Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
11 November 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied
Community Psychology students engage with the teaching and support staff at Lettie Fouché School
Community Psychology students engage with the teaching and support staff at Lettie Fouché School as part of their recent community service-learning project.

Transforming lives through quality, impact, and care – reads the essence of the University of the Free State (UFS). However, this phrase can also be used to describe the work of honours students in the Department of Psychology’s Community Psychology module with the Lettie Fouché School. 
 
The Department of Psychology has a long-standing relationship with the Lettie Fouché School in Bloemfontein through the former therapeutic horse-riding programme with foundation phrase learners at the school. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the project was put on hold. 

Promoting teacher well-being

Lecturer in the Department of Psychology, Dr Pravani Naidoo, says that community partners at Lettie Fouché have expressed a desire to continue their partnership with the university. This resulted in students seeking alternative ways to meaningfully interact with the school.

They have embraced podcasts as a form of e-service learning to promote the well-being of teachers and support staff, including hostel caregivers and therapists. The podcasts allowed the students to present their interventions in a practical and easily accessible way.

To determine the needs of the staff, the students engaged in a face-to-face needs assessment process with key stakeholders from the school, including Liana van Heerden, the Head of Occupational Therapy, and Charmaine de Waal, the Social Worker. This was followed by a needs assessment process on Google Forms, where staff answered questions related to their needs. They found that staff is experiencing challenges such as poor communication skills and conflict, which can often result in low levels of productivity and job satisfaction.

The students – informed by what they have learned in class theoretically and based on the needs assessment outcomes as part of their community intervention programme – identified self-compassion, character strengths, effective communication, and self-regulation towards conflict management as topics to address via their podcasts. These strategies are aimed at equipping and empowering the group of teachers to uphold good mental health and a healthy working environment.

The students prepared podcast transcripts, which were recorded in the new KovsieFM recording studio by Gerben van Niekerk from Kovsie Support Services. The podcasts were shared with the Lettie Fouché staff group via email. After receiving a request, they also made the recordings more widely available to occupational therapists and social workers at other schools in the Free State. The Lettie Fouché staff felt that the podcasts were of such high quality and relevance that it should be shared with their colleagues.

This initiative had the support of the school principal, Alexander Jordaan. 

Via Google Forms and informal focus groups, the staff group provided their feedback on the podcasts to students. The focus groups, where Jordaan indicated his and the school’s support for the partnership, were arranged by the school. 

During these sessions, the students were commended for producing professionally recorded podcasts, which were not too long and were easy to listen to. The staff also indicated that they had started practising many of the tools that the students shared with them to promote their well-being.

Students learning valuable lessons 

One of the students, Felicia Sibambo, reported that she herself picked up many valuable lessons during this learning opportunity. “Participating in this community project improved my knowledge, skills, and experience. I am now more careful about what I say and how I say it, and I can pause before I speak, because I am aware that communication is one of the factors that affect conflict.”

Regarding her interactions with the school group, Felicia says, “I have acquired from them the qualities they portray, such as being kind, joyful, united, compassionate – the list is endless. I hope that they maintain that wonderful energy. It has been a lovely experience.”

Eden-Lee Mohr, who believes that it is important to be considerate and kind, was a member of the group that focused on communication skills and conflict management. She says the podcast not only helped the teachers; it also helped her. She says she also learned a lot about herself in this process.

According to Konaye Masiba, who learned to see things from different perspectives, this project has facilitated her personal growth. She states: “Working on this project was an advantage for me, because I gained knowledge concerning teamwork, time management, and the importance of communication.” 

Rihani Lombard, who felt out of her comfort zone during the project, says she was once again reminded of the importance of prioritising her mental health. She also implemented the information that she shared with the Lettie Fouché work group in her own life.

Delmariè Cilliers says the project has made her more aware of the community and how to assess their needs. “Don’t assume their needs. It is very important to hear the community's voice and then act on their voice,” she says. 

Podcasts adding value in e-service learning

Despite being a teaching tool equipping students in the Community Psychology module, the project greatly benefited the Lettie Fouché work group. They only had positive feedback to share with the students, especially about the format in which the information was shared. Van Heerden says the podcasts helped them to listen to the information at any time in any place. The topics covered were also relevant, they indicated. They also felt that the strategies shared with them, including self-regulation, practising self-compassion and mindfulness, were easy to learn. 

She adds: “Besides equipping us to deal with day-to-day communication and conflict challenges, the Lettie Fouché staff appreciated the podcasts as it also reminded us about the importance of taking care of our own well-being. The group has without a doubt succeeded in their goal: promoting teacher wellness.”

News Archive

Position statement: Recent reporting in newspapers
2014-10-03

 

You may have read reports in two Afrikaans newspapers, regarding recent events at the University of the Free State (UFS). Sadly, those reports are inaccurate, one-sided, exaggerated and based not on facts, but on rumour, gossip and unusually personal attacks on members of the university management.

Anyone who spends 10 minutes on our Bloemfontein Campus would wonder what the so-called ‘crisis’ is about.

We are left with no choice other than to consider legal action, as well as the intervention of the South African Press Ombudsman, among other steps, to protect the good name of the institution and the reputation of its staff. No journalist has the right to launch personal and damaging attacks on a university and its personnel, whatever his or her motives, without being fair and factual. In this respect, the newspapers have a case to answer.

But here are the facts in relation to the reports:

  1. No staff member, whether junior or senior, is ever suspended without hard evidence in hand. Such actions are rare, and when done, are preceded by careful reviews of our Human Resource Policies, labour legislation and both internal and external legal advice. Then, and only then, is a suspension affected. A suspension, moreover, does not mean you are guilty and is a precautionary action to allow for the disciplinary investigation and process to be conducted, especially where there is a serious case to answer.
  2. At no stage was the Registrar instructed to leave the university; this is patently false and yet reported as fact. We specifically responded to the media that the Registrar does outstanding work for the university and that it is our intention for him to remain as our Registrar through the end of his contract in 2016.
  3. The Rector does not make decisions by himself. Senior persons, from the position of Dean, upwards, are appointed by statutory and other senior committees of the university and finally approved by Council. No rector can override the decision of a senior committee, and this has not happened at the UFS even in cases where the Rector serves as Chair of that committee. The impression of heavy-handed management at the top insults all our committee structures, including the Institutional Forum – the widest and most inclusive of stakeholder bodies at a university – which reports directly to Council on fairness and compliance of selection processes.
  4. In the case of senior appointments, Council makes the final decision. Council fully supports the actions taken on senior appointments, including a recent senior suspension. The fact that one Council member resigns just before the end of his term, whatever the real reason for this action, does not deter from the fact that the full Council in its last sitting approved the major staffing decisions brought before it. The image therefore that the two newspapers try to create of great turmoil and distress at the university, is completely unfounded.

Even if we wanted to, the university obviously cannot provide details about staffing decisions, especially disciplinary actions in process, since the rights of individuals should be protected in terms of the Human Resource Policies and procedures of the UFS. But that does not give any newspaper the right to speculate or state as fact that which is based on rumour or gossip, or to slander senior personnel of the university. For these reasons, we have been forced to seek legal remedy and correction as a matter of urgency.

Make no mistake, underlying much of the criticism of the university has been a distress about transformation at the UFS; in particular, the perception is created that white colleagues are losing their jobs. The evidence points in the opposite direction. Our progress with equity has been slow and we lag far behind most of the former white universities; that is a fact. More than 90% of our professors are white; most of our senior appointments at professorial level and as heads of department are still overwhelmingly white. Reasonable South Africans would agree that our transformation still has a long way to go and only the mean-spirited would contend otherwise. But based on the two Afrikaans newspaper reports, an impression is left of the aggressive rooting out of white colleagues.

In the past few years the academic standard of the university has significantly improved. We now have the highest academic pass rates in years, in part because we raised the academic standards for admission four years ago. We now have the highest rate of research publications, and among the highest national publication rate of scholarly books, in the history of the UFS. We have one of the most stable financial situations of any university in South Africa, with a strong balance sheet and growing financial reserves way beyond what we had before. We now attract top professors from around the country and other parts of the world, and we have the highest number of rated researchers, through the National Research Foundation, than ever before. And after the constant turmoil of a number of years ago, we now have one of the most stable campuses in South Africa. Those are the facts.

The UFS is also regarded around the world as a university that has become a model of transformation and reconciliation in the student body. The elections of our Student Representative Council are only the most visible example of how far we have come in our leadership diversity. Not a week goes by in which other universities, nationally and abroad, do not come to Kovsies to consult with us on how they can learn from us and deepen their own transformations, especially among students.

Rather than focus on what more than one senior journalist, in reference to the article in Rapport of 21 September 2014, rightly called ‘a hatchet job’ on persons and the university, here are the objective findings of a recent survey of UFS stakeholders: 92% endorse our values; 77% agree with our transformation; 78% believe we are inclusive; and 78% applaud our overall reputation index.  Those are very different numbers from a few years ago when the institution was in crisis.

This is our commitment to all our stakeholders: we will continue our model of inclusive transformation which provides opportunities for study and for employment for all South Africans, including international students and colleagues. We remain committed to our parallel-medium instruction in which Afrikaans remains a language of instruction; we are in fact the only medical school in the country that offers dual education and training in both Afrikaans and English for our students - not only English. We provide bursaries and overseas study opportunities to all our students, irrespective of race. And our ‘future professors’ programme is richly diverse as we seek the academic stars of the future.

We are not perfect as a university management or community. Where we make mistakes, we acknowledge them and try to do better the next time round. But we remain steadfast in our goal of making the UFS a top world university in its academic ambitions and its human commitments.

END

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept