Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
23 October 2024 | Story André Damons | Photo CTL
Dr Arno van Niekerk
Dr Arno Van Niekerk, Senior Lecturer in the Department Economics and Finance was awarded the UFS 2023 Book Prize award at the UFS Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards.

The University of the Free State (UFS) celebrated its researchers, academics and academic support staff at the inaugural UFS Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards with Prof Hendrik Swart, Dr Arno van Niekerk and Jana Lamprecht walking away with the Prestige Academic Achievers Awards.

Exceptional Academic Achievers Awards bring together the annual Learning and Teaching Awards (hosted by CTL), as well as the Research Awards hosted in 2023 by the office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation. This award function aims to recognise exceptional academic achievements in the area of learning and teaching, as well as research – breaking down silos within the academic space.

Prof Swart, Senior Professor in the Department of Physics and the SARChI Research Chair: Solid-state Luminescent and Advanced Materials, won the Exceptional Established Achievers’ Award which comes with R30 000 in prize money. Dr Van Niekerk, Senior Lecturer in the Department Economics and Finance was awarded the UFS 2023 Book Prize award for his book The Inclusive Economy: Criteria, Principles and Ubuntu, winning R25 000, while Lamprecht, Senior Lecturer in the School of Accountancy, walked away with the Vice-Chancellor’s Awards in Learning and Teaching.

In her welcoming address, Prof Anthea Rhoda, Acting Vice-Chancellor and Principal of the UFS, said the purpose of the ceremony is to recognise those scholars at the UFS who are doing outstanding work in research and in teaching and learning in their respective disciplines. She said what is especially exciting about awards is the recognition of both research and teaching excellence as these two pillars of academia are often viewed separately but at the UFS it is understood that they are deeply interconnected.

“Each one of the nominees and winners is making a significant impact in their fields of research and in teaching and learning at the UFS and in doing so, are raising the excellence profile of the UFS and driving our aspirations to be a student-centred, research-led university, as outlined in Vision 130,” Prof Rhoda said.

Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, said: “Quality research is another building block in a university.” He emphasised that the recognition of research excellence is about “asking key questions as to what makes the research by our colleagues unique, what makes it novel, how does it build on past and current knowledge, but perhaps more important, how does it shift the knowledge base to move us to innovation and impact?”

Freedom to be creative and innovative

Lamprecht, who received a special recognition for being a National University Teaching Awards (NUTA) nominee, says she feels absolute gratitude for winning this award. “I am grateful that the University of the Free State not only allows me the academic freedom to be creative and innovative in my teaching but that the university also recognises and rewards excellence.”

Last year she won the Innovation in Learning and Teaching Best Conference paper as well as the Innovating my Curriculum through Student Engagement and/or Motivation awards at the UFS Learning and Teaching awards. In 2020, Lamprecht also walked away with awards at the UFS Learning and Teaching awards as well as a Senior Top Achiever: Teaching and Learning Award from the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences.

According to her, she had to submit a teaching portfolio and was invited to present at the Learning and Teaching conference. However, she did not expect to win the category as the other three colleagues who were also nominated in this category were strong contenders.

“It always feels good when efforts are recognised and rewarded. However, for me, this award is about having a platform to share innovative teaching and learning ideas with fellow lecturers, empowering colleagues to have a positive impact on the academic careers of our students,” says Lamprecht.

Recognition is motivation

Dr Van Niekerk had previously received the Junior Lecturer of the Year award from his faculty (EMS), as well as the Service-Learning award for the engaged scholarship work he does with his students.

According to him, he did not expect to win and was surprised when his name was called as the winner. Says Dr van Niekerk: “I was hoping but I didn’t want to raise my expectations too high. I mean, the UFS has excellent academics in various faculties, so I honestly didn’t expect anything.

“I was so surprised, to be honest. I also felt a deep sense of appreciation for recognising the hard work one puts in in writing a book like that. The many hours of waking up at 3am to do the research for the book now really feels worth it.”

Dr Van Niekerk says recognition has a special effect on you and motivates you in a surprising way. Academics, he says, do not do research and teaching for the awards, so when they come by, it gives you a warm feeling.

“Lecturers really put in a lot of effort, which isn’t often seen or recognised because we have to balance so many responsibilities – and the expectations keep rising. I have to admit, we do feel under constant pressure, which I don’t think is ideal. I decided to write the book out of passion to contribute towards real economic change. Now that it’s recognised, it confirms to me once again that people flourish when they live out their passion, not when they’re under pressure.”

According to Prof Swart, it is always a great honour to be recognised for the work he has done in the past.

“I knew I had been nominated, but I was not expecting to win. This award is only possible if you have a large team of collaborators all over the world, staff, postgraduate and postdoctoral students that work together, producing world-class research. Although I received the award, I accept it on the team's behalf and thank them for their support over the years,” says Prof Swart.

Research and teaching and learning valued, supported, and celebrated

Prof Rhoda commended the award-winning researchers and said their perseverance, curiosity, and hard work have led to remarkable contributions. She said they remind us that academic excellence is not just about individual success but about shaping the world for the better.

According to her, research is the bedrock of innovation. It is through research that we challenge boundaries, explore new frontiers, and contribute to the advancement of our society.

“At the UFS, we pride ourselves on fostering an environment where research can thrive – where questions can be asked, hypotheses tested, and knowledge advanced. Tonight, we honour those who have not only asked the important questions but have provided answers that make an impact.

“Our researchers are producing ground-breaking work that addresses some of the most pressing challenges facing our world today – whether in health, science, commerce, the humanities, education, or technology. Your work enriches the intellectual fabric of this institution, and it positions us as a global player in the academic community.”

But research, Prof Rhoda continued, is only one side of the coin. Teaching and learning are equally critical to the mission of this university. It is through innovative and impactful teaching and learning that we prepare the next generation of leaders, innovators, and critical citizens, she said.

“Great teaching inspires; it transforms lives and lays the foundation for future achievements. Tonight, we recognise the outstanding educators who have gone above and beyond in their commitment to teaching and learning. You are the mentors, the guides, and the role models who make a lasting impact on the lives of your students.

“Through your creativity, dedication, and compassion, you help students not only acquire knowledge but also develop the critical thinking and problem-solving skills they need to navigate an ever-changing world. To our award-winning educators, we thank you for your service to the university and to your students.”

Prof Reddy concluded by emphasised a theme of the event stating that “research and teaching are inextricably intertwined and interrelated. Purposeful teaching efforts and investments in good teaching can make us better researchers. The flipside is also true.” He added: “Research results inspire and instil fresh insights into the lecture theatres and laboratories, both scientific and creative.”

Click to view documentClick here to view a complete list of UFS Learning and Teaching Conference winners, and click here to watch the highlight video.

Grey document Interested in finding out who the nominees were? Click here to view the booklet.

News Archive

Weideman focuses on misconceptions with regard to survival of Afrikaans
2006-05-19

From the left are Prof Magda Fourie (Vice-Rector: Academic Planning), Prof Gerhardt de Klerk (Dean: Faculty of the Humanities), George Weideman and Prof Bernard  Odendaal (acting head of the UFS  Department of Afrikaans and Dutch, German and French). 
Photo (Stephen Collett):

Weideman focuses on misconceptions with regard to survival of Afrikaans

On the survival of a language a persistent and widespread misconception exists that a “language will survive as long as people speak the language”. This argument ignores the higher functions of a language and leaves no room for the personal and historic meaning of a language, said the writer George Weideman.

He delivered the D.F. Malherbe Memorial Lecture organised by the Department Afrikaans at the University of the Free State (UFS). Dr. Weideman is a retired lecturer and now full-time writer. In his lecture on the writer’s role and responsibility with regard to language, he also focused on the language debate at the University of Stellenbosch (US).

He said the “as-long-as-it-is spoken” misconception ignores the characteristics and growth of literature and other cultural phenomena. Constitutional protection is also not a guarantee. It will not stop a language of being reduced to a colloquial language in which the non-standard form will be elevated to the norm. A language only grows when it standard form is enriched by non-standard forms; not when its standard form withers. The growth or deterioration of a language is seen in the growth or decline in its use in higher functions. The less functions a language has, the smaller its chance to survive.

He said Afrikaans speaking people are credulous and have misplaced trust. It shows in their uncritical attitude with regard to the shifts in university policies, university management and teaching practices. Afrikaners have this credulity perhaps because they were spoilt by white supremacy, or because the political liberation process did not free them from a naïve and slavish trust in government.

If we accept that a university is a kind of barometer for the position of a language, then the institutionalised second placing of Afrikaans at most tertiary institutions is not a good sign for the language, he said.

An additional problem is the multiplying effect with, for instance, education students. If there is no need for Afrikaans in schools, there will also be no  need for Afrikaans at universities, and visa versa.

The tolerance factor of Afrikaans speaking people is for some reasons remarkably high with regard to other languages – and more specifically English. With many Afrikaans speaking people in the post-apartheid era it can be ascribed to their guilt about Afrikaans. With some coloured and mostly black Afrikaans speaking people it can be ascribed to the continued rejection of Afrikaans because of its negative connotation with apartheid – even when Afrikaans is the home language of a large segment of the previously oppressed population.

He said no one disputes the fact that universities play a changing role in a transformed society. The principle of “friendliness” towards other languages does not apply the other way round. It is general knowledge that Afrikaans is, besides isiZulu and isiXhosa, the language most spoken by South Africans.

It is typical of an imperialistic approach that the campaigners for a language will be accused of emotional involvement, of sentimentality, of longing for bygone days, of an unwillingness to focus on the future, he said.

He said whoever ignores the emotional aspect of a language, knows nothing about a language. To ignore the emotional connection with a language, leads to another misconception: That the world will be a better place without conflict if the so-called “small languages” disappear because “nationalism” and “language nationalism” often move closely together. This is one of the main reasons why Afrikaans speaking people are still very passive with regard to the Anglicising process: They are not “immune” to the broad influence that promotes English.

It is left to those who use Afrikaans to fight for the language. This must not take place in isolation. Writers and publishers must find more ways to promote Afrikaans.

Some universities took the road to Anglicision: the US and University of Pretoria need to be referred to, while there is still a future for Afrikaans at the Northwest University and the UFS with its parallel-medium policies. Continued debate is necessary.

It is unpreventable that the protest over what is happening to Afrikaans and the broad Afrikaans speaking community must take on a stronger form, he said.

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept