Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
02 June 2023 | Story Dr Yolandi Schoeman | Photo Supplied

In response to the recent cholera outbreaks in South Africa, the University of the Free State is at the forefront of developing a ground-breaking solution that aims to revolutionise low-cost domestic wastewater treatment and transform the country’s water infrastructure in rural areas. Led by the team at the UFS Centre for Environmental Management (CEM) in collaboration with the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), this innovative approach is centred around ecological engineering and offers a promising solution to the pressing water security concerns and increased pollution risks facing the nation.

South Africa has faced significant challenges in integrating water resource management and environmental preservation, leading to compromised water security and escalating pollution risks. Traditional wastewater treatment methods have struggled to cope with the deterioration of infrastructure, institutional capacity limitations, and rising hydraulic loads, resulting in the discharge of pollutants into rivers. This has raised concerns about the environmental and public health risks of heavy metals, emerging contaminants, and ‘forever chemicals’ (chemicals have an exceptionally long lifespan and do not naturally break down over time).

Natural-based solutions to address issues

Prof Paul Oberholster, Director of the CEM, says to address these critical issues, the centre has introduced a range of natural-based solutions, including phycoremediation, phytoremediation, and microbial bioremediation. Phycoremediation, a cutting-edge biological clean-up technology, uses indigenous micro or macro algae to remove contaminants from wastewater effluents.

“Phycoremediation effectively transforms pollutants such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfates, and salts into benign substances by harnessing nutrient enrichment. This process offers multiple advantages, including tackling various pollutants simultaneously, creating commercially beneficial compounds, sequestering CO2, and producing biohydrogen. Furthermore, phycoremediation is a cost-effective and resilient process that can accommodate varying substance quantities and consistencies.

“Microbial bioremediation, another pioneering technique, utilises microorganisms to naturally break down and degrade soil, water, and air pollutants. By leveraging the natural metabolic processes of microorganisms, microbial bioremediation reduces harmful substances to non-toxic or less toxic forms,” Prof Oberholster says. “This environmentally friendly method has shown success in cleaning up contaminated sites, including industrial areas, agricultural fields, disaster-stricken areas, and wastewater treatment plants.” 

This phycoremediation technology for domestic wastewater, developed in collaboration with the CSIR and the African Development Bank, is suitable for small to medium rural plants. It does not use electricity or any dangerous chemicals, and can be used on the assisting infrastructure. The technology has already been rolled out in the Western Cape, Limpopo, and Malawi.

According to Prof Oberholster, implementing these ecological engineering solutions provides transformative opportunities for small to medium-sized wastewater treatment works in South Africa. By incorporating these technologies, local communities can enhance treatment capacity, create employment opportunities, and recycle materials, while benefiting from cost-effective and environmentally conscious solutions. Upgrading existing treatment works becomes feasible, reducing the need for significant infrastructure investments.

Dr Yolandi Schoeman, a postdoctoral student in CEM, says cholera, a severe diarrheal disease caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, has been a significant concern in South Africa. Understanding the causes, warning signs, and preventive measures is crucial in combating this deadly disease. Cholera outbreaks often occur in areas with poor sanitation, inadequate access to clean water, and overcrowding. Contaminated water sources, such as rivers or wells, become breeding grounds for the bacterium, which is then transmitted through contaminated food and water. Early identification of warning signs, including severe diarrhoea, vomiting, and dehydration, is essential for timely intervention.

Causes of cholera

Contaminated water: Cholera outbreaks often occur in areas with poor sanitation and inadequate access to clean water. The bacterium Vibrio cholerae thrives in contaminated water sources such as rivers, lakes, or wells.

Contaminated food: Cholera can also be transmitted through consuming contaminated food, especially raw or undercooked seafood, or produce irrigated with contaminated water.

Poor sanitation: Improper waste disposal, lack of proper sewage systems, and unhygienic conditions contribute to the spread of cholera. When human waste containing the cholera bacterium contaminates water sources or food, the disease can spread rapidly.

Warning signs of cholera

Diarrhoea: Cholera is characterised by profuse watery diarrhoea. The stools are often described as "rice water" due to their appearance.

Vomiting: Along with diarrhoea, cholera may cause vomiting, leading to rapid dehydration.

Dehydration: Cholera can cause severe dehydration due to losing fluids and electrolytes. Signs of dehydration include dry mouth, excessive thirst, decreased urine output, rapid heart rate, and low blood pressure.

Preventive measures to combat cholera

Access to clean water: Ensuring a clean water supply is crucial in preventing cholera. Communities should have access to safe drinking water sources, and measures should be taken to prevent contamination of water sources.

Hygiene practices: Promoting good hygiene practices, such as regular handwashing with soap and clean water, can help prevent transmission of cholera. Handwashing should be done before handling food or eating, and after using the toilet.

Sanitation improvements: Proper waste disposal systems, improved sewage systems, and sanitation facilities are essential in preventing the contamination of water sources and the spread of cholera.

Health education: Conducting health education campaigns to raise awareness about cholera symptoms, transmission routes, and preventive measures is crucial. Communities at risk should be educated on safe water practices, proper hygiene, and the importance of seeking medical help if symptoms occur.

Surveillance and rapid response: Establishing robust surveillance systems to detect cholera cases early and respond rapidly is vital. This includes improving laboratory diagnostics, training healthcare workers, and enhancing communication between health authorities and communities.

Vaccination: Vaccination against cholera can be an effective preventive measure, especially in high-risk areas or during outbreaks. Oral cholera vaccines can provide protection against the disease. It is important to note that vaccines alone may not be sufficient to control cholera. Improving water and sanitation infrastructure, disaster anticipation and response, promoting good hygiene practices, and implementing appropriate public health measures are also crucial in preventing and controlling cholera outbreaks.

“To prevent cholera outbreaks, a multi-faceted approach is required,” Dr Schoeman says. “Individuals and communities must prioritise access to clean water by ensuring a clean water supply and promoting hygiene practices such as handwashing with soap. Sanitation improvements, including proper waste disposal and improved sewage systems, are essential in preventing the contamination of water sources.” 

She says health education campaigns should raise awareness about cholera symptoms, transmission routes, and preventive measures, targeting communities at risk. “Establishing robust surveillance systems and emergency response teams, improving laboratory diagnostics, and enhancing communication between health authorities and communities is crucial for rapid response to cholera cases.” 

In addition to these preventive measures, nature-based systems offer innovative approaches to cholera prevention by harnessing the power of natural ecosystems. Conserving and restoring wetlands, which act as natural filters, can help purify water and reduce the presence of pathogens like Vibrio cholerae. The integration of ecological engineering solutions, such as phycoremediation and microbial bioremediation, into wastewater treatment processes not only addresses pollution concerns but also contributes to preventing the contamination of water sources and reducing the risk of cholera outbreaks.

The CEM's pioneering work aligns seamlessly with South Africa's commitment to sustainable development and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 6, which aims to ensure universal access to clean water and sanitation. By integrating ecological engineering solutions like phycoremediation into public sector service delivery efforts, the CEM is driving positive change, improving quality of life for South African communities, and protecting precious water resources.

“The challenges we face in wastewater management, water security, and preventing cholera outbreaks require innovative solutions that prioritise ecological engineering and sustainability. Through our research and collaboration with local health authorities, we aim to develop preventive measures to combat cholera outbreaks and create a resilient water infrastructure for South Africa,” Prof Oberholster says.

The CEM's work has already demonstrated its efficacy and potential by piloting these advanced treatment technologies in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. “Further research and capacity-building efforts within South Africa will enable the widespread implementation of these solutions and address the unique challenges small and medium municipalities face,” Prof Oberholster adds. 

“The University of the Free State is committed to driving positive change, contributing to sustainable development, and ensuring universal access to clean water and sanitation in South Africa. By combining academic expertise, innovative technologies, and collaborative partnerships, the university aims to pave the way for a future where water resources are protected, cholera outbreaks are prevented, and communities thrive.”

News Archive

Bloemfontein's quality of tap water compares very favourably with bottled water
2009-08-04

The quality of the drinking water of five suburbs in Bloemfontein is at least as good as or better than bottled water. This is the result of a standard and chemical bacterial analysis done by the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Centre for Environmental Management in collaboration with the Institute for Groundwater Studies (IGS).

Five samples were taken from tap water sources in the suburbs of Universitas, Brandwag, Bain’s Vlei, Langenhoven Park and Bayswater and 15 samples were taken of different brands of still and unflavoured bottled water. The samples were analysed at the laboratory of the IGS, while the interpretation of the analysis was done by the Centre for Environmental Management.

“We wanted to evaluate the difference in quality for human consumption between tap water and that of the different brands of bottled water,” said Prof. Maitland Seaman, Head of the Centre for Environmental Management.

“With the exception of two samples produced by multinational companies at their plants in South Africa, the different brands of bottled water used for the study were produced by South African companies, including a local small-scale Bloemfontein producer,” said Prof. Seaman.

According to the labels, the sources of the water vary from pure spring water, to partial reverse osmosis (as an aid to standardise salt, i.e. mineral, content), to only reverse osmosis (to remove salts). (Reverse osmosis is a process in which water is forced under pressure through a pipe with minute pores through which water passes but no – or very low concentrations of – salts pass.)

According to Prof. Seaman, the analysis revealed some interesting findings, such as:

• It is generally accepted that drinking water should have an acceptable level of salt content, as the body needs salts. Most mineral contents were relatively higher in the tap water samples than the bottled water samples and were very much within the acceptable range of drinkable water quality. One of the bottled samples, however, had a very low mineral content, as the water was produced by reverse osmosis, as stated on the bottle. While reverse osmosis is used by various producers, most producers use it as an aid, not as a single method to remove nearly all the salts. Drinking only such water over a prolonged period may probably have a negative effect on the human physiology.

• The pH values of the tap water samples (8,12–8,40) were found to be slightly higher (slightly alkaline), like in all south-eastern Free State rivers (from where the water is sourced) than the pH of most of the bottled water samples, most of which are sourced and/or treated in other areas. Two brands of bottled water were found to have relatively low pH levels (both 4,5, i.e. acidic) as indicated on their bottles and as confirmed by the IGS analysis. The health implication of this range of pH is not significant.

• The analysis showed differences in the mineral content given on the labels of most of the water bottles compared to that found by IGS analysis. The possibility of seasonal fluctuation in content, depending on various factors, is expected and most of the bottling companies also indicate this on their labels. What was a rather interesting finding was that two pairs of bottled water brands claimed exactly the same mineral content but appeared under different brand names and were also priced differently. In each case, one of the pair was a well-known house brand, and the other obviously the original producer. In one of these paired cases, the house brand stated that the water was spring water, while the other (identical) “original” brand stated that it was spring water treated by reverse osmosis and oxygen-enriched.

• Nitrate (NO3) levels were uniformly low except in one bottled sample, suggesting a low (non-threatening) level of organic pollution in the source water. Otherwise, none of the water showed any sign of pollution.

• The bacterial analysis confirmed the absence of any traces of coliforms or E.coli in any of the samples, as was also indicated by the bottling companies. This is very reassuring. What is not known is how all these waters were sterilised, which could be anything from irradiation to chlorine or ozone treatment.

• The price of the different brands of bottled water, each containing 500 ml of still water, ranged between R3,99 and R8,99, with R5,03 being the average price. A comparison between the least expensive and the most expensive bottles of water indicated no significant difference in quality. In fact, discrepancies were observed in the most expensive bottle in that the amount of Calcium (Ca) claimed to be present in it was found to be significantly different from what the analysis indicated (29,6 mg/l versus 0,92 mg/l). The alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) indicated on the bottle was also found to differ considerably (83 mg/l versus 9,4 mg/l). The concentration of Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) was not given on the product.

“The preference for bottled water as compared to Bloemfontein’s tap water from a qualitative perspective as well as the price discrepancy is unjustifiable. The environmental footprint of bottled water is also large. Sourcing, treating, bottling, packaging and transporting, to mention but a few of the steps involved in the processing of bottled water, entail a huge carbon footprint, as well as a large water footprint, because it also requires water for treating and rinsing to process bottled water,” said Prof. Seaman.

Media Release
Lacea Loader
Deputy Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za  
3 August 2009

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept