Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
18 April 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Stephen Collett
Prof Ted Kroon
Prof Ted Kroon from the Department of Physics recently delivered his inaugural lecture on the topic What’s the use of a rainbow on the UFS Bloemfontein Campus.

“A rainbow is a natural phenomenon, the result of the refraction and reflection of the sun’s rays in drops of rain. As far as mankind is concerned, it’s a perfectly useless object and won’t make anyone money. Yet the poet who said, My heart leaps up when I behold a rainbow in the sky, only put into word the feeling of wonder and excitement we all have when we see a rainbow.”

“Every day I see a rainbow in my work; I do not need to wait to see one in the sky,” says Prof Ted Kroon, Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of the Free State (UFS), who used this phenomenon to introduce the topic of his inaugural lecture: What’s the use of a rainbow. 

“Far from being only a colourful spectacle with no practical value, rainbows are useful – and lead to useful things,” he believes. 

According to Prof Kroon, one can find examples of real rainbows and rainbow analogies used not only in everyday life, but also in physics. “Besides it being familiar devices in literature, culture, and even marketing, studies of rainbows can yield practical engineering information and may even help us to find new habitable planets,” he says.

Inspired by the many uses of a rainbow

In his lecture, he discussed the basic features of natural rainbows and how they come about. He also explored how the rainbow gives meaning to colour, and how this relates to the temperature of objects. He looked at an array of instances where the rainbow is used; from depicting the life of a star to indicating that we are sick (a thermometer) or when we need to refill a gas cylinder.
Moreover, Prof Kroon pointed out that rainbows are used in computer chips, stress identification, and to transmit internet data through underwater cables of glass fibre. He also referred to how the rainbow was harnessed as an engineering tool to measure refractive index and characterise fine droplet sprays used in industry. 

He continues, “Remarkably, the science developed to understand the natural rainbow can be redirected and applied to the optical properties of metallic nanoparticles, allowing the development of nanotechnology. Knowing how the natural rainbow works and its limitations, better systems have been developed to produce rainbows. Such rainbows have been used to discover new elements and to determine the age of the universe.”

As a member of an international community of phosphor researchers who are privileged to work with rainbows every day, he has used them to study the light-emitting properties of materials doped with bismuth. With this project – an initiative with the African Laser Centre taking place between 2016 and 2021 – he collaborated with the University of Khartoum in Sudan and trained a number of its postgraduate students. “My role included the guidance of students and the measurement and interpretation of the light-emitting properties of the materials. Our research during this time, considering more than a dozen materials, was summarised in 34 scientific publications that contributed to a greater understanding of bismuth ions as light-emitting materials,” he explains. 

Developing new materials, efficient in emitting blue light

He has been developing luminescent materials since 2006, primarily for general lighting (fluorescent tubes and LEDs) and displays (television, computer, and cellphone screens), as well as niche applications in medical and forensic science. 

As part of his current research, he is examining the effect of plasmonic metal nanoparticles on phosphor light emission. He is also exploring materials that absorb infrared light but emit visible light. “For this, I would like to consider the long-term stability of such materials and develop new materials that are more efficient in emitting particularly blue light,” he says. 

Prof Kroon holds a C2 rating from the National Research Foundation and has published more than 150 articles and book chapters, obtaining a Scopus h-index of 26.

News Archive

UFS study shows playing time in Super Rugby matches decreasing
2016-12-19

Description: Super Rugby playing time Tags: Super Rugby playing time 

The study by Riaan Schoeman, (left), Prof Robert Schall,
and Prof Derik Coetzee from the University of the Free State
on variables in Super Rugby can provide coaches with
insight on how to approach the game.
Photo: Anja Aucamp

It is better for Super Rugby teams not to have the ball, which also leads to reduced overall playing time in matches.

This observation is from a study by the University of the Free State on the difference between winning and losing teams. Statistics between 2011 and 2015 show that Super Rugby winning teams kick more and their defence is better.

These statistics were applied by Riaan Schoeman, lecturer in Exercise and Sport Sciences, Prof Derik Coetzee, Head of Department: Exercise and Sport Sciences, and Prof Robert Schall, Department of Mathematics and Actuarial Sciences. The purpose of the study, Changes in match variables for winning and losing teams in Super Rugby from 2011 to 2015, was to observe changes. Data on 30 games (four from each team) per season, supplied by the Cheetahs via Verusco TryMaker Pro, were used.

About two minutes less action
“We found that the playing time has decreased. This is the time the ball is in play during 80 minutes,” says Schoeman. In 2011, the average playing time was 34.12 minutes and in 2015 it was 31.95.

“The winning team has less possession of the ball and doesn’t want it. They play more conservatively. They dominate with kicks and then they play,” says Prof Coetzee, who was the conditioning coach for the Springboks in 2007 when they won the World Cup.

Lineouts also more about kicking
As a result, the number of line-outs also increased (from 0.31 per minute in 2011 to 0.34 in 2015) and the winning teams are better in this regard.

“The winning team has less possession of the ball
and doesn’t want it. They play a more conservative
game. They dominate with kicks and then they play.”

Schoeman believes that rule changes could also have contributed to reduced playing time, since something like scrum work nowadays causes more problems. “When a scrum falls, the time thereafter is not playing time.”

According to Prof Coetzee, rucks and mauls have also increased, (rucks from 2.08 per minute in 2011 to 2.16 in 2015 and mauls from 0.07 per minute in 2011 to 0.10 in 2015). “The teams that win, dominate these areas,” he says.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept