Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
16 February 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied
Unique PhD Journeys
Prof Liezel Lues and her two doctoral students on graduation day. On the left is Dr Modeni Sibande, who is looking forward to ensuring that Public Administration and Management remains relevant to contemporary evolving issues in society. On the right is Dr Maréve Biljohn, who as a student has always shown commitment to do her best in every aspect of her PhD journey.

In nature, one often comes across cool and surreal phenomena. Experiencing rare happenings in the academia is an altogether different encounter. One that Prof Liezel Lues, Professor in the Department of Public Administration and Management at the University of the Free State (UFS), explains as winning the lottery.

Two of Prof Lues’ doctoral students – representing two different institutions – graduated in 2018. Four years later, on the exact same date, 1 March 2022, Drs Maréve Biljohn and Modeni Sibanda will take up their new positions, respectively as Head of the Department of Public Administration and Management at the UFS and Head of the Department of Public Administration at the University of Fort Hare.

 

Social innovation and service delivery

Dr Biljohn, currently Senior Lecturer in the department, did her thesis on the topic: Social innovation and service delivery by local government: a comparative perspective. With work experience in local government, Dr Biljohn had a good idea of the problems that underpin poor service delivery in this sphere of government.

Public participation in integrated development planning: a case study of Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality, was the title of Dr Sibanda’s thesis. The study revealed how individuals and communities navigate forms of power and raise the critical consciousness of municipal residents, communities, and public officials.

According to Dr Sibanda, his study was motivated by the need to explore how public participation power dynamics influence Integrated Development Planning outcomes.

He believes by doing so, the complexity of how individuals and communities navigate forms of power in public participation platforms and spaces would be unravelled. Unravelling such public participation power dynamics, he says, would raise critical consciousness and address and challenge visible, hidden, and invisible forms of power on these public platforms and spaces. “Often public participation platforms and spaces neglect and ignore the capacity of such spaces to manage the pervasive, complex power dynamics among stakeholders in municipal strategic development planning processes. This focus to my PhD therefore sought to fill that knowledge gap,” adds Dr Sibanda.

Prof Lues says the value link to their research is buoyed in the South African Local Government. “They have both established a niche area that addresses the challenges South African municipalities face,” she adds.


“There is no doubt that they are suitable for the position of head of department at this point.”


Achieving a coveted status in their careers

On experiencing this unique journey, Prof Lues says: “Of all the relations, a relation between a promoter and a student is the most inspiring and admirable one. Any promoter takes the utmost pride when his/her taught students achieve coveted status in their respective careers. To me, it feels like winning the lottery – twice.”

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept