Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

UFS celebrates and honours its exceptional academic achievers

23 October 2024 | Story André Damons | Photo CTL

Dr Arno van Niekerk — Dr Arno Van Niekerk, Senior Lecturer in the Department Economics and Finance was awarded the UFS 2023 Book Prize award at the UFS Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards.

The University of the Free State (UFS) celebrated its researchers, academics and academic support staff at the inaugural UFS Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards with Prof Hendrik Swart, Dr Arno van Niekerk and Jana Lamprecht walking away with the Prestige Academic Achievers Awards.

Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards bring together the annual Learning and Teaching Awards (hosted by CTL), as well as the Research Awards hosted in 2023 by the office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation. This award function aims to recognise exceptional academic achievements in the area of learning and teaching, as well as research – breaking down silos within the academic space.

Prof Swart, Senior Professor in the Department of Physics and the SARChI Research Chair: Solid-state Luminescent and Advanced Materials, won the Exceptional Established Achievers’ Award which comes with R30 000 in prize money. Dr Van Niekerk, Senior Lecturer in the Department Economics and Finance was awarded the UFS 2023 Book Prize award for his book The Inclusive Economy: Criteria, Principles and Ubuntu, winning R25 000, while Lamprecht, Senior Lecturer in the School of Accountancy, walked away with the Vice-Chancellor’s Awards in Learning and Teaching.

In her welcoming address, Prof Anthea Rhoda, Acting Vice-Chancellor and Principal of the UFS, said the purpose of the ceremony is to recognise those scholars at the UFS who are doing outstanding work in research and in teaching and learning in their respective disciplines. She said what is especially exciting about awards is the recognition of both research and teaching excellence as these two pillars of academia are often viewed separately but at the UFS it is understood that they are deeply interconnected.

“Each one of the nominees and winners is making a significant impact in their fields of research and in teaching and learning at the UFS and in doing so, are raising the excellence profile of the UFS and driving our aspirations to be a student-centred, research-led university, as outlined in Vision 130,” Prof Rhoda said.

Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, said: “Quality research is another building block in a university.” He emphasised that the recognition of research excellence is about “asking key questions as to what makes the research by our colleagues unique, what makes it novel, how does it build on past and current knowledge, but perhaps more important, how does it shift the knowledge base to move us to innovation and impact?”

Freedom to be creative and innovative

Lamprecht, who received a special recognition for being a National University Teaching Awards (NUTA) nominee, says she feels absolute gratitude for winning this award. “I am grateful that the University of the Free State not only allows me the academic freedom to be creative and innovative in my teaching but that the university also recognises and rewards excellence.”

Last year she won the Innovation in Learning and Teaching Best Conference paper as well as the Innovating my Curriculum through Student Engagement and/or Motivation awards at the UFS Learning and Teaching awards. In 2020, Lamprecht also walked away with awards at the UFS Learning and Teaching awards as well as a Senior Top Achiever: Teaching and Learning Award from the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences.

According to her, she had to submit a teaching portfolio and was invited to present at the Learning and Teaching conference. However, she did not expect to win the category as the other three colleagues who were also nominated in this category were strong contenders.

“It always feels good when efforts are recognised and rewarded. However, for me, this award is about having a platform to share innovative teaching and learning ideas with fellow lecturers, empowering colleagues to have a positive impact on the academic careers of our students,” says Lamprecht.

Recognition is motivation

Dr Van Niekerk had previously received the Junior Lecturer of the Year award from his faculty (EMS), as well as the Service-Learning award for the engaged scholarship work he does with his students.

According to him, he did not expect to win and was surprised when his name was called as the winner. Says Dr van Niekerk: “I was hoping but I didn’t want to raise my expectations too high. I mean, the UFS has excellent academics in various faculties, so I honestly didn’t expect anything.

“I was so surprised, to be honest. I also felt a deep sense of appreciation for recognising the hard work one puts in in writing a book like that. The many hours of waking up at 3am to do the research for the book now really feels worth it.”

Dr Van Niekerk says recognition has a special effect on you and motivates you in a surprising way. Academics, he says, do not do research and teaching for the awards, so when they come by, it gives you a warm feeling.

“Lecturers really put in a lot of effort, which isn’t often seen or recognised because we have to balance so many responsibilities – and the expectations keep rising. I have to admit, we do feel under constant pressure, which I don’t think is ideal. I decided to write the book out of passion to contribute towards real economic change. Now that it’s recognised, it confirms to me once again that people flourish when they live out their passion, not when they’re under pressure.”

According to Prof Swart, it is always a great honour to be recognised for the work he has done in the past.

“I knew I had been nominated, but I was not expecting to win. This award is only possible if you have a large team of collaborators all over the world, staff, postgraduate and postdoctoral students that work together, producing world-class research. Although I received the award, I accept it on the team's behalf and thank them for their support over the years,” says Prof Swart.

Research and teaching and learning valued, supported, and celebrated

Prof Rhoda commended the award-winning researchers and said their perseverance, curiosity, and hard work have led to remarkable contributions. She said they remind us that academic excellence is not just about individual success but about shaping the world for the better.

According to her, research is the bedrock of innovation. It is through research that we challenge boundaries, explore new frontiers, and contribute to the advancement of our society.

“At the UFS, we pride ourselves on fostering an environment where research can thrive – where questions can be asked, hypotheses tested, and knowledge advanced. Tonight, we honour those who have not only asked the important questions but have provided answers that make an impact.

“Our researchers are producing ground-breaking work that addresses some of the most pressing challenges facing our world today – whether in health, science, commerce, the humanities, education, or technology. Your work enriches the intellectual fabric of this institution, and it positions us as a global player in the academic community.”

But research, Prof Rhoda continued, is only one side of the coin. Teaching and learning are equally critical to the mission of this university. It is through innovative and impactful teaching and learning that we prepare the next generation of leaders, innovators, and critical citizens, she said.

“Great teaching inspires; it transforms lives and lays the foundation for future achievements. Tonight, we recognise the outstanding educators who have gone above and beyond in their commitment to teaching and learning. You are the mentors, the guides, and the role models who make a lasting impact on the lives of your students.

“Through your creativity, dedication, and compassion, you help students not only acquire knowledge but also develop the critical thinking and problem-solving skills they need to navigate an ever-changing world. To our award-winning educators, we thank you for your service to the university and to your students.”

Prof Reddy concluded by emphasised a theme of the event stating that “research and teaching are inextricably intertwined and interrelated. Purposeful teaching efforts and investments in good teaching can make us better researchers. The flipside is also true.” He added: “Research results inspire and instil fresh insights into the lecture theatres and laboratories, both scientific and creative.”

Click to view document Click here to view a complete list of UFS Learning and Teaching Conference winners, and click here to watch the highlight video.

Interested in finding out who the nominees were? Click here to view the booklet.

News Archive

Bloemfontein's quality of tap water compares very favourably with bottled water

2009-08-04

The quality of the drinking water of five suburbs in Bloemfontein is at least as good as or better than bottled water. This is the result of a standard and chemical bacterial analysis done by the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Centre for Environmental Management in collaboration with the Institute for Groundwater Studies (IGS).

Five samples were taken from tap water sources in the suburbs of Universitas, Brandwag, Bain’s Vlei, Langenhoven Park and Bayswater and 15 samples were taken of different brands of still and unflavoured bottled water. The samples were analysed at the laboratory of the IGS, while the interpretation of the analysis was done by the Centre for Environmental Management.

“We wanted to evaluate the difference in quality for human consumption between tap water and that of the different brands of bottled water,” said Prof. Maitland Seaman, Head of the Centre for Environmental Management.

“With the exception of two samples produced by multinational companies at their plants in South Africa, the different brands of bottled water used for the study were produced by South African companies, including a local small-scale Bloemfontein producer,” said Prof. Seaman.

According to the labels, the sources of the water vary from pure spring water, to partial reverse osmosis (as an aid to standardise salt, i.e. mineral, content), to only reverse osmosis (to remove salts). (Reverse osmosis is a process in which water is forced under pressure through a pipe with minute pores through which water passes but no – or very low concentrations of – salts pass.)

According to Prof. Seaman, the analysis revealed some interesting findings, such as:

• It is generally accepted that drinking water should have an acceptable level of salt content, as the body needs salts. Most mineral contents were relatively higher in the tap water samples than the bottled water samples and were very much within the acceptable range of drinkable water quality. One of the bottled samples, however, had a very low mineral content, as the water was produced by reverse osmosis, as stated on the bottle. While reverse osmosis is used by various producers, most producers use it as an aid, not as a single method to remove nearly all the salts. Drinking only such water over a prolonged period may probably have a negative effect on the human physiology.

• The pH values of the tap water samples (8,12–8,40) were found to be slightly higher (slightly alkaline), like in all south-eastern Free State rivers (from where the water is sourced) than the pH of most of the bottled water samples, most of which are sourced and/or treated in other areas. Two brands of bottled water were found to have relatively low pH levels (both 4,5, i.e. acidic) as indicated on their bottles and as confirmed by the IGS analysis. The health implication of this range of pH is not significant.

• The analysis showed differences in the mineral content given on the labels of most of the water bottles compared to that found by IGS analysis. The possibility of seasonal fluctuation in content, depending on various factors, is expected and most of the bottling companies also indicate this on their labels. What was a rather interesting finding was that two pairs of bottled water brands claimed exactly the same mineral content but appeared under different brand names and were also priced differently. In each case, one of the pair was a well-known house brand, and the other obviously the original producer. In one of these paired cases, the house brand stated that the water was spring water, while the other (identical) “original” brand stated that it was spring water treated by reverse osmosis and oxygen-enriched.

• Nitrate (NO3) levels were uniformly low except in one bottled sample, suggesting a low (non-threatening) level of organic pollution in the source water. Otherwise, none of the water showed any sign of pollution.

• The bacterial analysis confirmed the absence of any traces of coliforms or E.coli in any of the samples, as was also indicated by the bottling companies. This is very reassuring. What is not known is how all these waters were sterilised, which could be anything from irradiation to chlorine or ozone treatment.

• The price of the different brands of bottled water, each containing 500 ml of still water, ranged between R3,99 and R8,99, with R5,03 being the average price. A comparison between the least expensive and the most expensive bottles of water indicated no significant difference in quality. In fact, discrepancies were observed in the most expensive bottle in that the amount of Calcium (Ca) claimed to be present in it was found to be significantly different from what the analysis indicated (29,6 mg/l versus 0,92 mg/l). The alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) indicated on the bottle was also found to differ considerably (83 mg/l versus 9,4 mg/l). The concentration of Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) was not given on the product.

“The preference for bottled water as compared to Bloemfontein’s tap water from a qualitative perspective as well as the price discrepancy is unjustifiable. The environmental footprint of bottled water is also large. Sourcing, treating, bottling, packaging and transporting, to mention but a few of the steps involved in the processing of bottled water, entail a huge carbon footprint, as well as a large water footprint, because it also requires water for treating and rinsing to process bottled water,” said Prof. Seaman.

Media Release
Lacea Loader
Deputy Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za
3 August 2009

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept