Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
25 June 2025 | Story Andre Damons | Photo Andre Damons
Prof Matlalepula Matsabisa
Prof Motlalepula Matsabisa, renowned African Traditional Medicine expert and pharmacology researcher from the University of the Free State (UFS) will co-chair the World Health Organisation Global Traditional Medicine Summit steering committee.

Prof Motlalepula Matsabisa, renowned African Traditional Medicine expert and pharmacology researcher from the University of the Free State (UFS) has recently been elected a co-chairperson of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Global Traditional Medicine Summit steering committee. The other co-chairperson is Dr Goh Cheng Soon from Malaysia. 

The steering committee, which is appointed for one year, will help the WHO to organise the WHO Traditional Medicines Global Summit taking place later this year in New Delhi, India. The steering committee is also an advisory body to the WHO and the Global Traditional Medicine Centre to provide reviews and recommendations for the WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit coordination, propose summit sessions and session speakers. This committee has 15 members from South Africa, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Ghana, India, China, Bhutan, Germany, Brazil, Egypt, New Zealand, US, Netherlands, Switzerland and Bolivia.

Prof Matsabisa, Research Director of the African Medicines Innovations and Technologies Development (AMITD) platform at the UFS, is also the chairperson of the WHO Africa Regional Expert Advisory Committee on Traditional Medicine (REACT)

 

Responsibility of the committee 

“Once more this is an honour for me to take this task and lead a group of experts – not just from the African continent where I am currently the chairperson of the WHO Afro REACT committee, but now I chair experts from all the continents and all six WHO geographical regions – namely Africa (Afro), the Americas (AMRO), the eastern Mediterranean (EMRO), Europe (EURO), South East Asia (SEARO) and the Western Pacific (WPRO). I chair a worldwide group of experts,” says Prof Matsabisa. 

According to him, the committee will work with WHO to design the summit programme, identify summit sessions and session speakers, as well as recommend ministers to be in the round-table discussions. The committee will also be responsible for the design of the exhibitions that will showcase traditional medicine products and practices across all six WHO regions. The identification of the sessions will be around action and delivery on the priority agenda from the past 2023 WHO Global summit as well as from the deliverables of the WHO 2025-2034 Traditional Medicines strategy. 

The theme for the WHO Traditional Medicines Global Summit is “Restoring balance for people and planet. The science and practice of health and well-being”. They anticipate attracting 6 000 people, from all over, to attend the summit with at least 1 000 in-person attendees and another 5 000 online participants. 

The committee will look at the first WHO 2023 Traditional Medicines Global summit and its Gujarat Declaration where the Traditional Medicine (TM) priority agenda was set – this priority agenda included global leadership, research and evidence, universal health coverage (UHC), primary health care (PHC) health systems, data and routine information systems, biodiversity and sustainability.

 

Market the UFS 

When a call for applications to serve on the steering committee went out, Prof Matsabisa applied and was later approached by the WHO to chair the steering and advisory committee. “I see this as an opportunity to serve the WHO and use my knowledge and skills to serve the world. I felt very honoured to have been approached for such an important job and role to undertake. As a chairperson, I will guide the committee, take responsibility for the planning and implementation of the summit. I will market the summit. I shall be the direct link between the WHO in Geneva and the committee.”

Prof Matsabisa indicated that he will use the chairmanship to market and internationalise the UFS AMITD programme and give it a further global outlook. He will also find new collaborators and potential funders and investors for projects and activities of the UFS and secure activities that will help find and fund global postdoctoral fellows and visiting scholars. This will be good for the AMITD platform.

“The steering committee shall set the 2nd WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit theme for scale up learning, collaboration and action,” says Prof Matsabisa. “Therefore, the committee will design the summit programme to address these and take themes and discussions from high-level political commitments, building on UNGA, WHA, G20, BRICS, and AU etc. Launches of the WHO Global TM Library on Traditional Medicine; WHO Bulletin special issue on Traditional Medicine; TM Innovation and Investment Initiative; Global TM Research Roadmap; Global TM Data Network; and Learnings from Indigenous Knowledge will also take place.”

Furthermore, advancements of healthy ecosystems and TM integration and encouraging indigenous people's knowledge exchange; and AI and TM governance course/ brief as well as the advancing of cross-cutting frameworks for TM-related ethics, rights, IP, equitable access and benefits are on the agenda. 

News Archive

Council on Higher Education LLB qualification review not yet complete
2017-05-16

The reaction from various stakeholders following the ‘Outcomes of the National Review of the LLB Qualification’ by the Council on Higher Education (CHE) on 12 April 2017 requires the CHE to clarify that the national review process has not been completed and is ongoing.

The peer-review process conducted under the auspices of the CHE is based on the LLB Standards Document which was developed in 2014-2015 with input from higher-education institutions and the organised legal profession. Following self-review and site visits by peers, the process is now at the point where commendations and shortcomings have been identified, and the statement of 12 April reflects those findings. All law faculties and schools have been asked to improve their LLB programmes to meet the LLB Standard, and no LLB programme has been de-accredited. All institutions retain the accreditation they had before the Review process began and all institutions are working towards retaining their accreditation and improving their LLB programmes.

The South African Law Deans’ Association (SALDA) has issued a set of responses regarding the LLB programme review. The following questions and answers were published to give more clarity on the questions raised.

1.    What is the effect of a finding of conditional accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

(“Accreditation refers to a recognition status granted to a programme for a stipulated period of time after an HEQC evaluation indicates that it meets minimum standards of quality.”)

The institution must submit a progress report by 6 October 2017 that indicates how short-term aspects raised in the HEQC reports have been addressed and an improvement plan to indicate how longer-term aspects will be addressed.

2.    What is the effect of a finding of notice of withdrawal of accreditation?
The programme remains accredited.

The institution must submit an improvement plan by 6 October 2017 to indicate how the issues raised in the HEQC report will be addressed, including time frames.

3.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect current students?
Students currently enrolled for the LLB programme at any institution are not affected at all. They will graduate with an accredited qualification.

4.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect new applicants?
The programmes remain accredited and institutions may enrol new students as usual. This also includes students completing BA/BCom (Law) programmes who wish to continue with the LLB programme.

5.    How does the finding of notice of withdrawal affect prior graduates?
Degrees previously conferred are not affected.

6.    What happens when the improvement plans are submitted in October 2017?
The CHE will evaluate the plans when they are submitted, and the programmes remain accredited until a decision is taken whether the improvement plan is sufficient and has been fully given effect to or not. The institutions will have to submit progress reports to the CHE indicating implementation of measures contained in the improvement plan.

Should a decision at some stage be taken that a programme’s accreditation must be withdrawn, a teaching-out plan would be implemented so that all enrolled students would have the opportunity to graduate with an accredited degree.

For more information on the CHE’s pronouncement please contact Moleboheng Moshe-Bereng on MosheBerengMF@ufs.ac.za.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept