Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Africa Month: Uganda anti-gay law contradicts African Union goals

31 May 2023 | Story Valentino Ndaba | Photo Charl Devenish

UFS Federation of African Law Students Panel Discussion — The passing of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill in Uganda has raised concerns about human rights violations.

Uganda recently passed its Anti-Homosexuality Bill into law, sparking condemnation from the international community. This development coincides with the continent commemorating Africa Month as is customary in May.

The timing of Uganda’s signing of the anti-gay bill into law on the 60th anniversary of the African Union (AU) raises concerns about the contradiction between the AU's objective of promoting unity, nation-building, and freedom from discrimination and the enactment of legislation that violates these principles. It highlights the ongoing struggle to achieve equality and respect for the rights of all individuals, including those in the LGBTQ+ community, across the African continent.

Contravening intercontinental conventions

As a member of the AU, various international human rights treaties and instruments have been signed and approved by Uganda, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the African Charter on Human and People's Rights. These instruments promote equality, non-discrimination, and the protection of human rights for all individuals. The passing of such legislation contradicts the country's commitments to these international agreements.

LGBTQ+ intolerance is widespread in several other African nations. For instance, 32 of the 54 African nations forbid same-sex relationships. In fact, the death sentence is still applied to homosexuality in some nations. This includes Mauritania, Somalia, and a few Nigerian states that adhere to Sharia law. Homosexuality is a crime in Kenya, where the maximum sentence for incarceration is 14 years. It carries a minimum sentence of 13 years and a maximum of life imprisonment in Tanzania as well. Although there are anti-gay attitudes in many African nations, Uganda has gone too far by drafting legislation that is so reprehensible that it grossly violates human rights.

Providing an academic magnifying glass

On 24 May 2023, the University of the Free State (UFS) chapter of the Federation of African Law Students (FALAS), in collaboration with the Gender Equality and Anti-Discrimination Office, hosted a panel discussion on the Bloemfontein Campus, based on the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill.

Leading the panel discussion were UFS experts such as Prof John Mubangizi, who is the former Dean of the Faculty of Law and current Research Professor in the Free State Centre for Human Rights; Prof Mikateko Mathebula, Associate Professor in the Centre for Development Support; Khanya Motshabi, Senior Lecturer in Advanced Human Rights; as well as Akhona Komeni, Peer Mentor Supervisor at Free State Rainbow Seeds.

Factors contributing to anti-gay sentiments

Prof Mubangizi presented a summary of an article he recently submitted for publication in a scientific journal, titled: Uganda’s unrelenting opprobrious legislative efforts to criminalise same-sex relations: implications on human rights.

By way of introduction, Prof Mubangizi highlighted a few possible reasons for anti-gay sentiments in Uganda. “Firstly, many Ugandans are deeply religious and hold traditional beliefs that view homosexuality as immoral, unnatural, and contrary to the will of God – these beliefs are enforced by conservative interpretations of religious texts that condemn homosexuality. The second reason is political opportunism – some politicians in Uganda are using anti-gay sentiments to rally support and divert attention from other issues. Thirdly, there is a general lack of information about what homosexuality is.”

Human rights implications

FALAS Chairperson, Ntsako Khoza, said the organisation believes that the bill is a gross violation of human rights. “The student group opposes this legislation and is adamant that it unfairly discriminates against the LGBTQ+ population and is therefore backwards for society. Promoting good governance, respect for human rights, peace, and justice in Africa is the objective of our organisation,” he said.

It is important to note that the condemnation expressed by FALAS and the international community at large is based on the recognition that laws criminalising same-sex relationships are a violation of human rights and contribute to discrimination and persecution. Upholding human rights, promoting good governance, and fostering respect for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, is crucial for building inclusive and just societies.

News Archive

Twenty years of the constitution of South Africa – cause for celebration and reflection

2016-05-11

Description: Judge Azar Cachalia Tags: Judge Azar Cachalia

Judge Azar Cachalia

The University of the Free State’s Centre for Human Rights and the Faculty of Law held the celebration of the twentieth anniversary of the adoption of the South African Constitution on 11 May 2016 on the Bloemfontein Campus. Students and faculty members celebrated and reflected on not only the achievements of the constitution but also on perspectives regarding its relevance in modern society, and to what extent it has upheld the human rights of all citizens of South Africa.

The panel discussion started with a presentation on the pre-1996 perspective by Judge Azar Cachalia of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Judge Cachalia reflected on his role in the realisation and upholding of the constitution, from his days as a student activist, then as an attorney representing detainees during political turmoil, and currently as a judge: “My role as an attorney was to defend people arrested for public violence. My role as a judge today is to uphold the constitution.” He stressed the importance of the constitution today, and the responsibility institutions such as the police service have in upholding human rights. Judge Cachalia played a significant role in drafting the new Police Act around 1990, an Act which was to ensure that the offences perpetrated by the police during apartheid did not continue in the current democratic era. Further, he pointed out that societal turmoil has the potential to make society forget about the hard work that was put into structures upholding human rights. “Constitutions are drafted in moments of calm. It is a living document, and we hope it is not torn up when we go through social conflict, such as we are experiencing at present.”

Thobeka Dywili, a Law student at the UFS, presented her views from the new generation’s perspective. She relayed her experience as a student teaching human rights at schools in disadvantaged communities. She realised that, although the youth are quite aware of their basic human rights, after so many years of democracy, “women and children are still seen as previously disadvantaged when they should be equal”. She pointed out that, with the changing times, the constitution needs to be looked at with a new set of eyes, suggesting more robust youth engagement on topics that affect them, using technology to facilitate discussions. She said with the help of social media, it is possible for a simple discussion to become a revolution; #feesmustfall was a case in point.

Critical perspectives on the constitution were presented by Tsepo Madlingozi of University of Pretoria and University of London. In his view, the constitution has not affected policy to the extent that it should, with great disparities in our society and glaring issues, such as lack of housing for the majority of the poor. “Celebration of the constitution should be muted, as the constitution is based on a decolonisation approach, and does not directly address the needs of the poor. The Constitutional Court is not pro-poor.” He posed the question of whether twenty years on, the present government has crafted a new society successfully. “We have moved from apartheid to neo-apartheid, as black elites assimilate into the white world, and the two worlds that exist have not been able to stand together as a reflection of what the constitution stands for.”

Prof Caroline Nicholson, Dean of the Faculty of Law, encouraged more open discussions, saying such dialogues are exactly what was intended by the Centre for Human Rights. She emphasised the importance of exchanging ideas, of allowing people to speak freely, and of sharing perspectives on important issues such as the constitution and human rights.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept