Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Drafting the South African constitution: an account by Justice Albie Sachs

06 November 2024 | Story Anthony Mthembu | Photo BORN2SHOOT

inaugural Albie Sachs Prestige Lecture 2024 — From the left (back row): Dean of the Faculty of Law, Prof Serges Kamga; Judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal, Justice Nolwazi Mabindla-Boqwana; Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation at the University of the Free State (UFS), Prof Vasu Reddy; Project Director of the Albie Collection and Chair of the Albie Sachs Trust (ASCAROL), Vanessa September; and acting Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Academic at the University of the Free State (UFS), Prof Philippe Burger. From the left (front row): Acting Vice-Chancellor of the University of the Free State (UFS), Prof Anthea Rhoda; Emeritus Constitutional Court Justice Albie Sachs; and Chief Justice of South Africa, Mandisa Maya.

The Faculty of Law at the University of the Free State (UFS) hosted the inaugural Albie Sachs Prestige Lecture on the UFS Bloemfontein Campus on 30 October 2024. The lecture – delivered by Emeritus Constitutional Court Justice Albie Sachs – was titled, ‘Who actually wrote the Constitution, and why they gave eleven unelected judges the power to strike down laws and actions of the democratically chosen parliament and president’?

In attendance at the lecture were Chief Justice of South Africa, Mandisa Maya; acting Vice-Chancellor of the UFS, Prof Anthea Rhoda; Judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal, Justice Nolwazi Mabindla-Boqwana; Senior State Advocate, Antoinette Ferreira; Project Director of the Albie Collection and Chair of the Albie Sachs Trust for Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law (ASCAROL), Vanessa September; as well as the Dean of the Faculty of Law, Prof Serges Kamga, among other high-profile guests.

In his opening address, Prof Kamga indicated that the lecture aimed to provide some responses to the core questions about the constitution and constitutionalism in South Africa. As such, Prof Rhoda echoed this sentiment, highlighting that, “when it comes to the events that preceded, surrounded, and followed the drafting and adoption of our country’s constitution, there are few commentators better placed than Judge Albie Sachs”.

The making of the constitution

As part of his lecture, Justice Sachs gave a detailed account of the making of the South African constitution. According to Justice Sachs, a total of 490 members of parliament came together to draft the constitution, which included members of the National Assembly and the Senate. These members had been mandated by 20 million South Africans who wanted a better future. As such, he described that moment as a “huge accomplishment on the part of the liberation movement”.

However, he highlighted that fulfilling this mandate was not an easy task, as it required an enormous amount of thought and mobilisation of legal technology to enable those in power at the time to surrender control of the army, police, and to some extent the economy and law-making, among other aspects. These negotiations resulted in a two-state process of constitution-making, which included the drafting of an interim constitution and the establishment of a parliament that would draft the final constitution.

Justice Sachs indicated that once the constitutional assembly sent the constitutional text to the constitutional court to ensure its compliance with agreed principles, it was found non-compliant in eleven respects, for which they had to find solutions in order for the constitution to be adopted.

As he concluded his address, Justice Sachs underscored his pride in having been involved in what he describes as a wonderfully rich story.

Forging a partnership

Subsequent to the address by Justice Sachs, the Faculty of Law and ASCAROL signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), formalising the Albie Sachs Prestige Lecture as an annual event and allowing further collaboration. In fact, Prof Kamga highlighted that if Justice Sachs was not available to deliver a lecture, the trust would appoint someone in his place. To further solidify this partnership, the faculty was gifted with some of Justice Sachs’ works, including books and other materials, for its library.

Prof Rhoda expressed gratitude for this collaborative effort, saying, “We are grateful to have found such a partner in Justice Albie Sachs and the Albie Sachs Trust. May this relationship continue to blossom and bear fruit – to the benefit of our young leaders of tomorrow.”

News Archive

Bullying in schools: Everyone’s problem

2005-06-03

From left: Prof Gerhardt de Klerk, Dean: Faculty of the Humanities; Prof Corene de Wet; Prof Rita Niemann, Head of the Department of Comparative Education and Educational Management in the School of Education and Prof Frederick Fourie, Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS

It is not only learners who are the victums of bullying in schools, but also the teachers. Prof. Corene de Wet from the Department Comparative Education and Educational Management at the University of the Free State reported, against the background of two studies on bullying in Free State secondary schools, that bullying is a general phenomena in these schools.

Prof. de Wet, who delivered her inaugural lecture on Wednesday night, is from the Department Comparative Education and Educational Management which resorts under the School of Education at the University of the Free State. She is the first women who became a full professor the School of Education.

Prof. de Wet says, “A student is being bullied or victimized when he or she is exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative action on the part of one or more students. Bullying always includes the intentional use of aggression, an unbalanced relationship of power between the bully and the victim, and the causing of physical pain and/or emotional misery.

In some Free State schools there are victims and perpetrators of direct and indirect verbal, as well as emotional, physical and sexual bullying.

“Adults who say that bullying are part of the growing-up process and parents who set not only academic expectations but also social expectations to their children cause that victims are unwilling to acknowledge that they are being bulled. Many parents are also unaware of the levels of bullying their children are exposed to.

“Some of the learners were at least once a month the victim of direct verbal harassment, 32,45% were assaulted by co-learners and 11,21% of them were at east once per week beat, kicked, pushed and hurt in any other physical way. Free State learners are very vulnerable to bullies at taxis and on the school yard they are mostly exposed to bullies in bathrooms.

“Learners are usually bullied by members of the same gender. However, racial composition also plays a role in some Free State schools. A grade 12 girl writes, ‘There are boys in my school who act means against black people. When the teacher is out they take a red pen and write on the projector and spray it with spirits. It looks like blood and they would say it is AIDS and my friends and I have it.’

“Educators must take note of bullying in schools and must not shrug it off as unimportant. Principals or educators could be find guilty of negligence. A large number of educator respondents, 88,29%, indicated that they would intervene in cases of verbal bullying and 89,71% would intervene if they saw learners being physically bullied. However, only 19,97% of the learners who were victims of bullying were helped by educators/ other adults from their respective schools.

“The learners’ lack of trust in their educators’ abilities and willingness to assist them in the fight against bullying has important implications for education institutions. The importance of training must be emphasised.

Learners bully their educators to undermine their confidence. In Prof. de Wet’s study on educator-targeted bullying in Free State schools 24,85% of the respondents were physically abused by their learners, 33,44% were the victims of indirect verbal bullying, and 18,1% were at one time or another sexually harassed by their learners. These learner offences may lead to suspension.

“Educators are not only victims of bullying; some of them are the bullies. The South African Council for Educators prohibits bullying by educators. It is worrying that 55,83% of the educators who participated in the research project verbally victimised learners, 50,31% physically assaulted learners and a small percentage was guilty of sexual harassment.

“Every educator and learner in South Africa has the right to life, equal protection and benefit of the law, of dignity, as well as of freedom and security of the person. These rights will only be realised in a bully-free school milieu.

“To oppose bullying a comprehensive anti-bullying programme, collective responsibility and the establishment of a caring culture at schools and in the community is necessary,” said Prof. de Wet.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept