Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Prof Jeremy Smith at his inaugural lecture: ‘Being Finished is Finished’

04 September 2024 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Stephen Collett

A few days after the annual Sophia Gray lecture, the Department of Architecture at the University of the Free State (UFS) hosted the inaugural lecture of Prof Jeremy Smith.

Prof Smith, the Design Director of Irving Smith Architects in New Zealand and an Adjunct Professor in the UFS Department of Architecture, is known for his innovative approach to architecture that emphasises sustainability and the relationship between buildings and their natural surroundings.

Earlier this year, he partnered with RTA Studio – an architectural firm based in Auckland, New Zealand – and won the prestigious Dubai International Best Practices Award for Sustainable Development in the category of the Most Beautiful, Innovative and Iconic Building with the entry: The ‘Scion Innovation Hub, Te Whare Nui O Tuteata.

A changing climate

Themed Being Finished is Finished, the lecture attracted a diverse audience of architects, industry stakeholders, academics, students, and the general public. Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, welcomed Prof Smith and the attendees. He congratulated Prof Smith on this milestone, highlighting that a professor’s work often represents the beginning of much unfinished business. He noted that the UFS is proud to host such lectures, which celebrate and acknowledge excellence in research and practice.

Prof Paul Oberholster, Dean of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, introduced Prof Smith, praising his impressive career and the numerous national and international awards he has received.

Prof Smith’s lecture focused on the evolving relationship between architecture and the landscape, particularly in New Zealand, where only a quarter of the original forests remain. “We know our climate is changing. In New Zealand we massively made landscape; landscape is everything. Modernism has asked us to use the lawnmower,” he remarked.

He believes in the importance of architecture that adapts and evolves within its natural surroundings, rather than imposing new landscapes. He introduced the concept of ‘soft architecture’, which involves designing buildings that fit into the changing landscape. This approach allows for a sustainable relationship between architecture and nature, ensuring that buildings enhance rather than dominate their environment.

He illustrated this philosophy with a project, the ‘Bach with Two Roofs’ house, which was damaged by a cyclone in 2014. The storm altered the surrounding landscape, and rather than simply repairing the house, Prof Smith redesigned it in a flexible and adaptive manner that might accommodate environmental change. This project demonstrated how buildings can be refurnished to adapt to a shift in the landscape, ultimately coexisting with and responding to the natural world.

“From life in the forest, the landscape shifted – the sun was hotter, the wind was stronger. Our building has lost its fit to the landscape. Refurnishing it, we need to acknowledge that this time a new forest will grow. It will be a stronger forest – it will be indigenous and will grow in relation to the building. In this shifting landscape, it’s not the landscape that needs to be refurnished. It is the building.”

Doing more with less

Prof Smith also discussed two award-winning projects: the ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project and the ‘Feather House’. Both projects are examples of his commitment to sustainability and adaptive design – doing more with less.

The ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project, part of the New Zealand government’s SCION Timber Research Institute, uses a diagrid timber structure that reduces material usage and allows the building to integrate seamlessly with its forest surroundings. The building was designed with a neutral carbon count, and the timber used was locally sourced, reflecting the natural landscape.

Prof Smith described the building as an educational invitation to visitors to ‘walk in our forest’ and learn new and sustainable ways of resourcing and building with timber. “The building behaves like a forest – the closer you get the more is revealed. Light filtering through its timber framework is also much like sunlight through a forest canopy – enhancing the building’s connection to its surroundings.”

In discussing the Feather House, Prof Smith highlighted the importance of designing spaces that can evolve with their inhabitants. “Design for the ‘there and then’ rather than for the ‘here and now’,” he said. “One cannot design a room for every occasion, but you can provide an invitation.” He advocates for creating architecture that anticipates future changes and adapts to evolving environments, ensuring that buildings remain relevant and functional over time. His design philosophy underscores connection rather than division of spaces and doing less rather than more to create adaptable and sustainable living environments. “Do not design the space based on whose shoes are in the shoe rack,” he commented.

News Archive

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during Reconciliation Lecture

2014-03-05

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during the Third Annual Reconciliation Lecture entitled Forgiveness, Law and Justice.
Photo: Johan Roux

No one could have anticipated the atmosphere in which Prof Martha Minow would visit the Bloemfontein Campus. And no one could have predicted how apt the timing of her message would be. As this formidable Dean of Harvard University’s Law School stepped behind the podium, a latent tension edged through the crowded audience.

“The issue of getting along after conflict is urgent.”

With these few words, Prof Minow exposed the essence of not only her lecture, but also the central concern of the entire university community.

As an expert on issues surrounding racial justice, Prof Minow has worked across the globe in post-conflict societies. How can we prevent atrocities from happening? she asked. Her answer was an honest, “I don’t know.” What she is certain of, on the other hand, is that the usual practice of either silence or retribution does not work. “I think that silence produces rage – understandably – and retribution produces the cycle of violence. Rather than ignoring what happens, rather than retribution, it would be good to reach for something more.” This is where reconciliation comes in.

Prof Minow put forward the idea that forgiveness should accompany reconciliation efforts. She defined forgiveness as a conscious, deliberate decision to forego rightful grounds of resentment towards those who have committed a wrong. “To forgive then, in this definition, is not an obligation. It’s a choice. And it’s held by the one who was harmed,” she explained.

Letting go of resentment cannot be forced – not even by the law. What the law can do, though, is either to encourage or discourage forgiveness. Prof Minow showed how the law can construct adversarial processes that render forgiveness less likely, when indeed its intention was the opposite. “Or, law can give people chances to meet together in spaces where they may apologise and they may forgive,” she continued. This point introduced some surprising revelations about our Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

Indeed, studies do report ambivalence, disappointment and mixed views about the TRC. Whatever our views are on its success, Prof Minow reported that people across the world wonder how South African did it. “It may not work entirely inside the country; outside the country it’s had a huge effect. It’s a touchstone for transitional justice.”

The TRC “seems to have coincided with, and maybe contributed to, the relatively peaceful political transition to democracy that is, frankly, an absolute miracle.” What came as a surprise to many is this: the fact that the TRC has affected transitional justice efforts in forty jurisdictions, including Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Liberia. It has even inspired the creation of a TRC in Greensborough, North Carolina, in the United States.

There are no blueprints for solving conflict, though. “But the possibility of something other than criminal trials, something other than war, something other than silence – that’s why the TRC, I think, has been such an exemplar to the world,” she commended.

Court decision cannot rebuild a society, though. Only individuals can forgive. Only individuals can start with purposeful, daily decisions to forgive and forge a common future. Forgiveness is rather like kindness, she suggested. It’s a resource without limits. It’s not scarce like water or money. It’s within our reach. But if it’s forced, it’s not forgiveness.

“It is good,” Prof Minow warned, “to be cautious about the use of law to deliberately shape or manipulate the feelings of any individual. But it is no less important to admit that law does affect human beings, not just in its results, but in its process.” And then we must take responsibility for how we use that law.

“A government can judge, but only people can forgive.” As Prof Minow’s words lingered, the air suddenly seemed a bit more buoyant.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept