Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
06 July 2023 | Story Gerda-Marié van Rooyen | Photo Supplied
Prof Ivan Turok and Prof Melanie Walker
Prof Ivan Turok and Prof Melanie Walker.

Two of the University of the Free State (UFS) SARChI Research Chairs have been included in the 2nd edition of Research.com ranking of the best scholars in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Prof Melanie Walker from the UFS Higher Education and Human Development research group and SARChI Chair: Higher Education and Human Development, and Prof Ivan Turok, from the South African National Research Foundation, who hold the Research Chair in Strengthening Urban Economies: People, Place, Production and Policy, are ranked 41st (ranked 5 286 in the world) and 20th (2 825) in South Africa respectively.

According to the Research.com website, the best scientists ranking is a credible list of leading scientists from the field of Social Sciences and Humanities, established by means of a meticulous analysis of 166 880 scholars determined from multiple bibliometric data sources. For this discipline, as many as 15 317 researchers were analysed and their position in the ranking is based on a researcher’s D-index (Discipline H-index), which only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline.

The success of a community

As a SARChI Chair in Strengthening Urban Economies: People, Place, Production, and Policy, Prof Turok explores how cities can drive economic growth and foster inclusive development in South Africa. His research analyses the factors contributing to the success of certain cities over others and identifies policies and practices that can enhance conditions for citizens and communities

He says this “pleasant surprise” (being ranked 20th in South Africa in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities) follows years of scientific work and writing.

“Research has also been a labour of love and rewarding in itself. It has fuelled my natural curiosity for learning more about the world, and I have had opportunities to visit places and meet people I would never have had otherwise,” says Prof Turok.

What it takes to be a researcher

Although one can learn the required skills and capabilities to be a good researcher, Prof Turok says having a natural yearning for knowledge and an intrinsic curiosity about the real world is helpful to have a long research career. “Careful mentoring and sound teachers are vital to become an effective researcher.”

He firmly believes research should be relevant to the society in which it is located – especially in a developing country like South Africa.

He continues by saying: “It should shed light on and help to understand the major problems and opportunities facing society, using the tools and techniques available to that particular discipline.” This honoured researcher says researchers should inform societies using simple terms and engage in discussions on matters it faces.

“Researchers should be outward-looking and interact constructively with policy-makers and practitioners to improve public policy while maintaining a healthy dose of scepticism about the intentions of the political elite and other powerful interests.”

When analysing the reasons behind varying levels of economic growth and inclusive development among cities, it is crucial to consider a diverse range of indicators. “Relying solely on a few narrow indicators can be misleading," says Prof Turok.

Indicators to take into consideration include: The economic productivity of the city (output per person) and the average income level, the level of employment in relation to the working-age population, which enables individuals to support themselves and their families financially, and the level of investment, which determines future growth, employment, and income levels.

The value of research

Prof Turok suggests that the government could play a significant role in strengthening urban economies and reducing inequalities by devolving more powers and resources to metropolitan municipalities as the effective coordination of housing and transportation investments is crucial for achieving economic growth and social inclusion in cities. He also recommends aligning the programmes and investment projects of provincial authorities and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with those of the metropolitan areas.

“Currently, there is a disconnect between the activities of many SOEs and the interests of cities. For example, there is a considerable amount of vacant and underused land in well-located urban areas owned by SOEs, which they refuse to transfer to metros for housing purposes (highlighting the relevance of land reform in cities). Another example is the Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs), which operate in silos and do not align their training programmes with the needs of employers in cities,” explains Turok.

Being an internationally recognised expert in his field, Prof. Turok is regularly asked to advise esteemed organisations such as the United Nations and the African Development Bank. Prof. Turok, a former finalist for the National Science and Technology Forum (NSTF) Lifetime Achievement Award in 2021, will serve in this significant role until 2025.

Focusing on Education

Prof Walker, a distinguished scholar in the field of education sciences with an A1 rating from the National Research Foundation (NRF) – which funds SARChI – focuses on the profound impact of apartheid on education and civic life. She concentrates on (higher) education, primarily in the Global South, and addresses the intersecting research and practice challenges of decolonisation, methodology, inequalities, and justice.

This former professor of Higher Education at the University of Nottingham currently holds the esteemed position of UFS Distinguished Professor. She has supervised the production of 23 doctoral theses on higher education and human development since 2016. Additionally, she has delivered numerous keynote speeches worldwide and is an acclaimed author of books and journal articles within her area of expertise.

 


 

PHOTO

Left: Prof Ivan Turok, from the South African National Research Foundation, who holds the Research Chair in Strengthening Urban Economies: People, Place, Production and Policy, is ranked 20th (2 825) in South Africa respectively.

Right: Prof Melanie Walker, SARChI Chair: Higher Education and Human Development, is ranked 41st (ranked 5 286 in the world) in the 2nd edition of Research.com ranking of the best scholars in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities.

 


 

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points
2004-07-29

   

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

 

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept