Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

UFS Architecture students shine in Italian Design Day competition

11 April 2025 | Story Martinette Brits | Photo Supplied

Italian Design Day Competition Winners — National student competition winners, UFS's Gustav Pretorius and Jeanré Erasmus, pictured with Matteo Cibic and Michele Gialdroni, Director of the Italian Cultural Institute.

Two talented Architecture students from the University of the Free State (UFS), Jeanré Erasmus and Gustav Pretorius, have achieved national acclaim by winning the prestigious Italian Design Day 2025 Competition held in Pretoria. Their innovative exhibition space, inspired by The Dancer - a dynamic ceramic sculpture by renowned South African artist Andile Dyalvane – captivated the judging panel and emerged victorious from among 45 entries submitted by 140 students from across South Africa.

Passion meets purpose

For Erasmus, now in his third year of Architecture and working part-time at Soleil Architects, the path to this milestone began at an early age. “Ever since I was little, I’ve been obsessed with building things,” he recalls. His fascination with design and problem-solving naturally evolved into a passion for architecture, and he credits the UFS for providing a nurturing environment where both his technical skills and creative thinking could flourish.

He credits his lecturers and peers for constantly challenging his ideas and pushing him towards excellence. He highlights the impact of former lecturer Martie Bitzer in shaping his journey. “We have an amazing, talented, and kind lecturer in Martie Bitzer, who has a big heart for architecture and her students,” he says.

Pretorius, a fourth-year student, shares a similar drive. His design philosophy is deeply rooted in human experience and storytelling – an approach that played a key role in their winning design. “For me, architecture is not only about the physical form – it is about how people interact with and move through space,” he explains. He believes their studies at UFS prepared them well to take on real-world challenges, equipping them with both conceptual depth and technical precision.

Designing the story

The Italian Design Day 2025 Competition, held on 24 February 2025 in Pretoria, tasked students with designing an exhibition space that captured the whimsical and narrative-rich aesthetic of renowned Italian designer Matteo Cibic. Instead of simply showcasing objects, the brief called for storytelling through design.

Erasmus and Pretorius rose to the challenge by creating a space that echoed the movement and transformation embodied in Dyalvane’s The Dancer. “We didn’t want to use the static display cases,” explained Erasmus. “We designed the space that guided visitors through an interactive journey, rooted in the idea of shaping and refining - mirroring the movement and storytelling embedded in Dyalvane’s clay sculpture.”

Their concept impressed a panel of esteemed judges that included architects, Fanele Zondi and Braam de Villiers, and Stefania Iuliano, Commercial Attaché at the Italian Embassy in Pretoria. The panel’s combined expertise ensured a thorough evaluation of creativity, innovation, and spatial storytelling.

Overcoming creative challenges

Developing a design that balanced imaginative expression with practical execution was no easy task. “Picture two architecture students staring at a blank page late at night, questioning their life choices,” Erasmus jokes. One of the greatest challenges was translating a deeply emotional concept into a physical space - but through teamwork and continuous refinement, they achieved a balance between form and function.

“Like any great duo – Batman and Robin, peanut butter and jelly, architecture and last-minute deadlines – we balanced each other out,” Erasmus adds. Pretorius agrees, noting that their shared technical mindset kept the design process grounded in feasibility while still allowing room for creativity. Their ability to combine conceptual innovation with structural logic ultimately set their entry apart.

A milestone moment

When Erasmus received the call announcing their win, the moment was surreal. “It was a mix of shock and excitement, with a little bit of ‘Wait, is this a prank?’” he says. Although initially sworn to secrecy, the pair struggled to contain their excitement. “We didn’t exactly stick to that rule,” Erasmus admits with a laugh.

Beyond the accolade, this experience has been transformative. “This experience has been like a masterclass in storytelling through space,” says Pretorius. “It reminded us that architecture is not just about buildings – it is about making people feel something.”

Looking ahead, both students are eager to continue exploring the narrative potential of architecture. Erasmus is particularly interested in how design intersects with various forms of artistic expression, while Pretorius plans to focus on sustainable and experiential design. They agree that the competition has reinforced their belief in architecture as a powerful tool for storytelling and human connection.

The winning exhibition space:

News Archive

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during Reconciliation Lecture

2014-03-05

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during the Third Annual Reconciliation Lecture entitled Forgiveness, Law and Justice.
Photo: Johan Roux

No one could have anticipated the atmosphere in which Prof Martha Minow would visit the Bloemfontein Campus. And no one could have predicted how apt the timing of her message would be. As this formidable Dean of Harvard University’s Law School stepped behind the podium, a latent tension edged through the crowded audience.

“The issue of getting along after conflict is urgent.”

With these few words, Prof Minow exposed the essence of not only her lecture, but also the central concern of the entire university community.

As an expert on issues surrounding racial justice, Prof Minow has worked across the globe in post-conflict societies. How can we prevent atrocities from happening? she asked. Her answer was an honest, “I don’t know.” What she is certain of, on the other hand, is that the usual practice of either silence or retribution does not work. “I think that silence produces rage – understandably – and retribution produces the cycle of violence. Rather than ignoring what happens, rather than retribution, it would be good to reach for something more.” This is where reconciliation comes in.

Prof Minow put forward the idea that forgiveness should accompany reconciliation efforts. She defined forgiveness as a conscious, deliberate decision to forego rightful grounds of resentment towards those who have committed a wrong. “To forgive then, in this definition, is not an obligation. It’s a choice. And it’s held by the one who was harmed,” she explained.

Letting go of resentment cannot be forced – not even by the law. What the law can do, though, is either to encourage or discourage forgiveness. Prof Minow showed how the law can construct adversarial processes that render forgiveness less likely, when indeed its intention was the opposite. “Or, law can give people chances to meet together in spaces where they may apologise and they may forgive,” she continued. This point introduced some surprising revelations about our Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

Indeed, studies do report ambivalence, disappointment and mixed views about the TRC. Whatever our views are on its success, Prof Minow reported that people across the world wonder how South African did it. “It may not work entirely inside the country; outside the country it’s had a huge effect. It’s a touchstone for transitional justice.”

The TRC “seems to have coincided with, and maybe contributed to, the relatively peaceful political transition to democracy that is, frankly, an absolute miracle.” What came as a surprise to many is this: the fact that the TRC has affected transitional justice efforts in forty jurisdictions, including Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Liberia. It has even inspired the creation of a TRC in Greensborough, North Carolina, in the United States.

There are no blueprints for solving conflict, though. “But the possibility of something other than criminal trials, something other than war, something other than silence – that’s why the TRC, I think, has been such an exemplar to the world,” she commended.

Court decision cannot rebuild a society, though. Only individuals can forgive. Only individuals can start with purposeful, daily decisions to forgive and forge a common future. Forgiveness is rather like kindness, she suggested. It’s a resource without limits. It’s not scarce like water or money. It’s within our reach. But if it’s forced, it’s not forgiveness.

“It is good,” Prof Minow warned, “to be cautious about the use of law to deliberately shape or manipulate the feelings of any individual. But it is no less important to admit that law does affect human beings, not just in its results, but in its process.” And then we must take responsibility for how we use that law.

“A government can judge, but only people can forgive.” As Prof Minow’s words lingered, the air suddenly seemed a bit more buoyant.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept