Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Africa Month: Uganda anti-gay law contradicts African Union goals

31 May 2023 | Story Valentino Ndaba | Photo Charl Devenish

UFS Federation of African Law Students Panel Discussion — The passing of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill in Uganda has raised concerns about human rights violations.

Uganda recently passed its Anti-Homosexuality Bill into law, sparking condemnation from the international community. This development coincides with the continent commemorating Africa Month as is customary in May.

The timing of Uganda’s signing of the anti-gay bill into law on the 60th anniversary of the African Union (AU) raises concerns about the contradiction between the AU's objective of promoting unity, nation-building, and freedom from discrimination and the enactment of legislation that violates these principles. It highlights the ongoing struggle to achieve equality and respect for the rights of all individuals, including those in the LGBTQ+ community, across the African continent.

Contravening intercontinental conventions

As a member of the AU, various international human rights treaties and instruments have been signed and approved by Uganda, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the African Charter on Human and People's Rights. These instruments promote equality, non-discrimination, and the protection of human rights for all individuals. The passing of such legislation contradicts the country's commitments to these international agreements.

LGBTQ+ intolerance is widespread in several other African nations. For instance, 32 of the 54 African nations forbid same-sex relationships. In fact, the death sentence is still applied to homosexuality in some nations. This includes Mauritania, Somalia, and a few Nigerian states that adhere to Sharia law. Homosexuality is a crime in Kenya, where the maximum sentence for incarceration is 14 years. It carries a minimum sentence of 13 years and a maximum of life imprisonment in Tanzania as well. Although there are anti-gay attitudes in many African nations, Uganda has gone too far by drafting legislation that is so reprehensible that it grossly violates human rights.

Providing an academic magnifying glass

On 24 May 2023, the University of the Free State (UFS) chapter of the Federation of African Law Students (FALAS), in collaboration with the Gender Equality and Anti-Discrimination Office, hosted a panel discussion on the Bloemfontein Campus, based on the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill.

Leading the panel discussion were UFS experts such as Prof John Mubangizi, who is the former Dean of the Faculty of Law and current Research Professor in the Free State Centre for Human Rights; Prof Mikateko Mathebula, Associate Professor in the Centre for Development Support; Khanya Motshabi, Senior Lecturer in Advanced Human Rights; as well as Akhona Komeni, Peer Mentor Supervisor at Free State Rainbow Seeds.

Factors contributing to anti-gay sentiments

Prof Mubangizi presented a summary of an article he recently submitted for publication in a scientific journal, titled: Uganda’s unrelenting opprobrious legislative efforts to criminalise same-sex relations: implications on human rights.

By way of introduction, Prof Mubangizi highlighted a few possible reasons for anti-gay sentiments in Uganda. “Firstly, many Ugandans are deeply religious and hold traditional beliefs that view homosexuality as immoral, unnatural, and contrary to the will of God – these beliefs are enforced by conservative interpretations of religious texts that condemn homosexuality. The second reason is political opportunism – some politicians in Uganda are using anti-gay sentiments to rally support and divert attention from other issues. Thirdly, there is a general lack of information about what homosexuality is.”

Human rights implications

FALAS Chairperson, Ntsako Khoza, said the organisation believes that the bill is a gross violation of human rights. “The student group opposes this legislation and is adamant that it unfairly discriminates against the LGBTQ+ population and is therefore backwards for society. Promoting good governance, respect for human rights, peace, and justice in Africa is the objective of our organisation,” he said.

It is important to note that the condemnation expressed by FALAS and the international community at large is based on the recognition that laws criminalising same-sex relationships are a violation of human rights and contribute to discrimination and persecution. Upholding human rights, promoting good governance, and fostering respect for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, is crucial for building inclusive and just societies.

News Archive

SA must appoint competent judges

2009-05-08

At the inaugural lecture are, from the left: Prof. Teuns Verschoor, Acting Rector of the UFS, Judge Farlam and Prof. Johan Henning, Dean of the Faculty of Law at the UFS.

Supreme Court of Appeal Judge Ian Farlam has called on the South African government to appoint and continue to appoint competent, fair and experienced judicial officers to sit in the country’s courts.

He also emphasised the need to have an efficient and highly respected appellate division, which rightly enjoys the confidence of all.

Judge Farlam was speaking at the University of the Free State (UFS) where he delivered his inaugural lecture as Extraordinary Professor in Roman Law, Legal History and Comparative Law in the Faculty of Law.

He said there were important lessons that emanated from the study of legal history in the Free State, particularly including the lesson that there were courageous jurists who spoke up for what they believed to be right, and a legislature who listened and did the right thing when required.

“This is part of our South African heritage which is largely forgotten – even by those whose predecessors were directly responsible for it. It is something which they and the rest of us can remember with pride,” Judge Farlam said.

Addressing the topic, Cox and Constitutionalism: Aspects of Free State Legal History, Judge Farlam used the murder trial of Charles Cox, who was accused of killing his wife and both daughters, to illustrate several key points of legal history.

Cox was eventually found guilty and executed, however, the trial caused a deep rift between the Afrikaans and English speaking communities in the Free State.

Judge Farlam also emphasised that the Free State Constitution embodied the principle of constitutionalism, with the result that the Free State was a state where the Constitution and not the legislature was sovereign. He said it was unfortunate that this valuable principle was eliminated in the Free State after the Boer War and said that it took 94 years before it was reinstated.

Judge Farlam added, “Who knows what suffering and tragedy might not have been avoided if, instead of the Westminster system, which was patently unsuited to South African conditions, we had gone into Union in 1910 with what one can describe as the better Trekker tradition, the tradition of constitutionalism that the wise burghers of the Free State chose in 1854 to take over into their Constitution from what we would call today the constitutional best practice of their time?”

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za
8 May 2009

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept