Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
15 August 2025 | Story Tshepo Tsotetsi
Business Acumen Day
The UFS School of Accountancy recently hosted its third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion, featuring former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, Prof Deon Rossouw, Rochelle Murugan, and Prof Bernard Agulhas.

The University of the Free State’s (UFS) School of Accountancy in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences hosted its third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion on 12 August 2025, placing ethics, integrity, and public trust firmly under the spotlight.

Sponsored by audit, accounting and consulting firm Forvis Mazars South Africa, the day opened with a student-centred engagement in the Callie Human Centre, followed by a dynamic panel discussion with staff and stakeholders at the Centenary Complex. Both sessions tackled the theme ‘Restoring Public Trust: Ethical Leadership in an Era of Public Accountability’.

The panel featured former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, whose decades in judicial service include leading the State Capture Commission; Prof Deon Rossouw, an internationally recognised authority on business ethics and corporate governance; and Rochelle Murugan, Head of Audit at Forvis Mazars South Africa and a leader in diversity and inclusion. The discussion was facilitated by Prof Bernard Agulhas, former CEO of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors and an influential figure in global standard-setting and corporate governance.

According to Prof Frans Prinsloo, Director of the School of Accountancy, the event’s timing was deliberate: “Given the erosion of public confidence in leadership and the ongoing reports of corruption and abuse of power, it is crucial to address ethical leadership and public trust head-on. Our profession has a responsibility to lead conversations that promote integrity, accountability, and responsible leadership. These events give our profession and students the opportunity to hear directly from leaders who have shaped the national dialogue on these issues.”

 

Building a culture of ethics

Earlier in the day, Justice Zondo spoke directly to students who are preparing for careers in accounting and auditing, emphasising the importance of integrity in sustaining the profession’s credibility. “Your job is a very important job, and ethical behaviour is the only way your profession is going to continue to be respected. You must never let your profession down. Remember, your integrity is priceless,” he said. He also identified features of ethical leadership – integrity, fairness, humility, accountability, and courage – as non-negotiables for those entering the profession.

In the panel discussion, Murugan stressed that “the tone at the top plays a massive role” in shaping ethical cultures. She said leaders have a responsibility to create environments where ethical leadership and accountability are built into performance measures and reward systems. “Speaking up should be something we expect, respect, and protect,” she said, adding that embedding ethical policies into daily processes ensures they become a natural part of everyday work.

Prof Rossouw built on this point, noting that ethical tone must extend beyond the top levels of leadership. “We often find that the tone at the top does not filter down through the rest of the organisation. We need the same commitment to ethics across all employees,” he said, adding that an ethical culture requires clear standards, open discussions about ethics, and accountability. “If you do the wrong thing, there must be consequences. Equally, if you do the right thing, there should be recognition for the role you play,” he said, explaining that this approach allows employees at all levels to see themselves as active participants in an organisation’s ethical life.

 

Ethics in action: From Parliament to the public

Justice Zondo contributed a legal and governance perspective, drawing on an example from his time overseeing parliamentary processes. He recounted how, during a motion of no confidence in then-president Jacob Zuma, members of the ruling party were instructed to vote against the motion or risk losing their parliamentary seats. “This illustrates how individuals sometimes compromise their ethics out of fear for their positions,” he said. “In the public sector, the system can work against ethics when decisions are taken in the interest of the organisation rather than the people it serves. This undermines the fight against corruption.”

He also outlined three ways citizens can play a role in strengthening public accountability: avoiding the election of leaders with histories of wrongdoing; remaining active and vocal in holding public representatives accountable; and supporting or joining organisations that fight corruption. “Remember, people in Parliament work for you, not the other way around,” he told the audience.

Prof Rossouw offered a conceptual distinction between ethics and values, clarifying that, although the two are related, they are not identical. “Ethics is about doing good unto others as you expect them to do unto you. Values, on the other hand, are our priorities or convictions about what is important – but not all values are ethical. Ethical values are those that guide how we treat other people and interact with them,” he explained, describing ethics as a subset of an organisation’s broader values.

Underscoring why this conversation matters for the profession and the country, Prof Prinsloo noted: “Accounting and auditing are cornerstones of public accountability. Ethical leadership ensures these functions are performed with integrity and transparency. In South Africa, where there have been significant breaches of trust, the intersection of these three elements is vital. Ethical accounting and auditing practices, guided by strong ethical leadership, are essential for ensuring that public resources are managed responsibly and that those in positions of power are held accountable. In the School of Accountancy, we aim to equip our students with the skills and ethical grounding to navigate these complexities and uphold the highest standards of public accountability.”

Hosting thought leaders such as Justice Zondo and Prof Rossouw, he added, is both “a privilege” and a signal of intent: “By providing a platform for these important conversations, we signal to our students, alumni, and the broader community that we are serious about shaping ethical leaders and promoting a culture of accountability.”

The third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion continues the School of Accountancy’s commitment to convening rigorous, topical dialogue across auditing, governance, sustainability, and ethics – a commitment Prof Prinsloo says will endure: “We will continue to host conversations that challenge conventional thinking, bring together diverse voices, and provide students and practitioners with tools to strengthen ethical cultures in their organisations.”

News Archive

Protection of Information bill- opinions from our experts
2011-11-28

Prof. Hussein Solomon
Senior Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of the Free State. 

In recent years, given their failure to effectively govern, the ANC has become increasingly defensive. These defensive traits have become particularly acute in light of the various corruption scandals that members of the ruling party involve themselves in.
 
Given the fact that for now they are assured of an electoral majority (largely on account of their anti-apartheid credentials), coupled with the fact that they have managed to make parliament a rubber stamp of the executive as opposed to holding the executive accountable, it is the media which has increasingly held the ruling party to account by exposing such corruption and incompetence in government.
 
The passing of the information bill, therefore, is not merely an attack on the media, but an attack on the pivotal issue of accountability. Without accountability, there can be no democracy.
 
By defining national interest broadly, by refusing to accept a public interest clause in the bill, the ANC increasingly shows its disdain to South Africa's constitution and its citizens.
 
More importantly, as former Minister of Intelligence and ANC stalwart Ronnie Kasrils pointedly makes clear, the ANC is also betraying its own noble struggle against the odious apartheid regime. It was the media which played a key role in exposing apartheid's excesses, it is the same media which is coming under attack by the heirs of PW Botha's State Security Council - Minister of State Security Siyabong Cwele and his security apparatchiks whose mindsets reflect more Stalin's Gulag's than the values of the Freedom Charter.
 
The passing of this bill is also taking place at a time when journalists have had their phones attacked, where the judiciary has been deliberately undermined and parliament silenced.
 
Democrats beware!

 
Prof. Johann de Wet
Chairperson: Department of Communication Science 
 
The ANC’s insistence on passing the Protection of State Information Bill in its current form and enforcing it by law, means that the essence of our democratic state and the quality of life of every citizen is at stake.
 
Yes, our freedom as academics, researchers, mass media practitioners and citizens comes into play. Freedom implies the right to choose and is, along with equality, an underlying principle which helps make democracy happen. While the South African state needs to protect (classify) information which could threaten its security and/or survival, the omission of a public interest clause in the Bill at this stage effectively denies a citizen the right to freedom of information.
 
 Freedom of information, along with press freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association and religious freedom, are essential to democracy. These freedoms are granted because they conform to basic liberal ideas associated with (Western) democracy and which resonate with South Africa’s liberal constitution, such as (1) belief in the supreme value of the individual (and thus not of the state); (2) belief that the individual has natural rights (rights which belong to all human beings by nature – such as the right to life and to control government)) which exist independently of government, and which ought to be protected by and against government; and (3) recognition of the supreme value of the individual. 
 
One wonders how many cases of South African government corruption and mismanagement would have been uncovered by investigative journalists over the past number of years if this Bill in its current form was on the statute books. This Bill represents a backward step from the promise of democracy of having an informed public. The former National Party government had similar laws in place and one does not want to go there again. The infamous Information Scandal in South Africa of some thirty years ago, or Muldergate as it has come to be known, reminds one of what governments can do when it works clandestinely.
 
What South Africans need, is more information on what government structures are doing and how they are doing it with taxpayers’ money, not less information. While information in itself does not equal communication or dialogue, it is an indispensable part thereof, and the need for dialogue based on verifiable information is urgent for meeting vexed challenges facing South African communities. Academics in all fields of specialisation are constantly in need of untainted information to pursue answers and/or offer solutions to where South Africa should be moving in all spheres of life.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept