Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
28 February 2023 | Story Edzani Nephalela | Photo Edzani Nephalela
Dr Luyanda Marhaya
Dr Luyanda Marhaya, Director of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance at the UFS.

Dr Luyanda Marhaya, Director of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance at the University of the Free State (UFS), has been selected by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) to join the Foundation Provision Reference Group (FPRG). His primary role in this position is to assist the Department in assessing applications for foundation programmes submitted by universities, ensuring compliance with the current Foundation Provision Guidelines. 

As the author of the book Does Extended Programme Provision Work in South Africa?, Dr Marhaya is a recognised expert in the field. 

The Department of Communication and Marketing (DCM) at the UFS recently interviewed Dr Marhaya to understand his responsibilities better:

Can you tell us more about your appointment as a member of the FPRG?

Over and above the supportive role, one of the major issues I will be involved in will be to provide input into the revision and finalisation of the Extended Curriculum Programme Policy Framework for the higher sector in South Africa.

What kind of projects or initiatives do you see being a priority?

One of the significant ongoing projects will be evaluating applications for foundation programmes of the different universities in South Africa, so one will have to allocate time, as many universities currently offer these programmes.

What do you hope to bring to the table as a group member?

Interestingly, I started as an academic about 15 years ago in the foundation programmes. I spent a good five years of my teaching at a university level dealing with students who gained entry through foundation programmes. I completely understand their purpose, intentions, and significance, especially concerning student access and success. 

How will the Foundation Provision Reference Group benefit students and the education system?

Student access is a serious issue in South Africa, especially regarding the preparedness of many university students. So, I believe if we develop guidelines that can assist universities in coordinating these programmes in a well-structured manner, there could be many benefits.

What challenges do you anticipate facing in this role, and how do you plan to address them?

I think the major issue will be time constraints. My role is very demanding, and I am already involved in several other external committees, such as the Council on Higher Education, so I think my time management has to be very good.

How do you plan to work with other group members to achieve the group’s goals?

I believe in lifelong learning. I will certainly contribute, but the value of these interactions comes from learning from others.

Can you discuss any past experiences that have prepared you for this role?

I also wrote a book, titled Does Extended Programme Provision Work in South Africa?, in which I explored all the intricacies around these programmes. As Director: Academic Planning at the UFS, I also oversee the quality and provision of foundation programmes, so you could say I bring some expertise.

What are your long-term goals for the foundation programmes, and your role as a reference group member?

I foresee this as a long-term service that will benefit the country as a whole, so I suppose the Department will keep up so that we can provide capacity development to all universities that offer foundation programmes.

News Archive

UFS academics present papers at major conference
2009-07-23

 
Pictured from the left are: Prof Neethling, Prof Edna van Harte (Dean of the Faculty of Military Science, Stellenbosch University), Dr Thomas Mandrup (from the Royal Danish Defence College and co-organiser of the conference), and Prof Heidi Hudson.
Photo: Supplied


Prof Theo Neethling from the Department of Political Science was recently invited to address a conference on the theoretical basis for states’ use of military instruments of force and scholarly progress in the understanding of armed conflict in Africa held at Stellenbosch University (SU) on 11 and 12 June 2009. This conference, themed Strategic Theory and Contemporary Africa Conflicts, was presented by the Faculty of Military Science of SU in collaboration with the Faculty of Military and Strategic Studies of the Royal Danish Defence College in Copenhagen. The conference was premised on the point that the way in which states choose to become involved in, orchestrate or oppose armed conflicts in terms of peace intervention action, normally originates from theoretical thinking well-grounded in a national strategy. This was the first conference in South Africa that focused on the nature of such a national strategy, but also on how the incidence of recent armed conflicts in Africa could be explained in terms of this theoretical thinking. In view of this Prof Neethling’s paper was titled, “UN peacekeeping operations in Africa: Reflections on developments, trends and the way forward”. His paper focused on recent and current UN peacekeeping operations with special reference to multinational challenges in the African context.


Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Centre for African Studies also attended the conference in Stellenbosch on Strategic Theory and Contemporary Africa Conflicts. In addition she was invited to present a paper at the Peacekeeping Africa 2009 conference held on 24 and 25 June 2009 at Gallagher Estate, Midrand. The event brings together individuals who are experts in defence, peacekeeping, policing, foreign service and other government bodies to share knowledge and to discuss the latest developments. This year’s conference was attended by more than 100 experts from all over Africa, with strong representation from the UN and the International Red Cross. Prof. Hudson’s paper was entitled “Peacebuilding through a gender lens”. Her presentation examined lessons learnt with regard to implementation of a gender perspective in Côte d’Ivoire and Rwanda. These case studies point towards an empirical link between women’s inclusion in peace processes and the quality of peace finally achieved. Prof. Hudson warned that inattention to the differential needs of both women and men during conflict and in the post-conflict reconstruction phase may perpetuate the violence discourses which sustained the conflict in the first place.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept