Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
01 March 2024 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo SUPPLIED
Dr Lucas Erasmus
Dr Lucas Erasmus, Junior Researcher in the Department of Physics, has just returned from Belgium where he had his public defence of a joint PhD with Ghent University, titled: Luminescent solar concentrators – where Sm2+ doped phosphors shine.

“I like taking what I have learned from literature and going to the laboratory to test it. Sometimes the results surprise me, leading to additional experiments or refining. This process could continue for several months and even years, with me slowly building the puzzle. And finally, one day, all the pieces come together, and everything becomes very clear to me as a physicist. And if I am lucky, I will have the privilege of knowing a secret about nature that nobody else has known up to this point. However, as an innovator, I am tasked with using this new knowledge to develop ways to manipulate nature to deliver a helpful device.”

These are the thoughts of Dr Lucas Erasmus, Junior Researcher in the Department of Physics at the University of the Free State (UFS), who has just returned from Ghent, Belgium, where he had his public defence of a joint PhD with Ghent University, titled: Luminescent solar concentrators – where Sm2+ doped phosphors shine.

The research project is part of a bilateral collaboration between the Department of Physics at the UFS and the Department of Solid State Sciences at Ghent University. In this study, the strengths, experience, and resources of both research groups – experienced in developing luminescent materials for various applications – are used to ensure a stronger final product. To meet the requirements stipulated in the cooperation agreement between the two institutions for the joint supervision and certification of Dr Erasmus’ doctoral studies, research was conducted both at the UFS and at Ghent University.

Dr Erasmus’ research is significant in the light of rising energy prices, energy scarcity, and the pursuit of a carbon-free society, where there are strong incentives to develop new and renewable energy sources.

Combining windows and solar cells increase their relevancy in many applications

He says that although solar panels play an essential role in renewable energy – since they provide a route to directly convert solar radiation into electricity – there are limitations to installing conventional panels, which are bulky, rigid, and opaque. He believes that combining windows and solar cells could increase their relevance in the built environment, agricultural sector, and modern consumer electronics.

Explaining about the luminescent solar concentrator (LSC) in his study, he states that it is a device used as a large-area solar radiation collector that converts and emits radiation. The emitted radiation is directed to photovoltaic cells located in the small side area of the device. According to him, a basic LSC consists of a transparent waveguide with an embedded luminescent material and a strategically placed photovoltaic cell on the edge.

Dr Erasmus continues, “The large area of the waveguide collects a portion of the solar radiation, while the luminescent material absorbs the energy and downshifts it to longer wavelengths. Internal reflection directs the emitted photons towards smaller areas on the sides where the photovoltaic cells are used to convert the concentrated light into electricity.”

In his view, creating a large and efficient LSC is a challenging endeavour that requires an in-depth study of multiple domains. “This includes developing and optimising the luminescent material, studying its behaviour and the characteristics of the waveguide, and finally adding these two components and developing, characterising, and simulating the hybrid device,” he remarks.

“While the current prototype we have developed delivers good results, it is still far from perfect and not commercially viable,” he says, stating that this study could, however, serve as a guide for future researchers interested in developing LCSs. Dr Erasmus believes the underlying science behind the results contributes to a general understanding of the materials, making this study valuable to other fields and contributing to the larger body of science. At the end of the study, he also makes some recommendations for future research in this field. 

Study a reflection of theoretical knowledge and a practical system

The public defence consisted of both an internal and an external defence. The internal defence took place in January at the UFS between Dr Erasmus and the examination committee. The external defence occurred at Ghent University and was also open to the broader public. Also present at this event in Belgium were colleagues from the UFS – Prof David Motaung, an examiner; Prof Koos Terblans, co-supervisor; and Prof Hendrik Swart, supervisor for the PhD thesis.

Dr Erasmus’ experience of the oral examination was that the examiners were primarily positive in their critique but also thorough in their questioning. According to him, some of their remarks pointed out that they were impressed with the meticulous planning, execution, and interpretation of the experimental results and that the researchers involved ensured that any parameter that might have influenced the device was maximised. “Moreover, they liked the fact that I went all the way from theoretical knowledge to a practical system. The examiners also noted that the study compares well with the current state-of-the-art research in the field,” adds Dr Erasmus.

He says that having the public defence in Belgium was a once-in-a-lifetime experience, allowing him to interact and deliberate directly with the examiners and communicate their findings and conclusions to the broader public. Dr Erasmus hopes that this will lead to stronger collaboration and better public sentiment toward spending funding for scientific projects.

For future steps, he states, the research group involved in the project plans to continue this research by further increasing the device's efficiency. “To this end, we have already developed another luminescent material that can address some of the challenges we encountered while developing the first prototype device. This forms part of the work that Johané Odendaal is doing in her master’s degree, of which I am a co-supervisor. We also plan to enlarge the scope of our research to consider the challenges that are currently hampering the next generation of photovoltaic cells and to find ways in which we could address these issues,” comments Dr Erasmus.

News Archive

Questions about racial integration in residences answered
2007-07-31

Answers to frequently asked questions about the racial integration of student residences at the UFS

1. Why does the UFS want to change the current situation in the student residences?

There are many reasons why a new approach to placement in the student residences is necessary. However, the main reason is of an educational nature. As a university, the UFS should create an environment in its residences where students can learn to appreciate and respect the rich diversity that is on offer at the university. A university accommodates students from many different backgrounds in terms of race, language, religion, economic status, culture and other aspects. If a student can learn to appreciate the value in this rich diversity at university, he or she will also be able to appreciate the value of this diversity in the workplace and broader society.

The current situation of predominantly white and predominantly black residences has not been able to cultivate such an appreciation for diversity and respect for one another as human beings, and will not equip students with the knowledge and skills required to manage diversity.

Besides this, there are many other areas of life in the residences that need attention. For one, we need to urgently establish a human rights culture in the residences so that the rights of all students can be respected. We need to address the abuse of alcohol, provide disabled students with their rightful place, and last but not least, really entrench a culture of learning in student residences.

Let us make the residences places we can be proud of – places of learning, of diversity, of respect; places of growth and development. This is the ideal we should all strive to achieve.  

2. Why does the management want to force us to integrate?

It is a false argument to debate the issue in terms of “force”. Any decision by a University, or any other organisation, regarding matters of policy, rules and regulations implies a restriction on the choice of an individual and an obligation to comply.  What we should focus on is whether this decision of the Council is in the best interests of our students.

The management of the university believes that it has a responsibility to give students the best education possible, not only in terms of what you learn in the lecture rooms, but especially in the residences as well. The residences can be very powerful places of learning about matters of great importance, both academic and non-academic.

The parallel-medium language policy separates students into largely white/Afrikaans and black/English classes. Efforts are being made to bridge this divide in the classroom, but we can also try to eliminate it in the residences.

The university is committed to building a new culture for the entire institution that is based on values and principles – such as an academic culture, non-racialism, respect for human rights and diversity – among staff and students.

In the context of student residences, the application of these values and principles still allows substantial room for the voluntary exercising of choice by individuals as well as by Residence Committees, notably with regard to the placement of students (they can still place 50 percent of first-year students), as well as the determination of the future character and traditions of a diverse residence.

Furthermore, students can still choose their residences (subject to availability of places), can choose a roommate, and so forth.

3. What about freedom of association?

The rights we enjoy in a democracy must be balanced against other rights, as well as the laws of the country. This means that the right to freedom of association must be balanced against laws that make it illegal to discriminate against other people on the basis of race, language or religion, for instance.

Freedom of association pertains to the right of individuals to form voluntary organisations such as clubs or private boarding houses, or their right to join or not join existing organisations.  You exercise that right when you decide to become a student of the UFS, and again when you choose to live in one of its residences.

However, once you have decided to join an organisation voluntarily, you cannot subsequently demand that that organisation should provide a “club” or residence to your liking where, for instance, you only associate with your choice of co-members. You must accept the policies of that organisation.

In any case, how would that right of yours be balanced against the right of another individual who wishes to associate with a different set of co-members? (For instance – what about the freedom of a student to associate with students NOT from his own background, but indeed from another language, cultural, racial or economic background?) 

The constitutional right to freedom of association can, in any case, not be used to exclude or discriminate on the basis of race or religion (Section 18 of the Bill of Rights).

Besides, the new policy guidelines will still make provision for freedom of association. This right can be exercised freely within a diverse residence with regard to friendships, joint academic work, socialising, sport, etc.

4. Will residences not lose their traditions?

The University appreciates that there are many valuable elements of tradition in residences. However, we must bear in mind that the traditions and character of student residences have evolved and changed over time, and they will continue to evolve and to change. In addition, we do not need to accept all aspects of residence life purely on the basis of tradition, including the unacceptably high level of alcohol abuse and unsavoury, humiliating and discriminatory orientation practices. The new approach to integrated residences provides the opportunity to retain the positive aspects of the current traditions and character, but also to develop new traditions and give residences a new character.

We can now establish a tradition and a character for each residence that are reconcilable with the values of the University as a place of scholarship and are aligned with the human rights approach of our country’s Constitution, the laws of our country and the strengths and diversity of the students in a particular residence.

5. Have students been involved in this process? Is there a role for them to play after the decision has been taken by the Council of the UFS?

In the first semester of 2007, during two rounds of consultations, the primes, SRC and student organisations were consulted about the proposed new placement policy to increase diversity in residences. Some residences also made written submissions on the matter (such as Madelief, Soetdoring, Wag-'n-bietjie, Vergeet-my-nie, Emily Hobhouse). Other residences requested and were granted more time, but did not make any submissions in the end (such as Reitz and Armentum).

Management also had several meetings with the above-mentioned structures to hear first-hand from students their concerns and solutions regarding possible challenges presented by integration in residences.

During these interactions, several excellent ideas and proposals were put forward by students. These views had a definite impact on the eventual proposal that was taken to the University Council, in particular regarding the minimum level of diversity (30%) in junior residences and the fact that residences still want to have a say in the placement of students, rather than the placement decision being left in the hands of Management alone (hence the 50% placement portion of residences). Management values the effort that was put into the process by the primes and residence committees, and thanks them for their contributions.

However, it should be stressed that consultation should not be understood as a process of negotiation, nor does it imply that consensus must be reached. What it means is that Management must take a considered decision after hearing the views of stakeholders.

Management would like students to continue to provide input and ideas regarding the implementation details of the policy guidelines. Task teams have been established and students will be informed about how they can interact with the task teams on an ongoing basis.

6. But integration in the residences was tried in the past (in the late 1990s), and then it failed. Why will it work now?

Yes, the University of the Free State did integrate its residences as far back as 1993, and for a few years it worked. The UFS did it at that time and is now doing so again, because it is the right thing to do. Yet it is important to understand why the previous attempt at racial integration in residences was not successful.

Firstly, both black and white students were much polarised because of the apartheid past. Secondly, there was insufficient management support for students in the residences, the student leaders generally as well as residence heads, in terms of dealing with diversity and related issues. Thirdly, the institutional culture of the UFS and the residences in particular was not addressed as part of broader transformation and integration in residences, whereas it is now being addressed.

In addition, the current decision to integrate residences has the benefit of being implemented after several more years of integration in schooling, sport, workplaces and other aspects of life.

This decision is also based on Management’s commitment to give all the possible support it can to this process.

This is a very important initiative that the UFS is undertaking. Management, in co-operation with students, must ensure that it succeeds. Integrated residences that produce high-quality graduates equipped to deal with the challenges of the workplace and our society is a worthwhile ideal we should all strive to achieve.

If you would like to make a proposal regarding the implementation and practical aspects of the new policy, please send it to the following email address: rector@ufs.ac.za

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept