Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
15 June 2023 | Story Vusumzi Qqalane | Photo Kaleidoscope
Vusumzi Gqalane
Vusumzi Gqalane is a Graduate Positioning Systems Success Coach at the Centre for Teaching and Learning, UFS.

Opinion Article by Vusumzi Qqalane, Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of the Free State.


South Africa commemorates the sacrifices made by the class of 1976 in their fight against the apartheid system. However, 47 years later, many young black people are still faced with challenges such as unemployment, poverty, gender-based violence (GBV), and an exclusionary, racist, and sexist higher education system. As a result, for the past 27 years since the attainment of democracy, black youth have been left behind by the ruling ANC party. The South African government has demonstrated a lack of adequate and impactful public policy implementation to address issues confronting young black people. Unemployment, GBV, poverty, and an unequal higher education system remain a ticking bomb for South Africa.

Unemployment crises amongst youth

After the release of the most recent data for the first quarter of 2023, according to Statistics SA, the youth unemployment rate has increased by 1.1% to 46.5% in the first quarter of 2023, indicating that 4.9 million young people in South Africa have little to no hope for the future. However, we are told every year that our government has dedicated itself to creating job opportunities for youth.

A new youth policy was introduced in 2015 by former president Jacob Zuma, who promised to prioritise youth development initiatives across all government departments. However, there needed to be more effect from the national youth policy. The year 2020 saw the launch of President Cyril Ramaphosa’s Youth Employment Services (YES) project, which had the ambitious target of reducing youth unemployment by one million through creating job opportunities, and not even half of that has been achieved. Instead, the public and private sectors still require three years of work experience, which prevents many young people from finding employment and subjects them to 12-month internships with no promise of permanent jobs.

This has resulted in a disgruntled, stressed-out, and hopeless young generation with a job today but nothing tomorrow. Young people live in an era where poverty and unemployment have been “normalised” in South Africa. Poignantly, youth dissatisfaction has been exacerbated by inadequate socioeconomic services and a lack of opportunities. Because of this, young people have become disenchanted with political processes and are further disengaged from electoral politics. As such, I argue that young people are slowly threatening South Africa’s democratic legitimacy and stability.

Gender-based violence & LGBTIQA+ community 

Gender-based violence is a pervasive issue in South Africa and has become our biggest nightmare, and we have one of the highest rates of domestic violence in the world; Statistics SA findings demonstrate that rape and sexual assault cases are a permanent trend in our communities. GBV has adversely impacted young women and non-binary minority groups in institutions of higher learning, and as a result, universities are no longer regarded as secure environments. Many South African universities were hit by protests in 2016 concerned about sexual assault on campuses, bringing to light how GBV is firmly established in institutions of higher learning. That is again proof that we are a generation fighting for survival, and unfortunately, GBV has become a norm in South Africa.

We also celebrate Pride Month in June to commemorate the 1969 Stonewall Riot and to honour the LGBTQI+ community. However, under the current status quo, students and youth who identify with the LGBTQI+ community continue to face harassment and discrimination as a result of their sexuality. This is driven by prejudice that is deeply rooted in nonsensical societal assumptions about gender roles, masculinity and femininity, particularly in South African universities. As stated before, we are a suffering and broken generation. Undeniably, people identifying with the LGBTQI+ community encounter various forms of discrimination daily in institutions of higher learning; this creates a persistent fear of “coming out” owing to systematic challenges. For example, the LGBTQI+ community faces challenges such as, but not limited to, the language used in university institutional policies and documents, infrastructure such as toilets, residential spaces that are not inclusive to the transgender community and LGBTQI+ community, labelling as isitabane, as a reference to homosexuals and homophobic behaviour on campus. The difficulties have a severe impact not only on academic performance but also on emotional health.

Universities should be at the forefront of fostering and advocating for inclusive and nonsexist environments within institutions, and in doing so, universities should be deliberate in making an impact in this regard. Siyanda Maganya from the Gender Equality and Anti-discrimination office in the Unit for institutional change and social justice in an opinion piece titled: ‘Gender-neutral language and titles can help create a more equitable playing field’ states that “the long-standing tradition of using terminologies that only recognise the gender binary ought to be denounced, as it is discriminatory and exclusionary towards students who do not identify as either male or female for participation in leadership roles”.

For the sake of this piece, I would use those words not only in the context of leadership roles but also in the language used to address students and employees in university policies, documents, and other forms of communication. In other words, institutions have a significant role in confronting the difficulties faced by the LGBQI+ community and young people in general. Furthermore, institutions are responsible for developing well-rounded graduates regarding societal challenges and educating communities about acts of marginalisation against the LGBTQI+ community.

Unequal higher education system

On December 16, 2017, former President Jacob Zuma publicly announced free higher education for poor and working-class students with a combined household income of R 350 000 per year. He also declared that NSFAS had been effectively changed to a 100% grant. This follows the student-led #FeesMustFall protest movement, which began mid-October 2015. Students nationwide began organising and taking to the streets to demand free decolonised higher education. This was the most excellent student-led demonstration since the historic 1976 Soweto uprising, despite the government’s ostensibly free education. Protests continue to erupt at campuses every year during the registration period. This is in response to financial and academic exclusions, inefficient NSFAS management, insufficient enrolment capacity, and exorbitant registration fees charged by institutions of higher learning.

Nothing for us without us - the power of young people

The existing South African political system is exclusionary to young people. For far too long, we have allowed the older generation to make decisions that directly affect us, despite the fact that they do not experience them. Young people have no voice or influence in government. To achieve inclusive political participation, as is our democratic prerogative, young people must first learn that “We are on our own”. We have accepted the unacceptable for so long because we have normalised the anomalous conditions.

It is now time to make a difference; young people have the potential to defend the ostensibly beneficial features of our South African democracy. In doing so, we must educate ourselves, empower ourselves, and fight for our liberation. As we approach the 2024 general elections, it is critical to remember you have a huge role to play in correcting the abnormal socioeconomic issues we are presently facing. Youth in South Africa have the numbers to effect change, and your vote is your voice. Change is at your disposal. 

Nina Simone and Weldon Irvin sang: “To be young, gifted, and black”. In its most basic version, the song was intended to honour black excellence and serve as a call to action for people to be proud of their heritage and fight against oppression (Bell, 2023). The relevance of this song is drawn from the third verse to meet the context and articulation of the perspective being discussed in this piece. “We must begin to tell our young, there’s a world waiting for you”. This statement highlights the significance of youth because the promise of tomorrow rests with them. Regardless of current socioeconomic imbalances, young people’s anguished cries will continue to haunt those with the power to change their current circumstances. Suffering from unemployment, poverty, GBV, and an unequal higher education system has been an unavoidable part of young people’s ordinary lives in South Africa. 

Thus, as we reflect on the victories of those who fought for us in 1976, young people must embrace resilience, pride, and an unwavering fight against the current status quo. However, young people must also accept responsibility, as we also perpetuate GBV and discrimination against those who identify with the LGBTQI+ community. As a result, before we go out, we must first fix our own house. We must call out each other, educate each other, and, most importantly, act and be proactive in changing our current conditions. 

  •  Vusumzi Gqalane is a Graduate Positioning Systems Success Coach at the Centre for Teaching and Learning, UFS. He is currently a Master’s degree candidate in Governance & Political Transformation and writes in his personal capacity. 

News Archive

Statement by Judge Faan Hancke, Chairperson of the Council of the University of the Free State (UFS)
2008-03-08

The Council of the University of the Free State today (Friday, 7 March 2008) unanimously condemned the offensive and racist Reitz video in the strongest possible terms.

Council further labeled the video as an insult to women, to older persons and to poor working people who are defenseless and vulnerable and expressed its disgust at the action of the students concerned.

Council also apologised unreservedly and sincerely to the five UFS employees who were shown in the video and offered all emotional and counselling assistance necessary as well as in the current criminal matter under way or possible civil action they may undertake.

At the same time the university must also provide counseling to current first year students of Reitz who were not present at the time of the filming of the video.

Council also mandated the management, in addition to the other disciplinary steps under way, to consider the possibility of closure and of conversion of Reitz into a beacon of transformation, hope and liberation (either as a residence or in some other form).

This must take place in accordance with due process of the law to give residents and other stakeholders reasonable opportunity to make submissions so that all relevant considerations can be taken into account.

The Council expressed its full confidence in the management and supported the steps taken by management thus far under trying circumstances concerning transformation, residence integration, the Reitz video and the vandalism of the campus.

It reaffirmed the decision taken in June 2007 to increase diversity in student residences and recommitted the UFS to implement the policy.

The Council condemns all forms of racism and committed itself to eradicate racism and racial prejudice in any form and from any quarter on the UFS campus.

The meeting also approved the appointment of an external expert agency to assist the university in:

  • understanding and identifying the current challenges relating to the implementation of the integration policy 
  • supporting the university management and making recommendations on how to enhance the process of implementation

The intention is to provide additional capacity to the management in order to accelerate the transformation and integration process.

It called on management to take firm action against any staff or student who violates the law, is involved in threats, racism, disruptions, intimidation and vandalism and condemned these actions in the strongest possible terms.

The Council reassured all staff, students, parents and other stakeholders that firm action will be taken against persons who are guilty of disorderly conduct, intimidation, disruption or similar actions with the full force of the law.

The management was requested to maintain law and order so as to create a conducive environment in which academic excellence can be furthered. The Council appreciates the steps that have been taken in this regard.

The Council supported a management initiative to investigate the fundamental issues underlying many of the current problems in residences, including:

  • residence culture, including initiation, as well as race, racialism and racism
  • alcohol and drug abuse role,
  • place, organisation and management of residences constitution of student structures
  • and the role of political parties in student politics and structures
  • the physical structure of residences as part of a campus accommodation strategy

The Council agreed that social cohesion and racial tolerance will be highlighted as a strong theme in the academic cluster initiatives of the UFS and that management should find additional ways to strengthen existing programmes regarding diversity on the campus among all staff and students.

The Council called on all stakeholders to honour the high values of the Constitution of the country, to maintain these values and to further them in an orderly and peaceful environment.

Media Release
Issued by: Anton Fisher
Director: Strategic Communication
Tel: 051 401 3422
Cell: 072 207 8334
E-mail: fishera.stg@ufs.ac.za
7 March 2008

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept