Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Prof Jeremy Smith at his inaugural lecture: ‘Being Finished is Finished’

04 September 2024 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Stephen Collett

A few days after the annual Sophia Gray lecture, the Department of Architecture at the University of the Free State (UFS) hosted the inaugural lecture of Prof Jeremy Smith.

Prof Smith, the Design Director of Irving Smith Architects in New Zealand and an Adjunct Professor in the UFS Department of Architecture, is known for his innovative approach to architecture that emphasises sustainability and the relationship between buildings and their natural surroundings.

Earlier this year, he partnered with RTA Studio – an architectural firm based in Auckland, New Zealand – and won the prestigious Dubai International Best Practices Award for Sustainable Development in the category of the Most Beautiful, Innovative and Iconic Building with the entry: The ‘Scion Innovation Hub, Te Whare Nui O Tuteata.

A changing climate

Themed Being Finished is Finished, the lecture attracted a diverse audience of architects, industry stakeholders, academics, students, and the general public. Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, welcomed Prof Smith and the attendees. He congratulated Prof Smith on this milestone, highlighting that a professor’s work often represents the beginning of much unfinished business. He noted that the UFS is proud to host such lectures, which celebrate and acknowledge excellence in research and practice.

Prof Paul Oberholster, Dean of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, introduced Prof Smith, praising his impressive career and the numerous national and international awards he has received.

Prof Smith’s lecture focused on the evolving relationship between architecture and the landscape, particularly in New Zealand, where only a quarter of the original forests remain. “We know our climate is changing. In New Zealand we massively made landscape; landscape is everything. Modernism has asked us to use the lawnmower,” he remarked.

He believes in the importance of architecture that adapts and evolves within its natural surroundings, rather than imposing new landscapes. He introduced the concept of ‘soft architecture’, which involves designing buildings that fit into the changing landscape. This approach allows for a sustainable relationship between architecture and nature, ensuring that buildings enhance rather than dominate their environment.

He illustrated this philosophy with a project, the ‘Bach with Two Roofs’ house, which was damaged by a cyclone in 2014. The storm altered the surrounding landscape, and rather than simply repairing the house, Prof Smith redesigned it in a flexible and adaptive manner that might accommodate environmental change. This project demonstrated how buildings can be refurnished to adapt to a shift in the landscape, ultimately coexisting with and responding to the natural world.

“From life in the forest, the landscape shifted – the sun was hotter, the wind was stronger. Our building has lost its fit to the landscape. Refurnishing it, we need to acknowledge that this time a new forest will grow. It will be a stronger forest – it will be indigenous and will grow in relation to the building. In this shifting landscape, it’s not the landscape that needs to be refurnished. It is the building.”

Doing more with less

Prof Smith also discussed two award-winning projects: the ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project and the ‘Feather House’. Both projects are examples of his commitment to sustainability and adaptive design – doing more with less.

The ‘Te Whare Nui O Tuteata’ project, part of the New Zealand government’s SCION Timber Research Institute, uses a diagrid timber structure that reduces material usage and allows the building to integrate seamlessly with its forest surroundings. The building was designed with a neutral carbon count, and the timber used was locally sourced, reflecting the natural landscape.

Prof Smith described the building as an educational invitation to visitors to ‘walk in our forest’ and learn new and sustainable ways of resourcing and building with timber. “The building behaves like a forest – the closer you get the more is revealed. Light filtering through its timber framework is also much like sunlight through a forest canopy – enhancing the building’s connection to its surroundings.”

In discussing the Feather House, Prof Smith highlighted the importance of designing spaces that can evolve with their inhabitants. “Design for the ‘there and then’ rather than for the ‘here and now’,” he said. “One cannot design a room for every occasion, but you can provide an invitation.” He advocates for creating architecture that anticipates future changes and adapts to evolving environments, ensuring that buildings remain relevant and functional over time. His design philosophy underscores connection rather than division of spaces and doing less rather than more to create adaptable and sustainable living environments. “Do not design the space based on whose shoes are in the shoe rack,” he commented.

News Archive

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy

2007-08-06

In her inaugural lecture Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Sciences, focused on the impact that Pan-Africanist sentiments have had on South Africa’s foreign policy. She also put the resulting contradictions and ambiguities into context. At her inaugural lecture were, from the left: Proff. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS), Heidi Hudson, Engela Pretorius (Vice-Dean: Faculty of The Humanities) and Daan Wessels (Research Associate in the Department of Political Science).
Photo: Stephen Collett

Academic delivers inaugural lecture on South African foreign policy

“We are committed to full participation as an equal partner … opposed to any efforts which might seek to project South Africa as some kind of superpower on our continent. … the people of Africa share a common destiny and must therefore … address their challenges … as a united force...” (Mbeki 1998:198-199).

Prof. Heidi Hudson from the Department of Political Science referred to this statement made by president Mbeki (made at the opening of the OAU Conference of Ministers of Information in 1995) when she delivered her inaugural lecture on the topic: South African foreign policy: The politics of Pan-Africanism and pragmatism.

One of the questions she asked is: “Can the South African state deliver democracy and welfare at home while simultaneously creating a stable, rules-based African community?”

She answers: “South Africa needs to reflect more critically and honestly on the dualism inherent in its ideological assumptions regarding relations with Africa. South Africa will always be expected by some to play a leadership role in Africa. At the moment, South Africa’s desire to be liked is hampering its role as leader of the continent.”

In her lecture she highlighted the ideological underpinnings and manifestations of South Africa’s foreign policy. Throughout she alluded to the risks associated with single-mindedly following an ideologically driven foreign policy. She emphasised that domestic or national interests are the victims in this process.

Prof. Hudson offers three broad options for South Africa to consider:

The Predator – the selfish bully promoting South African economic interest.
Mr Nice Guy – the non-hegemonic partner of the African boys club, multilaterally pursuing a pivotal but not dominant role.
The Hegemon - South Africa driving regional integration according to its values and favouring some African countries over others, and with checks and balances by civil society.

She chooses option three of hegemony. “Politically correct research views hegemony as bad and partnership as good. This is a romanticised notion – the two are not mutually exclusive,” she said.

However, she states that there have to be prerequisites to control the exercise of power. “The promotion of a counter-hegemon, such as Nigeria, is necessary. Nigeria has been more effective in some respects than South Africa in establishing its leadership, particularly in West Africa. Also needed is that government should be checked by civil society to avoid it sinking into authoritarianism. The case of business and labour coming to an agreement over the HIV/Aids issue is a positive example which illustrates that government cannot ignore civil society. But much more needs to be done in this regard. South Africa must also be very careful in how it uses its aid and should focus potential aid and development projects more explicitly in terms of promoting political stability,” she said.

Prof. Hudson said: “It is also questionable whether Mbeki’s Afro-centrism has in fact promoted the interests of ordinary citizens across Africa. Instead, elite interests in some countries have benefited. But ultimately, the single most important cost is the damage done to the moral code and ethical principles on which the South African Constitution and democracy is founded.

“In the end we all lose out. More pragmatism and less ideology in our relations within Africa may just be what are needed,” she said.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept