Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
06 December 2022 | Story André Damons | Photo Sonia Small
Dr Nicholas Pearce
Prof Nicholas Pearce has joined the Faculty of Health Sciences’ management team after being appointed Head of the School of Clinical Medicine. Prof Pearce is the former Head of the Department of Surgery at the UFS and led the Universitas Hospital’s COVID-19 Task Team.

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Prof Nicholas Pearce led the COVID-19 Task Team of the Universitas Academic Hospital, ensuring that the hospital not only had enough Personal protective equipment (PPEs) and beds for patients, but also that the vaccination process ran smoothly. Now, the Best Doctor of the Year for 2022 – as named during this year’s National Annual Batho Pele Excellence Awards (NBPEA) – will lead the School of Clinical Medicine in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Free State (UFS).

Prof Pearce, former Head of the Department of Surgery at the UFS who served the faculty in multiple capacities over a long period, took up this position on 1 December 2022 – a position he is looking forward to.  

Create world-class doctors, maximise students’ full potential

“I’m excited about taking up my new position as Head of the School of Clinical Medicine. This is a role that comes with huge responsibility, and my vision is to create world-class doctors and to maximise each student’s full potential.  We, as university, are a national asset and need to grow and develop to be of service to the future of our country.  So, to lead a school with such a prestigious history is truly a privilege,” says Prof Pearce. 

According to him, the goal for the Medical School in the next five years should be determined by three main core drivers: service delivery, research, and teaching and training. He would like to be in a stronger position, with innovation that can produce world-class doctors (both undergraduate and postgraduate). 

If you look at the strategic plan of the UFS, says Prof Pearce, it is clear that, under the leadership of current Rector and Vice-Chancellor, Prof Francis Petersen, a period of regeneration and innovation is upon the university. Tied to this concept is the idea of self-evaluation and improvement. The idea of challenges and coming up with solutions excites him.  

“I think for a while, my main aim will be to bring the university, the provincial Department of Health, and the school in alignment, ensuring that we are all pulling in the same direction to achieve the same goal.”  

“At the end of the day, the goal here is to provide quality health care to the people of South Africa, while the Department of Health, the university, and society each function in different environments – coming together and understanding each other’s needs and having a common goal – excellent health care in this country for all our citizens.”

Lessons learned from surgery and running COVID-19 task teams

Prof Pearce, who was awarded the UFS Chancellor’s Medal for outstanding service during the April graduation ceremonies, says lessons learned from being both a surgeon and running COVID-19 task teams, are that strategic organisational processes need to be in place – systems strengthened, the policies and procedures adapted, and comprehensive planning taking place. 

However, he says, one must also bear in mind that we have a history of very high academic standards in the School of Clinical Medicine, so you want to improve on that rather than go backwards.

“I learned a lot from surgery and COVID-19 that will equip me in future. COVID-19 taught me about organisational management, disaster management, funding, resource management, people management skills, development, etc.  
“Running the Department of Surgery, one of the largest departments in the faculty with multiple inputs and personalities, has taught me that you are only as strong as the team behind you. I have an amazing team behind me in this new role, whether it is the dean, vice-dean, heads of department, administration, rectorate, and so forth.” 

He will continue to work at the Universitas Hospital; however, being fully employed by the university, he will only be doing some calls and working over weekends.  

“As a surgeon, theatre has always been my safe haven, my place of meditation, my place of peace, and I am sad to say goodbye to surgery and the Department of Surgery – it has been loyal, and I am grateful to everyone in the department; but I think as with all good things, there is a time to come and a time to go.”

News Archive

Protection of Information bill- opinions from our experts
2011-11-28

Prof. Hussein Solomon
Senior Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of the Free State. 

In recent years, given their failure to effectively govern, the ANC has become increasingly defensive. These defensive traits have become particularly acute in light of the various corruption scandals that members of the ruling party involve themselves in.
 
Given the fact that for now they are assured of an electoral majority (largely on account of their anti-apartheid credentials), coupled with the fact that they have managed to make parliament a rubber stamp of the executive as opposed to holding the executive accountable, it is the media which has increasingly held the ruling party to account by exposing such corruption and incompetence in government.
 
The passing of the information bill, therefore, is not merely an attack on the media, but an attack on the pivotal issue of accountability. Without accountability, there can be no democracy.
 
By defining national interest broadly, by refusing to accept a public interest clause in the bill, the ANC increasingly shows its disdain to South Africa's constitution and its citizens.
 
More importantly, as former Minister of Intelligence and ANC stalwart Ronnie Kasrils pointedly makes clear, the ANC is also betraying its own noble struggle against the odious apartheid regime. It was the media which played a key role in exposing apartheid's excesses, it is the same media which is coming under attack by the heirs of PW Botha's State Security Council - Minister of State Security Siyabong Cwele and his security apparatchiks whose mindsets reflect more Stalin's Gulag's than the values of the Freedom Charter.
 
The passing of this bill is also taking place at a time when journalists have had their phones attacked, where the judiciary has been deliberately undermined and parliament silenced.
 
Democrats beware!

 
Prof. Johann de Wet
Chairperson: Department of Communication Science 
 
The ANC’s insistence on passing the Protection of State Information Bill in its current form and enforcing it by law, means that the essence of our democratic state and the quality of life of every citizen is at stake.
 
Yes, our freedom as academics, researchers, mass media practitioners and citizens comes into play. Freedom implies the right to choose and is, along with equality, an underlying principle which helps make democracy happen. While the South African state needs to protect (classify) information which could threaten its security and/or survival, the omission of a public interest clause in the Bill at this stage effectively denies a citizen the right to freedom of information.
 
 Freedom of information, along with press freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association and religious freedom, are essential to democracy. These freedoms are granted because they conform to basic liberal ideas associated with (Western) democracy and which resonate with South Africa’s liberal constitution, such as (1) belief in the supreme value of the individual (and thus not of the state); (2) belief that the individual has natural rights (rights which belong to all human beings by nature – such as the right to life and to control government)) which exist independently of government, and which ought to be protected by and against government; and (3) recognition of the supreme value of the individual. 
 
One wonders how many cases of South African government corruption and mismanagement would have been uncovered by investigative journalists over the past number of years if this Bill in its current form was on the statute books. This Bill represents a backward step from the promise of democracy of having an informed public. The former National Party government had similar laws in place and one does not want to go there again. The infamous Information Scandal in South Africa of some thirty years ago, or Muldergate as it has come to be known, reminds one of what governments can do when it works clandestinely.
 
What South Africans need, is more information on what government structures are doing and how they are doing it with taxpayers’ money, not less information. While information in itself does not equal communication or dialogue, it is an indispensable part thereof, and the need for dialogue based on verifiable information is urgent for meeting vexed challenges facing South African communities. Academics in all fields of specialisation are constantly in need of untainted information to pursue answers and/or offer solutions to where South Africa should be moving in all spheres of life.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept