Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
28 February 2023 | Story Edzani Nephalela | Photo Edzani Nephalela
Dr Luyanda Marhaya
Dr Luyanda Marhaya, Director of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance at the UFS.

Dr Luyanda Marhaya, Director of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance at the University of the Free State (UFS), has been selected by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) to join the Foundation Provision Reference Group (FPRG). His primary role in this position is to assist the Department in assessing applications for foundation programmes submitted by universities, ensuring compliance with the current Foundation Provision Guidelines. 

As the author of the book Does Extended Programme Provision Work in South Africa?, Dr Marhaya is a recognised expert in the field. 

The Department of Communication and Marketing (DCM) at the UFS recently interviewed Dr Marhaya to understand his responsibilities better:

Can you tell us more about your appointment as a member of the FPRG?

Over and above the supportive role, one of the major issues I will be involved in will be to provide input into the revision and finalisation of the Extended Curriculum Programme Policy Framework for the higher sector in South Africa.

What kind of projects or initiatives do you see being a priority?

One of the significant ongoing projects will be evaluating applications for foundation programmes of the different universities in South Africa, so one will have to allocate time, as many universities currently offer these programmes.

What do you hope to bring to the table as a group member?

Interestingly, I started as an academic about 15 years ago in the foundation programmes. I spent a good five years of my teaching at a university level dealing with students who gained entry through foundation programmes. I completely understand their purpose, intentions, and significance, especially concerning student access and success. 

How will the Foundation Provision Reference Group benefit students and the education system?

Student access is a serious issue in South Africa, especially regarding the preparedness of many university students. So, I believe if we develop guidelines that can assist universities in coordinating these programmes in a well-structured manner, there could be many benefits.

What challenges do you anticipate facing in this role, and how do you plan to address them?

I think the major issue will be time constraints. My role is very demanding, and I am already involved in several other external committees, such as the Council on Higher Education, so I think my time management has to be very good.

How do you plan to work with other group members to achieve the group’s goals?

I believe in lifelong learning. I will certainly contribute, but the value of these interactions comes from learning from others.

Can you discuss any past experiences that have prepared you for this role?

I also wrote a book, titled Does Extended Programme Provision Work in South Africa?, in which I explored all the intricacies around these programmes. As Director: Academic Planning at the UFS, I also oversee the quality and provision of foundation programmes, so you could say I bring some expertise.

What are your long-term goals for the foundation programmes, and your role as a reference group member?

I foresee this as a long-term service that will benefit the country as a whole, so I suppose the Department will keep up so that we can provide capacity development to all universities that offer foundation programmes.

News Archive

UFS responds on the outcome of the court case in the alleged attack by Cobus Muller and Charl Blom on Gwebu
2014-09-09

The management of the University of the Free State (UFS) acknowledges the finding issued on 4 September 2014 by the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) that it was “unable to find any corroborating evidence to make a conclusive finding of racism and violation of human rights” in the Muzi Gwebu case.

The university management also takes cognisance of the ruling in the Bloemfontein Regional Court by Regional Magistrate Rasheed Matthews today (9 September 2014) that both Cobus Muller and Charl Blom are found not guilty on all the charges which included reckless driving, crimen injuria, attempted murder and assault (Muller), and a charge of assault (Blom). We note the Magistrate’s concerns about “inconsistencies in the evidence and exaggerations”, that the complainant “displayed hostility throughout the trial” and that he was “not a reliable witness and is prejudiced.” And therefore, in the words of the Magistrate to the defendants, “I’ve decided to give you the benefit of the doubt.”

Both Muller and Blom were suspended from all campuses of the UFS on 19 February 2014 based on the evidence available at the time of reckless driving, assault and other charges. This evidence was further borne out by an internal investigation into the incident of 17 February 2014 on the Bloemfontein Campus. In the light of the evidence available to us at the time, and the volatile situation on campus in the days following the attack, the UFS management believes that it was the correct decision to suspend the students, given the serious nature of the charges, and pending a decision of the courts.

In the light of both the SAHRC ruling as the Regional Court ruling, the university management has decided to take the following steps:

1.    The suspensions of both Muller and Blom from all campuses of the university are lifted with immediate effect.

2.    Muller may attend a forthcoming graduation ceremony during which the degree BSc Construction Management will be officially conferred upon him. He completed all the requirements for the degree in 2013, but was not allowed to attend the graduation ceremony of 11 April 2014 due to his suspension and the fact that the criminal charges were still pending.

3.    Blom may return to the university to complete his studies.

4.    The UFS is in discussion with the parents of one of the students and, if required, would also meet with legal counsel of the university, as well as those of students Muller and Blom to discuss any further steps given the outcome of the court case.

5.    In short, on grounds of the ruling by die SAHRC, as well as the Bloemfontein Regional Court, the university will not continue with its disciplinary action against Muller and Blom.

Prof Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor and Rector of the UFS said: “This has been a very difficult time for the university and I am pleased to record that throughout the crisis, the student body on the Bloemfontein Campus showed remarkable restraint and discipline, confirming also the broad, non-racial character of the peaceful protests that followed. Our student body has matured and our campus cultures are much more inclusive and transformed as a result of the quality and depth of student leadership over the past few years. The new Student Representative Council (SRC) is a splendid example of this – with the first black woman President (Mosa Leteane) and the first blind woman SRC student leader (Louzanne Coetzee).”

“I am pleased that the matter is now behind us and, again, we rest with the decisions of the Commission and the Courts as final,” he said.

Prof Jansen also apologised on behalf of the UFS to Cobus Muller and Charl Blom, their parents, and their families, for the disruption that the suspension brought in their lives and for the stress they had to bear during this difficult period. “For that, I am truly sorry,” he said.


Issued by: Lacea Loader (Director: Communication and Brand Management)
Tel: +27 (0) 51 401 2584 | +27 (0) 83 645 2454
E-mail: news@ufs.ac.za

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept