Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
15 August 2025 | Story Tshepo Tsotetsi
Business Acumen Day
The UFS School of Accountancy recently hosted its third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion, featuring former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, Prof Deon Rossouw, Rochelle Murugan, and Prof Bernard Agulhas.

The University of the Free State’s (UFS) School of Accountancy in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences hosted its third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion on 12 August 2025, placing ethics, integrity, and public trust firmly under the spotlight.

Sponsored by audit, accounting and consulting firm Forvis Mazars South Africa, the day opened with a student-centred engagement in the Callie Human Centre, followed by a dynamic panel discussion with staff and stakeholders at the Centenary Complex. Both sessions tackled the theme ‘Restoring Public Trust: Ethical Leadership in an Era of Public Accountability’.

The panel featured former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, whose decades in judicial service include leading the State Capture Commission; Prof Deon Rossouw, an internationally recognised authority on business ethics and corporate governance; and Rochelle Murugan, Head of Audit at Forvis Mazars South Africa and a leader in diversity and inclusion. The discussion was facilitated by Prof Bernard Agulhas, former CEO of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors and an influential figure in global standard-setting and corporate governance.

According to Prof Frans Prinsloo, Director of the School of Accountancy, the event’s timing was deliberate: “Given the erosion of public confidence in leadership and the ongoing reports of corruption and abuse of power, it is crucial to address ethical leadership and public trust head-on. Our profession has a responsibility to lead conversations that promote integrity, accountability, and responsible leadership. These events give our profession and students the opportunity to hear directly from leaders who have shaped the national dialogue on these issues.”

 

Building a culture of ethics

Earlier in the day, Justice Zondo spoke directly to students who are preparing for careers in accounting and auditing, emphasising the importance of integrity in sustaining the profession’s credibility. “Your job is a very important job, and ethical behaviour is the only way your profession is going to continue to be respected. You must never let your profession down. Remember, your integrity is priceless,” he said. He also identified features of ethical leadership – integrity, fairness, humility, accountability, and courage – as non-negotiables for those entering the profession.

In the panel discussion, Murugan stressed that “the tone at the top plays a massive role” in shaping ethical cultures. She said leaders have a responsibility to create environments where ethical leadership and accountability are built into performance measures and reward systems. “Speaking up should be something we expect, respect, and protect,” she said, adding that embedding ethical policies into daily processes ensures they become a natural part of everyday work.

Prof Rossouw built on this point, noting that ethical tone must extend beyond the top levels of leadership. “We often find that the tone at the top does not filter down through the rest of the organisation. We need the same commitment to ethics across all employees,” he said, adding that an ethical culture requires clear standards, open discussions about ethics, and accountability. “If you do the wrong thing, there must be consequences. Equally, if you do the right thing, there should be recognition for the role you play,” he said, explaining that this approach allows employees at all levels to see themselves as active participants in an organisation’s ethical life.

 

Ethics in action: From Parliament to the public

Justice Zondo contributed a legal and governance perspective, drawing on an example from his time overseeing parliamentary processes. He recounted how, during a motion of no confidence in then-president Jacob Zuma, members of the ruling party were instructed to vote against the motion or risk losing their parliamentary seats. “This illustrates how individuals sometimes compromise their ethics out of fear for their positions,” he said. “In the public sector, the system can work against ethics when decisions are taken in the interest of the organisation rather than the people it serves. This undermines the fight against corruption.”

He also outlined three ways citizens can play a role in strengthening public accountability: avoiding the election of leaders with histories of wrongdoing; remaining active and vocal in holding public representatives accountable; and supporting or joining organisations that fight corruption. “Remember, people in Parliament work for you, not the other way around,” he told the audience.

Prof Rossouw offered a conceptual distinction between ethics and values, clarifying that, although the two are related, they are not identical. “Ethics is about doing good unto others as you expect them to do unto you. Values, on the other hand, are our priorities or convictions about what is important – but not all values are ethical. Ethical values are those that guide how we treat other people and interact with them,” he explained, describing ethics as a subset of an organisation’s broader values.

Underscoring why this conversation matters for the profession and the country, Prof Prinsloo noted: “Accounting and auditing are cornerstones of public accountability. Ethical leadership ensures these functions are performed with integrity and transparency. In South Africa, where there have been significant breaches of trust, the intersection of these three elements is vital. Ethical accounting and auditing practices, guided by strong ethical leadership, are essential for ensuring that public resources are managed responsibly and that those in positions of power are held accountable. In the School of Accountancy, we aim to equip our students with the skills and ethical grounding to navigate these complexities and uphold the highest standards of public accountability.”

Hosting thought leaders such as Justice Zondo and Prof Rossouw, he added, is both “a privilege” and a signal of intent: “By providing a platform for these important conversations, we signal to our students, alumni, and the broader community that we are serious about shaping ethical leaders and promoting a culture of accountability.”

The third annual Business Acumen Day and Panel Discussion continues the School of Accountancy’s commitment to convening rigorous, topical dialogue across auditing, governance, sustainability, and ethics – a commitment Prof Prinsloo says will endure: “We will continue to host conversations that challenge conventional thinking, bring together diverse voices, and provide students and practitioners with tools to strengthen ethical cultures in their organisations.”

News Archive

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during Reconciliation Lecture
2014-03-05

“To forgive is not an obligation. It’s a choice.” – Prof Minow during the Third Annual Reconciliation Lecture entitled Forgiveness, Law and Justice.
Photo: Johan Roux

No one could have anticipated the atmosphere in which Prof Martha Minow would visit the Bloemfontein Campus. And no one could have predicted how apt the timing of her message would be. As this formidable Dean of Harvard University’s Law School stepped behind the podium, a latent tension edged through the crowded audience.

“The issue of getting along after conflict is urgent.”

With these few words, Prof Minow exposed the essence of not only her lecture, but also the central concern of the entire university community.

As an expert on issues surrounding racial justice, Prof Minow has worked across the globe in post-conflict societies. How can we prevent atrocities from happening? she asked. Her answer was an honest, “I don’t know.” What she is certain of, on the other hand, is that the usual practice of either silence or retribution does not work. “I think that silence produces rage – understandably – and retribution produces the cycle of violence. Rather than ignoring what happens, rather than retribution, it would be good to reach for something more.” This is where reconciliation comes in.

Prof Minow put forward the idea that forgiveness should accompany reconciliation efforts. She defined forgiveness as a conscious, deliberate decision to forego rightful grounds of resentment towards those who have committed a wrong. “To forgive then, in this definition, is not an obligation. It’s a choice. And it’s held by the one who was harmed,” she explained.

Letting go of resentment cannot be forced – not even by the law. What the law can do, though, is either to encourage or discourage forgiveness. Prof Minow showed how the law can construct adversarial processes that render forgiveness less likely, when indeed its intention was the opposite. “Or, law can give people chances to meet together in spaces where they may apologise and they may forgive,” she continued. This point introduced some surprising revelations about our Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

Indeed, studies do report ambivalence, disappointment and mixed views about the TRC. Whatever our views are on its success, Prof Minow reported that people across the world wonder how South African did it. “It may not work entirely inside the country; outside the country it’s had a huge effect. It’s a touchstone for transitional justice.”

The TRC “seems to have coincided with, and maybe contributed to, the relatively peaceful political transition to democracy that is, frankly, an absolute miracle.” What came as a surprise to many is this: the fact that the TRC has affected transitional justice efforts in forty jurisdictions, including Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Liberia. It has even inspired the creation of a TRC in Greensborough, North Carolina, in the United States.

There are no blueprints for solving conflict, though. “But the possibility of something other than criminal trials, something other than war, something other than silence – that’s why the TRC, I think, has been such an exemplar to the world,” she commended.

Court decision cannot rebuild a society, though. Only individuals can forgive. Only individuals can start with purposeful, daily decisions to forgive and forge a common future. Forgiveness is rather like kindness, she suggested. It’s a resource without limits. It’s not scarce like water or money. It’s within our reach. But if it’s forced, it’s not forgiveness.

“It is good,” Prof Minow warned, “to be cautious about the use of law to deliberately shape or manipulate the feelings of any individual. But it is no less important to admit that law does affect human beings, not just in its results, but in its process.” And then we must take responsibility for how we use that law.

“A government can judge, but only people can forgive.” As Prof Minow’s words lingered, the air suddenly seemed a bit more buoyant.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept