweden, matriculated at Ljusdals Gymnasieskola in 1997. She obtained both her Environmental Science and Development Studies degree and her cum laude master’s degree in Environmental Science at Södertörn University. As an exchange student, she spent one semester in 2006 at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, and two years later started her career as an environmental consultant in Cape Town. 

She proceeded to do her PhD, and as part of her academic journey towards completing her doctoral degree, she joined a group of doctoral students from South Africa and the Netherlands, whose research fell under a project titled ‘Farm Dwellers, the Forgotten People? Conversions to Conservation in KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape’. The Dutch science-funding organisation, NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development, funded the research. 

Based in the Department of Geography at the UFS, she continued with her research and started fieldwork in KwaZulu-Natal in 2013. During and after her fieldwork, she wrote several articles, which – together with an introductory chapter – formed the body of work submitted for her doctorate. 

Josefsson received her Doctor of Philosophy, specialising in Geography. The title of her study is: Battles over boundaries and belonging: violence, wilderness and spatial reconfigurations in the conversion of farm landscapes in KwaZulu-Natal, and highlights the ground-level politics of land issues. Her research is an important contribution to the wider debate around social change, inequality, and land issues in South Africa.

Her thesis was examined by the UFS according to South African examination procedures, and then by a body of examiners appointed by Radboud University. She defended her thesis during a Zoom session with Radboud University in October 2021.

Josefsson, who has worked on various projects in Southern Africa and South Asia, is currently working as a programme coordinator for a climate services project in the SADC region. 

Rethinking commercial ranching in rural Southern Africa

Completing school in Bloemfontein, Swanepoel obtained her BA at Stellenbosch University, and her BA Honours in Social Anthropology at the University of Cape Town. In 2013, she received her master’s degree in Social Anthropology at Stellenbosch University. 

Seven years later, she successfully submitted her PhD dissertation in Social Anthropology at the UFS. Her PhD forms part of a co-tutelage agreement with the University of Cologne.

Swanepoel, who is working in social compliance, received the Doctor of Philosophy with specialisation in Anthropology. The title of her dissertation is: In the land of the jackals: Postcolonial aridity in Southern Namibia. She investigates multispecies relations in a changing Namibian Boer community.

Her dissertation suggests the need to rethink commercial ranching in rural Southern Africa. “Given the glocal increase in aridity, this research shows the limitations of engaging with the decolonisation of land and the impact of climate change in ways that perpetuate the relation between nature and culture.”

She was invited to rework her dissertation into a book.

Advantages of joint degree

According to Mdletshe, there are several advantages to a joint degree. “The students involved in this programme have a chance of pursuing an international academic programme while enrolled at the UFS.”

He adds: “The students will also have a chance to be mentored and guided by supervisors from different institutions, bringing different perspectives. Such programmes will not only expose students to different lifestyles and cultures – as they will travel to the host institution from time to time – but it will also introduce them to different methods of teaching and learning.

He believes that with the input of international institutions, the joint degree will give students a competitive edge.

“We encourage students and academics who are interested in this programme to contact Kagiso Ngake (ngakekm@ufs.ac.za) or myself (mdletshezp@ufs.ac.za) in the Partnership Office at the Office for International Affairs,” says Mdletshe.

News Archive

2010 World Cup: An opportunity for nation-building
2010-05-11

Pictured from the left, front are: Prof. Labuschagne and Prof. Cornelissen. Back: Prof. Kersting, Prof. Teuns Verschoor (Acting Senior Vice-Rector: UFS) and Dr Ralf Hermann (DAAD).
Photo: Mangaliso Radebe

“The 2010 FIFA World Cup creates a window of opportunity for nation-building in South Africa that could even surpass the opportunity created by the 1995 Rugby World Cup.”

This was according to Prof. Pieter Labuschagne from the University of South Africa, who was one of the three speakers during the lecture series on soccer that were recently presented by the Faculty of the Humanities at the University of the Free State (UFS), in conjunction with the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), under the theme: Soccer and Nation Building.

Prof. Labuschagne delivered a paper on the topic, The 2010 Soccer World Cup in South Africa: Nation Building or White Apathy?, highlighting the critical issue of how sport in South Africa was still largely supported along racial lines.

“We are still enforcing the separateness of rugby as a sport for whites and soccer as a sport for blacks,” he said.

He said a high degree of animosity against soccer existed among whites because they felt rugby and cricket were being singled out by parliament as far as transformation was concerned. He said that could be the reason why a large number of South African whites still supported soccer teams from foreign countries instead of local Premier Soccer League teams.

“Bridging social context between different racial groups is still a major problem, even though patriotism is comparatively high in South Africa,” added Prof. Norbert Kersting from the University of Stellenbosch, who also presented a paper on World Cup 2010 and nation building from Germany to South Africa, drawing critical comparisons on issues of national pride and identity between the 2006 World Cup in Germany and the 2010 World Cup.

“Strong leadership is needed to utilize the opportunity provided by the 2010 World Cup to build national unity as former President Nelson Mandela did with the Rugby World Cup in 1995,” said Prof. Labuschagne.

Although acknowledging the power of sport as a unifying force, Prof. Scarlett Cornelissen, also from the University of Stellenbosch, said that, since 1995, the captivating power of sport had been used to achieve political aims and that the 2010 World Cup was no different.

Amongst the reasons she advanced for her argument were that the 2010 World Cup was meant to show the world that South Africa was a capable country; that the World Cup was meant to solidify South Africa’s “African Agenda” – the African Renaissance - and also to extend the idea of the Rainbow Nation; consolidate democracy; contribute to socio-economic development and legitimize the state.

“We should not place too much emphasis on the 2010 World Cup as a nation-building instrument,” she concluded.

She presented a paper on the topic Transforming the Nation? The political legacies of the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

The aim of the lecture series was to inspire public debate on the social and cultural dimensions of soccer.

DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst) is one of the world’s largest and most respected intermediary organisations in the field of international academic cooperation.
Media Release
Issued by: Mangaliso Radebe
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2828
Cell: 078 460 3320
E-mail: radebemt@ufs.ac.za  
11 May 2010
 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept