Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
19 October 2022 | Story Leonie Bolleurs
Dr Pieter du Toit
Dr Pieter du Toit, President of the Convocation, recently addressed more than 200 Convocation members at the Annual General Meeting.

What if you knew there was a body whose endeavours sought to be dynamic and engaging, promote excellence, welcome inclusion, and serve its alma mater?

One of the aims of the UFS Convocation – a body of more than 40 000 members – is to pay close attention to and engage on matters pertaining to governance, administration, and academic affairs at the University of the Free State (UFS).

This entity seeks to ensure that the research outputs of the university are communicated in a positive light, and that feedback is provided to ensure that the current academic programmes are adequate to enhance graduate employability. Among their goals is to provide a forum for unemployed graduates to share their skills, expertise, and abilities.

Furthermore, this body attempts to establish dialogue around social issues and ongoing transformation.

 

Fostering a spirit of belonging

According to Dr Pieter du Toit, President of the UFS Convocation, it is important for this structure that it stays relevant to its members and society and that it fosters a spirit of belonging. He recently addressed members on the UFS Bloemfontein Campus at the Annual General Meeting, the first to be held in the past two years. Besides the in-person attendance, the meeting was also attended by more than 200 members via livestream.

Dr Du Toit explained to members – which, according to legislation, include all persons who have obtained a formal qualification from the UFS, as well as all permanent academic staff members that the Convocation strives to promote a positive image of the UFS, advancing and safeguarding its reputation.

Also speaking at the AGM was the UFS Rector and Vice-Chancellor, Prof Francis Petersen. He reflected on the state of the UFS, talking about the past five years to date. He touched on matters pertaining to the core functions of the university, including teaching and learning, research and internationalisation, and engaged scholarship.

As stated in its vision, the UFS strives to be a research-led, student-centred, and regionally engaged university in Bloemfontein, the Free State, South Africa, and the continent.

In the past five years, the UFS’ framework of guidance has been the Integrated Transformation Plan, which endeavoured to emphasise social justice; the UFS Strategic Plan, the focus of which was to enhance the scope of transformation by following a holistic approach; and the Vice-Chancellor’s Strategic projects, aimed at creating a high-performance institution. “To be able to do what you need to do, you have to be at the top of your game,” said Prof Petersen.

In addition, the UFS has also been guided by the University Risk Management Committee and the Institutional Multi-stakeholder Group, which is a safe space that impacts the progression of an inclusive culture of belonging at the UFS.

Prof Petersen also referred to the 2020/2021 period during the COVID-19 pandemic. “There were three imperatives to which the UFS was committed during this period – the health and safety of staff and students, ensuring that no staff member or student was left behind, and successfully completing the 2020/2021 academic year,” stated Prof Petersen.

According to him, the university has engaged in different strategies to ensure that students were not left behind academically, and that committed staff did not overextend themselves. “We have dealt with it in such a way that our success rate for undergraduate studies has improved, which indicates the resilience of our students and the commitment of our staff,” he said.

The UFS is one of the nation's top universities for student success.

 

Optimising our research capacity

Two of the research successes of this year were an increase in research outputs and in the number of postgraduate students. The university is also working towards increasing the number of academic staff with PhDs, as well as its number of postdoctoral fellows. “We are looking at optimising our research capacity,” stated Prof Petersen.

Regarding engaged scholarship, Prof Petersen believes that if you cannot positively impact society through teaching and learning and research, you should ask why you exist as a university.

“We as a university is in a good place and I think you can be very proud of your alma mater,” he said.

For the way forward, the university is working on Vision130 (a strategy spanning over 12 years). “The vision will be quite bold, including goals for 75% of academic staff to have obtained their PhDs, a bigger focus on the postgraduate programme, and to be one of the top-five institutions in the country and one of the top-600 in the world. We will also reduce our student numbers to around 35 000, because we believe this is the number that we should be focusing on,” stated Prof Petersen.

“As members of the Convocation, I ask you to find a place in Vision130, to see how you can contribute to make this university a better institution than it is today,” he added.

Concluding his presentation, Prof Petersen told members of the Convocation, “You are immensely important to us as a university – you are the continuity between the past and the present as well as the future.”

Full-time UFS staff and alumni are welcome to contact the President of the Convocation with suggestions at convocation@ufs.ac.za

 

 

What is the Convocation?

  • It is important for the Convocation that it stays relevant to its members and society and that it fosters a spirit of belonging for alumni by keeping the communication channels with members open.
  • The Convocation strives to promote a positive image of the UFS, advancing and safeguarding its reputation.
  • The Convocation seeks to ensure that the research outputs of the university are communicated in a positive light, and that feedback is provided to ensure that the current academic programmes are adequate to enhance graduate employability.
  • Furthermore, this body attempts to establish dialogue around social issues and ongoing transformation.
  • In addition to promoting the institution's business and community interests, this structure aims to instil respect for the UFS.
  • Its goal is to instil in alumni a sense of responsibility, obligation, and accountability towards the community in general and to their alma mater in particular.

 Who is part of the Convocation?

  • All persons who have obtained a formal qualification from the UFS, as well as all permanent academic staff members.

 How often does the Convocation meet?

  • The Convocation sees to it that members meet at least once every two years.


News Archive

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy
2007-08-06

 

In her inaugural lecture Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Sciences, focused on the impact that Pan-Africanist sentiments have had on South Africa’s foreign policy. She also put the resulting contradictions and ambiguities into context. At her inaugural lecture were, from the left: Proff. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS), Heidi Hudson, Engela Pretorius (Vice-Dean: Faculty of The Humanities) and Daan Wessels (Research Associate in the Department of Political Science).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy

“We are committed to full participation as an equal partner … opposed to any efforts which might seek to project South Africa as some kind of superpower on our continent. … the people of Africa share a common destiny and must therefore … address their challenges … as a united force...” (Mbeki 1998:198-199).

Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Science referred to this statement made by president Mbeki (made at the opening of the OAU Conference of Ministers of Information in 1995) when she delivered her inaugural lecture on the topic: South African foreign policy: The politics of Pan-Africanism and pragmatism.

One of the questions she asked is: “Can the South African state deliver democracy and welfare at home while simultaneously creating a stable, rules-based African community?”

She answers: “South Africa needs to reflect more critically and honestly on the dualism inherent in its ideological assumptions regarding relations with Africa. South Africa will always be expected by some to play a leadership role in Africa. At the moment, South Africa’s desire to be liked is hampering its role as leader of the continent.”

In her lecture she highlighted the ideological underpinnings and manifestations of South Africa’s foreign policy. Throughout she alluded to the risks associated with single-mindedly following an ideologically driven foreign policy. She emphasised that domestic or national interests are the victims in this process.

Prof. Hudson offers three broad options for South Africa to consider:

  • The Predator – the selfish bully promoting South African economic interest.
  • Mr Nice Guy – the non-hegemonic partner of the African boys club, multilaterally pursuing a pivotal but not dominant role.
  • The Hegemon - South Africa driving regional integration according to its values and favouring some African countries over others, and with checks and balances by civil society.

She chooses option three of hegemony. “Politically correct research views hegemony as bad and partnership as good. This is a romanticised notion – the two are not mutually exclusive,” she said.

However, she states that there have to be prerequisites to control the exercise of power. “The promotion of a counter-hegemon, such as Nigeria, is necessary. Nigeria has been more effective in some respects than South Africa in establishing its leadership, particularly in West Africa. Also needed is that government should be checked by civil society to avoid it sinking into authoritarianism. The case of business and labour coming to an agreement over the HIV/Aids issue is a positive example which illustrates that government cannot ignore civil society. But much more needs to be done in this regard. South Africa must also be very careful in how it uses its aid and should focus potential aid and development projects more explicitly in terms of promoting political stability,” she said.

Prof. Hudson said: “It is also questionable whether Mbeki’s Afro-centrism has in fact promoted the interests of ordinary citizens across Africa. Instead, elite interests in some countries have benefited. But ultimately, the single most important cost is the damage done to the moral code and ethical principles on which the South African Constitution and democracy is founded.

“In the end we all lose out. More pragmatism and less ideology in our relations within Africa may just be what are needed,” she said.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept