Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Nursing students taken to boot camp in innovative educational strategy

19 October 2021 | Story André Damons | Photo Charl Devenish

Dr Annali Fichardt and Dr Champion Nyoni — Dr Champion Nyoni and Dr Annali Fichardt, together with Prof Yvonne Botma (not on the picture), from the School of Nursing at the University of the Free State (UFS) came in second for their research paper on this innovative educational strategy at the recent Faculty of Health Sciences’ Faculty Research Forum.

When South Africa went into hard lockdown due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the School of Nursing at the University of the Free State (UFS) adopted the conventional boot camp as an innovative way to continue learning and teaching clinical skills for its students.

School of Nursing leadership adopting an innovative educational strategy

The COVID-19 pandemic, specifically the hard lockdown of 2020, challenged the leadership of the School of Nursing to adopt innovative educational strategies to continue learning and teaching, especially for undergraduate nursing students. Adapting theory classes to the online space appeared easier due to the various enabling modalities in the university such as Blackboard, but the same could not be said about learning clinical skills. It is near impossible to learn clinical skills at home. The School of Nursing had to devise ways to facilitate learning of clinical skills in campus during the pandemic. Underpinned by the theory of deliberate practice, they used the boot camp as an innovative educational strategy to continue the learning and teaching of clinical skills.

Dr Champion Nyoni, Dr Annali Fichardt and Prof Yvonne Botma, who did research on this innovative educational strategy, came in second place at the recent Faculty of Health Sciences’ Faculty Research Forum. They also won the Kerneels Nel medal for best educational research paper in 2020.

Manuscript already accepted

The manuscript about their research has already been accepted by The African Journal of Health Professions Education and will be published next year.

“Deliberate practice is understood as a type of purposeful and systematic learning of skills requiring focused attention and is conducted to improve performance. Boot camps are synonymous with conventional training camps, such as used in the military, where specific skills are learnt, and the School of Nursing adopted the practice for this particular situation,” wrote the researchers in the manuscript.

According to them, the boot camps had the dual aim of developing foundational clinical skills for undergraduate nursing students, including sessions missed during the higher levels of lockdown, and preparing them for the ‘new’ workplace environment.

Educational institutions were compelled to adapt their education strategies during the pandemic and the innovation of the use of boot camps as a strategy for learning and teaching clinical skills is an example of what the School of Nursing applied immediately after the hard lockdown.

How the boot camps worked

Each student year group was allocated a week at the simulation laboratory. Each year group was then split into smaller groups to attend their boot camp on specific days of the week. The module outcomes determined the nature and number of clinical skills to be taught per camp.

All the students received a video recording of the clinical skills and associated learning material prior to the boot camp to prepare for the session. On the day of the camp, the group was further split into smaller manageable groups, which were stationed in smaller venues of the simulation laboratory with a preceptor.

Equipment and materials related to the clinical skills for the day were made available in all the venues. A central venue hosted the leading session facilitator, who provided foundational information about the clinical skill before a demonstration while being live-streamed to the other smaller venues. Students in smaller venues watched the leading facilitator via live streaming after which they had opportunities for clarification from their preceptor. All the students in the small groups then demonstrated the taught skills to the preceptor who immediately provided feedback.

This intervention commenced after the hard lockdown and continued for the whole of the year 2020.

Outcomes of the strategy

The boot camps appeared to have influenced the learning and teaching of clinical skills positively, but the strategy is an emergency solution only in response to COVID-19 and is not regarded as suitable for long-term educational purposes. Students’ clinical outcomes appear to have improved compared to previous years and they appreciated the efforts taken by their educators in facilitating the learning of clinical skills and re-integrating them into the clinical environment.

“We always encourage our students to be innovative in their own practice, – the boot camps were an exceptional demonstration of practising what we preach,” says Dr Nyoni.

The infrastructure, the educators, and the leadership of the School of Nursing appeared to be enablers for the effective influence of this strategy. The boot camps were located at the state-of-the-art simulation facilities at the school that have multiple venues and facilities for live streaming. Teamwork among the educators in each year group drove the process through reflecting on their own practice.

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points

2004-07-29

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept