Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
29 November 2024 | Story Anthony Mthembu | Photo Tania Allan
Business School 25 Year Celebration
Some of the guests and staff members of the UFS Business School who attended the 25th anniversary celebration of the school.

To commemorate its 25th anniversary, the Business School at the University of the Free State (UFS) held a celebratory event on the UFS Bloemfontein Campus on 22 November 2024.

Prof Frans Prinsloo, acting Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences (EMS) at the UFS who attended the event, said, “The occasion is not just a celebration of the passing of time, but it’s also an opportunity for us to reflect on the values, achievements, and aspirations that have shaped the journey of the UFS Business School.” The event, which was regarded as a ‘momentous milestone’, was also attended by Prof Nicolene Barkhuizen, Director of the UFS Business School, Prof Frederick Fourie and Prof Bennie Anderson – founding members of the Business School, as well as Prof Tienie Crous and Prof Hendri Kroukamp, who are former deans of EMS.

A walk down memory lane

In his opening address, Prof Prinsloo reflected on the growth of the Business School over the past 25 years and highlighted some of the achievements of the staff that make up the Business School. However, the highlight of the event for many in the audience was the trip down memory lane by the founding members of the Business School as well as the former deans of the faculty.

 In their address, Profs Fourie and Anderson shared some of their fondest memories and experiences as they worked towards putting together the Business School. For instance, Prof Fourie indicated that in order to ensure that the syllabus was of high quality, the founding members had to travel overseas and learn from several institutions, such as Harvard Business School.

In addition, Profs Fourie and Anderson spoke extensively about their pride in the Business Management and Leadership (BML) programme, offered by the Business School. According to Prof Fourie, the degree was the brainchild of Prof Anderson, who for several reasons wanted to consider working adults who might not have had experience in school learning. As such, they consider the BML programme as one of their most special achievements, given its impact. Furthermore, Prof Crous and Prof Kroukamp also shared their memories of being part of the institution, and specifically the Business School.

Forging ahead for another 25 years

In the pursuit of 25 more years, Prof Barkhuizen indicated that the school is aiming to achieve success with several projects. These include staff and student exchanges in order to optimise the experience of both stakeholders. “Even though we have a global reach, it is important for us to apply it locally,” she said. In addition, Prof Barkhuizen highlights that for the Business School to continue serving the needs of its unique student clientele, it needs to become more agile. As such, it will continuously reinvent its programmes with the input of its stakeholders. For instance, she indicated that the school is looking at implementing joint qualification offerings, among other things.

As the event ended, Prof Barkhuizen said that she was, “so proud of the progress made by the Business School; it has been a journey to get here, but this function today taught me to never give up hope and not to give up on one’s dreams”.

News Archive

Reaction by the Rector of the UFS after a meeting with student leaders
2008-02-25

Reaction by the Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof. Frederick Fourie, on the agreement reached at a meeting with student leaders held on Friday, 22 February 2008

Note: This is meant to be used together with the full joint statement that was issued by the UFS management and student leaders on 22 February 2008.

The memorandum of the primes of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) residences was handed to top management on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. In the memorandum they asked for a meeting with the UFS management by Friday, 22 February 2008. Such a meeting was arranged and took place.

The UFS top management, all the residence primes as well as the house committee member for first years, the executive of the Main Campus Student Representative Council (SRC) and residence heads were present.

In contrast to what is suggested in the Volksblad report of Saturday, the discussion went off very well. There was no consternation or shouting or “emotions that ran high”. It was a civilised, decent meeting as it should be at a good university. Of course, now and again individuals spoke out strongly and very enthusiastically, but it was all decent and orderly. The contribution of the primes was insightful and well formulated.

Because the top management and I wanted to listen very carefully what the problems and frustrations were, we spent nearly five hours in the meeting. The issues in the memorandum were discussed one by one. In some cases I could take a decision immediately and finalise the matter, in other cases, the management provided information that could largely finalise a matter. A number of other matters must be investigated further.

The management undertook to respond comprehensively and in writing to all the issues raised in the memorandum by Monday, 25 February 2008. This will be handed to the primes but will not be handed to the media beforehand.
It is obvious that there are matters at the university that can be better managed and that there are problems with communication within the Student Affairs division. A major change such as the new policy on diversity places huge demands on management and the administration, and problems were to be expected. However, we understand the frustration of the students in residences.

On the other hand, students don’t always make matters easier. The strong opposition of white student leaders last year, and their unwillingness to co-operate in preparation for 2008 is well known. This year it is going better. But often student leaders take positions that are very inflexible. They also see no room for adapting old habits and simply want their own way. Their contributions are then full of statements such as “It cannot be done”. This delays measures such as the full implementation of expert interpreting services, which, for the management, is a very important measure (and which is functioning very well in certain residences). Communication from student leaders to management is also not always what it should be.

At the end of the meeting student leaders and management reached an important agreement and issued a joint statement in which they committed themselves to the integration process and to good co-operation and communication. This was an important step which is a sign of rebuilding trust. Naturally everyone will still have to work hard to build on this and to strengthen mutual trust.

The course and outcome of Friday’s discussions, as requested by the student leaders, show that issues can be addressed and resolved by means of us talking to one another. This is why it is so sad that primes and house committee members went on strike on Wednesday already and stayed in tents in front of the Main Building – leaving their residences without its leadership. This created an opening for what appears to have been well planned and co-ordinated acts of vandalism by inhabitants of residences on the campus on Wednesday.

Such vandalism is unacceptable and no one can justify it.

Fortunately, order could be restored quickly during the night and all academic activities could resume without any disruption on Thursday and Friday.

FCvN Fourie

Media Release
Issued by: Lacea Loader
Assistant Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za   
24 February 2008

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept