Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Prof Jeremy Smith at his inaugural lecture: ‘Being Finished is Finished’

04 September 2024 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Stephen Collett

A few days after the annual Sophia Gray lecture, the Department of Architecture at the University of the Free State (UFS) hosted the inaugural lecture of Prof Jeremy Smith.

Prof Smith, the Design Director of Irving Smith Architects in New Zealand and an Adjunct Professor in the UFS Department of Architecture, is known for his innovative approach to architecture that emphasises sustainability and the relationship between buildings and their natural surroundings.

Earlier this year, he partnered with RTA Studio – an architectural firm based in Auckland, New Zealand – and won the prestigious Dubai International Best Practices Award for Sustainable Development in the category of the Most Beautiful, Innovative and Iconic Building with the entry: The ‘Scion Innovation Hub, Te Whare Nui O Tuteata.

A changing climate

Themed Being Finished is Finished, the lecture attracted a diverse audience of architects, industry stakeholders, academics, students, and the general public. Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, welcomed Prof Smith and the attendees. He congratulated Prof Smith on this milestone, highlighting that a professor’s work often represents the beginning of much unfinished business. He noted that the UFS is proud to host such lectures, which celebrate and acknowledge excellence in research and practice.

Prof Paul Oberholster, Dean of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, introduced Prof Smith, praising his impressive career and the numerous national and international awards he has received.

Prof Smith’s lecture focused on the evolving relationship between architecture and the landscape, particularly in New Zealand, where only a quarter of the original forests remain. “We know our climate is changing. In New Zealand we massively made landscape; landscape is everything. Modernism has asked us to use the lawnmower,” he remarked.

He believes in the importance of architecture that adapts and evolves within its natural surroundings, rather than imposing new landscapes. He introduced the concept of ‘soft architecture’, which involves designing buildings that fit into the changing landscape. This approach allows for a sustainable relationship between architecture and nature, ensuring that buildings enhance rather than dominate their environment.

He illustrated this philosophy with a project, the ‘Bach with Two Roofs’ house, which was damaged by a cyclone in 2014. The storm altered the surrounding landscape, and rather than simply repairing the house, Prof Smith redesigned it in a flexible and adaptive manner that might accommodate environmental change. This project demonstrated how buildings can be refurnished to adapt to a shift in the landscape, ultimately coexisting with and responding to the natural world.

“From life in the forest, the landscape shifted – the sun was hotter, the wind was stronger. Our building has lost its fit to the landscape. Refurnishing it, we need to acknowledge that this time a new forest will grow. It will be a stronger forest – it will be indigenous and will grow in relation to the building. In this shifting landscape, it’s not the landscape that needs to be refurnished. It is the building.”

Doing more with less

Prof Smith also discussed two award-winning projects: the ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project and the ‘Feather House’. Both projects are examples of his commitment to sustainability and adaptive design – doing more with less.

The ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project, part of the New Zealand government’s SCION Timber Research Institute, uses a diagrid timber structure that reduces material usage and allows the building to integrate seamlessly with its forest surroundings. The building was designed with a neutral carbon count, and the timber used was locally sourced, reflecting the natural landscape.

Prof Smith described the building as an educational invitation to visitors to ‘walk in our forest’ and learn new and sustainable ways of resourcing and building with timber. “The building behaves like a forest – the closer you get the more is revealed. Light filtering through its timber framework is also much like sunlight through a forest canopy – enhancing the building’s connection to its surroundings.”

In discussing the Feather House, Prof Smith highlighted the importance of designing spaces that can evolve with their inhabitants. “Design for the ‘there and then’ rather than for the ‘here and now’,” he said. “One cannot design a room for every occasion, but you can provide an invitation.” He advocates for creating architecture that anticipates future changes and adapts to evolving environments, ensuring that buildings remain relevant and functional over time. His design philosophy underscores connection rather than division of spaces and doing less rather than more to create adaptable and sustainable living environments. “Do not design the space based on whose shoes are in the shoe rack,” he commented.

News Archive

Letter to students from Prof Jonathan Jansen about student protest action at the UFS

2015-10-21

Dear Students

Student protest action at the University of the Free State

I wish to make clear that the senior leadership of the University of the Free State understands and supports the demands from students and their leaders that higher education be accessible to all students, especially the poor. For the past six years we have done everything in our power to meet that commitment to students who are academically talented, but simply cannot afford to pay; that is why our tuition fees remain among the lowest in the country. Our efforts to raise private funding have enabled thousands more students to study at the UFS than would have been possible on the government subsidy only. Whether it is the Staff Fund contributions (yes, our staff empty their pockets to support student fees) or the No Student Hungry (NSH) bursary programme (yes, we raise funds for food bursaries), we will continue our drive to fund students who cannot afford higher education. Let me repeat, no student with a solid academic record will be denied access to studies simply because they cannot pay.

Now, to the matter at hand. There is a national demand from students for a 0% fee increment for 2016. The Minister’s response, after consultation with stakeholders, was that universities should cap their 2016 fee increases at 6%. Despite this initiative from government, the protests continue on virtually all campuses across South Africa for the ‘no fee’ increase.

Our response, as the UFS leadership, is to continue engaging the SRC as the chosen leadership of our students in trying to negotiate a settlement on the matter. We have worked around the clock to be available to student leaders to find some resolution on 2016 fees. While we understand the demands of students, as university leaders, we can only work with the government subsidy we receive. Any agreement reached, cannot and must not place the university at academic and financial risk in its ability to deliver public higher education to the country - if that happens, everybody loses. Still, no matter what happens in terms of the response from government, the leadership door at the UFS remains open to finding a mutually acceptable solution to all parties in these deliberations.

Students, we are deeply concerned by the violence, intimidation and threats from the small group of protesting students. These dangerous and demeaning behaviours, like disrupting classes and verbally abusing students and staff, undermine the legitimate quest of students for relief concerning tuition fees. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable and the university will take action where required. We must also remember that we have an obligation to all 30 000 students whose right to learn without fear of violence and intimidation must be respected.

In conclusion, over the past few years we have worked hard to build a culture of mutual respect and embrace as we worked through some very difficult challenges on campus. You would have noticed that the university leadership responded quickly and sympathetically to reason and respect in difficult situations of rage and demonstration. A minority of students, with some outsiders, have come onto the campus to break down that culture in which, while we might disagree, we continue to work on the basis of mutual respect. I urge all students that, as we engage of this important problem of enabling greater access to higher education, we continue to remain true to the core values of our Human Project.

Best Regards

Prof Jonathan Jansen
Vice-Chancellor and Rector
University of the Free State

Letter to students from Prof Jonathan Jansen about student protest actions at the UFS (Pdf format)

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept