Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items

Ruth First’s legacy lives on: UFS launches powerful collection on activist research

21 July 2025 | Story Dr Nitha Ramnath | Photo Supplied

Vasu Reddy Saleem Badat News — Prof Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research and Internationalisation, and Prof Saleem Badat, Research Professor in the UFS Department of History, launch a new book honouring Ruth First’s activist legacy and scholarly impact.

On 16 July, during the Free State Arts Festival, the University of the Free State (UFS) launched Research and Activism: Ruth First & Activist Research, an incisive edited volume by Professors Vasu Reddy, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research and Internationalisation at the UFS, and Saleem Badat, Research Professor in the UFS Department of History.

The event was facilitated by Prof Christian Williams, Associate Professor of Anthropology, with Prof Reddy delivering the keynote address and Dr Lazlo Passemiers, Senior Lecturer in History, serving as respondent.

The important new work pays tribute to Ruth First - South African freedom fighter, journalist, intellectual, and scholar-activist, who’s unflinching pursuit of justice continues to resonate. Far from a closed chapter in South Africa’s struggle history, First’s legacy remains a compelling call to action for contemporary scholars, activists, and institutions: to confront injustice, speak with conviction, and pursue research rooted in ethical action.

A legacy of fearless scholarship

Ruth First’s activism was grounded in refusal to remain silent in the face of injustice. As a tenacious investigative journalist and public intellectual, she exposed the systemic violence of apartheid and challenged power through sharp incisive analysis and courageous advocacy. Her life, and her assassination by apartheid operatives in 1982, exemplify the personal and political costs of speaking truth to power.

Prof Vasu Reddy reflected that First “theorised, analysed, and connected the dots between racism, capitalism, and oppression, and refused to dilute her message for mass appeal.” Her words”, he said, “unsettled because they were true. Her activism “compels us to speak courageously, think critically, and act ethically. She turned ideas into instruments of liberation.”

Beyond the ivory tower

With contributions from 17 scholars, the volume examines themes ranging from climate justice and activism in Marikana to the ethics of legal practice, community engagement, and the role of the university in social transformation.

Prof Reddy emphasised that Ruth First’s example disrupts the traditional notions of academia. “Universities must be engines of social change, not ivory towers,” he argued. “Her legacy reminds us that activist research is about standing with the marginalised, and not merely studying them.”

Dr Passemiers echoed this view, describing First as one of South Africa’s foremost examples of blending impactful activism with rigorous scholarship. “Her activism was often transnational, connecting South Africa’s liberation struggle with broader regional movements. This perspective is especially relevant today, as many of our challenges transcend national borders.”

He added that the book should be required reading for students in the social sciences and humanities, as it “challenges misconceptions about activist research and shows how scholarship can contribute meaningfully to public life, beyond academic debate.”

Redefining academic activism

Prof Christian Williams underscored one of the book’s central provocations: to set a litmus test for genuine activist research. He argued that activism and scholarship can compete with one another, but should, following First’s example, be intersecting commitments. “There is no true academic neutrality,” he noted.

Members of the audience also touched on related themes pertaining to the role of universities in society, responding to the book’s content as narrated at the launch. For example, the collection interrogates how universities often claim to be ‘engaged’ while aligning primarily with business, the state, and elite interests. True activist research, the contributors argue, must connect with social movements and confront power, not shy away from it. Members of the audience reflected on this point, considering what it means for researchers to do activist research amidst attacks on social justice-oriented programmes in higher education globally.

In Prof Reddy’s final comments, he returned to the importance of First for debates about the university’s role. “This is unfinished business. The story of Ruth First, and of activist scholarship, is not fully told”, says Prof Reddy. As he noted, Research and Activism offers both a tribute to Ruth First and a powerful reminder of the work still to be done. “Her life triggers us to think deeply about real-world issues, not as abstract concepts but as urgent matters of justice and humanity.”

Research and Activism: Ruth First & Activist Research is available for free download via the ESI Press website.

News Archive

Stem cell research and human cloning: legal and ethical focal points

2004-07-29

(Summary of the inaugural lecture of Prof Hennie Oosthuizen, from the Department of Criminal and Medical Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of the Free State.)

In the light of stem cell research, research on embryo’s and human cloning it will be fatal for legal advisors and researchers in South Africa to ignore the benefits that new bio-medical development, through research, contain for this country.

Legal advisors across the world have various views on stem cell research and human cloning. In the USA there is no legislation that regulates stem cell research but a number of States adopted legislation that approves stem cell research. The British Parlement gave permission for research on embryonic stem cells, but determined that it must be monitored closely and the European Union is of the opinion that it will open a door for race purification and commercial exploitation of human beings.

In South Africa the Bill on National Health makes provision for therapeutical and non therapeutical research. It also makes provision for therapeutical embryonical stem cell research on fetuses, which is not older than 14 days, as well as for therapeutical cloning under certain circumstances subject to the approval of the Minister. The Bill prohibits reproductive cloning.

Research on human embrio’s is a very controversial issue, here and in the rest of the world.

Researchers believe that the use of stem cell therapy could help to side-step the rejection of newly transplanted organs and tissue and if a bank for stem cell could be built, the shortage of organs for transplants would become something of the past. Stem cells could also be used for healing of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and spinal injuries.

Sources from which stem cells are obtained could also lead to further ethical issues. Stem cells are harvested from mature human cells and embryonic stem cells. Another source to be utilised is to take egg cells from the ovaries of aborted fetuses. This will be morally unacceptable for those against abortions. Linking a financial incentive to that could become more of a controversial issue because the woman’s decision to abort could be influenced. The ideal would be to rather use human fetus tissue from spontaneous abortions or extra-uterine pregnancies than induced abortions.

The potential to obtain stem cells from the blood of the umbilical cord, bone-marrow and fetus tissue and for these cells to arrange themselves is known for quite some time. Blood from the umbilical cord contains many stem cells, which is the origin of the body’s immune and blood system. It is beneficial to bank the blood of a newborn baby’s umbilical cord. Through stem cell transplants the baby or another family member’s life could be saved from future illnesses such as anemia, leukemia and metabolic storing disabilities as well as certain generic immuno disabilities.

The possibility to withdraw stem cells from human embrio’s and to grow them is more useable because it has more treatment possibilities.

With the birth of Dolly the sheep, communities strongly expressed their concern about the possibility that a new cloning technique such as the replacement of the core of a cell will be used in human reproduction. Embryonic splitting and core replacement are two well known techniques that are associated with the cloning process.

I differentiate between reproductive cloning – to create a cloned human embryo with the aim to bring about a pregnancy of a child that is identical to another individual – and therapeutically cloning – to create a cloned human embryo for research purposes and for healing human illnesses.

Worldwide people are debating whether to proceed with therapeutical cloning. There are people for and against it. The biggest ethical objection against therapeutical cloning is the termination of the development of a potential human being.

Children born from cloning will differ from each other. Factors such as the uterus environment and the environment in which the child is growing up will play a role. Cloning create unique children that will grow up to be unique individuals, just like me and you that will develop into a person, just like you and me. If we understand this scientific fact, most arguments against human cloning will disappear.

Infertility can be treated through in vitro conception. This process does not work for everyone. For some cloning is a revolutionary treatment method because it is the only method that does not require patients to produce sperm and egg cells. The same arguments that were used against in vitro conception in the past are now being used against cloning. It is years later and in vitro cloning is generally applied and accepted by society. I am of the opinion that the same will happen with regard to human cloning.

There is an argument that cloning must be prohibited because it is unsafe. Distorted ideas in this regard were proven wrong. Are these distorted ideas justified to question the safety of cloning and the cloning process you may ask. The answer, according to me, is a definite no. Human cloning does have many advantages. That includes assistance with infertility, prevention of Down Syndrome and recovery from leukemia.

Back

Economic and Management Sciences

Education

Health Sciences

The Humanities

Law

Natural and Agricultural Sciences

Theology and Religion

Open Distance Learning

Business School

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept