Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
18 June 2025 | Story Lacea Loader
UFS
The University of the Free State (UFS) is committed to multilingualism to promote access, inclusivity, academic success, and a sense of belonging through its five working languages.

The University of the Free State (UFS) is committed to the promotion of multilingualism for equitable access to knowledge and academic success for all its students, scholarship of research, inclusivity and social cohesion, and for a strong sense of belonging through the use of five working languages, i.e. Sesotho, South African Sign Language, isiZulu, Afrikaans, and English in various contexts of its operation.
 
According to the UFS Language Policy (2023), English is the language of instruction at the university, except in language-specific disciplines, modules, and programmes (such as Afrikaans, Arabic, Dutch, German, French, IsiZulu, Sesotho, and South African Sign Language) at undergraduate and postgraduate level on all three UFS campuses. Lectures, study materials, examinations, and related materials are in English, except in disciplines where languages other than English are explicitly taught as subjects of study or used for teaching and assessment purposes.
 
Contrary to what has recently been reported in the media, Afrikaans is and will remain a language of the UFS and the promotion of Afrikaans is equally important as that of Sesotho, South African Sign Language, isiZulu, and English.
 
In recent years, priority has been given to the development and intellectualisation of Sesotho and South African Sign Language. However, the promotion of Afrikaans and IsiZulu as UFS languages remains important to ensure that speakers enjoy the right to receive academic support in the languages they best understand and prefer.
 
Through its Academy for Multilingualism, various projects and initiatives are underway in support of the university’s approach to multilingualism and to guarantee that all UFS languages are promoted and treated with equal importance. This includes, for instance, the provision of Afrikaans terminology lists for various disciplines to match the Sesotho terminology lists developed by the UFS, and isiZulu terminology lists (adapted from the University of KwaZulu-Natal through a Memorandum of Understanding). The UFS is, for instance, already championing the development of terminology for Psychology in South African Sign Language.

 

VERKLARING: BEVORDERING VAN AMPTELIKE TALE AAN DIE UV 

Die Universiteit van die Vrystaat (UV) is verbind tot die bevordering van veeltaligheid vir billike toegang tot kennis en akademiese sukses vir al sy studente, vakkundigheid van navorsing, inklusiwiteit en sosiale kohesie, en vir ’n sterk gevoel van samehorigheid deur die gebruik van vyf werkstale, dit wil sê Suid-Sotho, Suid-Afrikaanse Gebaretaal, Zoeloe, Afrikaans en Engels in verskillende kontekste van sy werksaamhede.
 
Volgens die UV-Taalbeleid (2023) is Engels die onderrigtaal aan die universiteit, behalwe in taalspesifieke dissiplines, modules en programme (soos Afrikaans, Arabies, Nederlands, Duits, Frans, Zoeloe, Suid-Sotho en Suid-Afrikaanse Gebaretaal) op voor- en nagraadse vlak op al drie UV-kampusse. Lesings, studiemateriaal, eksamens en verwante materiaal is in Engels, behalwe in dissiplines waar ander tale as Engels uitdruklik as studievakke onderrig word of vir onderrig- en assesseringsdoeleindes gebruik word.
 
Anders as wat onlangs in die media berig is, is en sal Afrikaans ’n taal van die UV bly en is die bevordering van Afrikaans ewe belangrik as dié van Suid-Sotho, Suid-Afrikaanse Gebaretaal, Zoeloe en Engels.
 
In onlangse jare is prioriteit gegee aan die ontwikkeling en intellektualisering van Suid-Sotho en Suid-Afrikaanse Gebaretaal. Die bevordering van Afrikaans en Zoeloe as UV-tale bly egter belangrik om te verseker dat sprekers die reg geniet om akademiese ondersteuning te ontvang in die tale wat hulle die beste verstaan en verkies.
 

Deur middel van sy Akademie vir Meertaligheid is verskeie projekte en inisiatiewe aan die gang ter ondersteuning van die universiteit se benadering tot veeltaligheid en om te verseker dat alle UV-tale bevorder word en met gelyke belangrikheid hanteer word. Dit sluit byvoorbeeld in die verskaffing van Afrikaanse terminologielyste vir verskeie dissiplines om te pas by die Suid-Sotho-terminologielyste wat deur die UV ontwikkel is, asook die Zoeloe-terminologielyste (aangepas vanaf die Universiteit van KwaZulu-Natal deur middel van ’n Memorandum van Verstandhouding). Die UV beywer hom byvoorbeeld reeds vir die ontwikkeling van Sielkunde-terminologie in Suid-Afrikaanse Gebaretaal.

 

SETATEMENTE: PHAHAMISO YA DIPUO TSA SEMMUSO TSA YUNIVESITHI YA FREISTATA

Yunivesithi ya Freistata, e ikemiseditse ho phahamisa botemengata mabapi le ho fumana tsebo ka mokgwa o lekanang ekasita le ho bona katleho ya baithuti bohle ditabeng tsa thuto, boithutong ba diphuputso, kananelo ya batho bohle le ditabeng tsa phedisano, ho kgothaletsa maikutlo a kutlwano ka tshebediso ya dipuo tse hlano tse sebediswang maemong a fapaneng mona yunivesithing, e leng Sesotho, Puo ya Matsoho ya Afrika Borwa, isiZulu, Afrikaans, le English.

Ho ya ka Leano la Puo la Yunivesithi ya Freistata (2023), English ke puo ya thuto mona yunivesithing, ka ntle le moo thuto e leng ya puo eitseng, moo mojolu e leng  wa puo eitseng, le moo lenaneho la thuto e leng la puo eitseng (jwalo ka puo ya Afrikaans, Arabic, Dutch, German, French, isiZulu, Sesotho le Puo ya Matsoho ya Afrika Borwa), haholo boemong ba dithuto tse tlase le  boemong ba dithuto tse hodimo, dikhemphaseng tse tharo tsa Yunivesithi ya Freistata. Dithuto, dingodilweng tsa thuto, dihlahlobo le tse ding, di ngotswe ka puo ya English, ka ntle le dithuto tsa dipuo tseo e seng tsa English, tsona di rutwa le hlahlojwa ka dipuo tsa tsona.

Ho fapana le se tlalehilweng masedinyaneng, puo ya Afrikaans ke puo mme e tla dula e le teng Yunivesithing ya Freistata, phahamiso ya Afrikaans e bohlokwa jwalo ka dipuo tse kang puo ya Sesotho, Puo ya Matsoho ya Afrika Borwa, puo ya  isiZulu le puo ya English.

Dilemong tsa moraorao tjena, puo ya Sesotho le puo ya Matsoho ya Afrika Borwa, di behelletswe ka sehloohong mabapi le ho ntshetswa pele ekasitana le ho ntlafatswa hore di sebediswe boithutong ba diphuputso le mahlale. Le ha ho le jwalo, phahamiso ya  puo ya Afrikaans le puo ya isiZulu jwalo ka dipuo tsa Yunivesithi ya Freistata, e tla dula e le ntho ya bohlokwa ho etsa bonnete ba hore beng ba dipuo tsena, ba na le tokelo ya ho fumana tshehetso ya thuto ka dipuo tseo ba di utlwisisang le ho di rata.

Ka tshebediso ya Akhademi ya Botemengata, diprojeke le meralo ya ntshetsopele di motjheng ho tshehetsa mokgwa wa Botemengata yunivesithing  ekasitana le ho nnetefatsa hore dipuo tsohle di a phahamiswa mme di tshwarwa ka tsela e lekanang.  Mohlala, taba ena e kenya diprojeke tse kang ntshetsopele ya mareho a puo ya Afrikaans bakeng sa dithuto tse fapaneng ho latela tshwano e teng  marehong  a puo ya Sesotho a entsweng ke Yunivesithi ena ya Freistata, hape le ho latela tshwano e teng marehong a puo ya isiZulu (a nkilweng Yunivesithing ya KwaZulu -Natala ho ya ka Memorandamo ya Kutlwuno). Yunivesithi ya Freistata, ha re etsa mohlala, e se e ntse e tswela pele ho etsa mareho a thuto ya Saekholoji ka puong ya Matsoho ya Afrika Borwa.

 

ISITATIMENDE-MBIKO: UKUQHAKANJISWA KWEZILIMI EZIGUNYAZIWE ZE-UFS

INyuvesi yase-Free State (UFS) izibophezele ekuqhakambiseni ubuliminingi ngenhloso yokunikezela ngolwazi ngendlela elinganayo nokuphumelelisa abafundi bayo bonke, ukuphumelelisa ezocwaningo, ukuqhakambisa umoya wozwano nokuhlanganyela, kanye nomuzwa onamandla wokuthi umuntu-nomuntu azizwe eyilunga eliqavile ngokusebenzisa izilimi ezigunyaziwe okuyisiSuthu, Ulimi lweZandla lwaseNingizimu Afrikha, isiZulu, isiBhunu, kanye nesiNgisi eminxeni yayo ehlukahlukene yezinhlelo zayo.

NgokweNqubomgomo yoLimi ye-UFS eyethulwa ngowezi-2023, isiNgisi yilona limi lezinhlelo zonke zenyuvesi, ngaphandle kwemikhakha, kwezifundo kanye nezinhlelo ezivele ezisebenza ngezinye izilimi (njengesiBhunu, isi-Arabhu, isiDashi, isiJalimane, isiFrentshi, isiZulu, isiSuthu kanye noLimi lweZandla lwaseNingizimu Afrikha) emabangeni aphansi (undergraduate) naphezulu (postgraduate) kuwo wonke amakhempasi ayo. Izethulo, izinsiza-kufunda/-kufundisa, izivinyo zokuphothula izifundo kanye nolunye ulwazi oluhlobene nakho kungolimi lwesiNgisi, ngaphandle kwemikhakha lapho khona kusebenza ngqo olunye ulimi njengesifundo noma njengolimi lokufundisa nokwenza imisebenzi yezifundo.

Ekubhekeni okuphambene okusanda kubhalwa izintatheli, isiBhunu siwulimi futhi sisazoqhubeka sibe ulimi lwe-UFS, kanti futhi ukuqhakanjiswa kwaso kubaluleke ngendlela efanayo nalokho kwesiSuthu, Ulimi lweZandla lwaseNingizimu Afrikha, isiZulu kanye nesiNgisi.

Eminyakeni edlule injolozela ibihlonywe kakhulu ekuthuthukiseni nasekuvanyisweni kwesiSuthu kanye noLimi lweZandla lwaseNingizimu Afrikha. Noma kunjalo, ukuqhakanjiswa kwesiBhunu nesiZulu njengezilimi ze-UFS kusabalulekile ngesizathu sokuqinisekisa ukuthi abanikazi bazo lezi zilimi bayalithakasela ilungelo lokuthola ukusizakala ngokwemfundo ephakeme ngezilimi abazizwa kangcono futhi abazincamelayo.

Ngokusebenzisa ihhovisi lesikhungo sobuliminingi sayo i-Academy for Multilingualism, izinhlelo ezahlukahlukene nemizamo ehlabahlosile sekuvele kusemgangathweni ngenhloso yokwelekelela umhlahlandlela wenyuvesi wobuliminingi kanye nokuqinisekisa ukuthi zonke izilimi ze-UFS ziyaqhakanjiswa futhi ziphathwa ngokubaluleka okulinganayo. Isibonelo, lokhu kubandakanya ukunikezelwa kohlu lwamatemu esiBhunu oluchuma imikhakha enhlobonhlobo ngenhloso yokuhambisana nohlu lwamatemu esiSuthu aqanjwe i-UFS, kanye nohlu lwamatemu esiZulu (athathwe eNyuvesi yaKwaZulu Natali ngendlela yesivumelwano esisayinwe izinhlaka zombili). Isibonelo, i-UFS isivele isiqalile iphethe uhlelo lokuthuthukiswa kohlu lwamatemu ezifundo eziphathelene nomqondo, phecelezi iPsychology isebenzisa Ulimi lweZandla lwaseNingizimu Afrikha.

 

Issued by:
Lacea Loader
Senior Director: Communication and Marketing
University of the Free State 

News Archive

Bloemfontein's quality of tap water compares very favourably with bottled water
2009-08-04

The quality of the drinking water of five suburbs in Bloemfontein is at least as good as or better than bottled water. This is the result of a standard and chemical bacterial analysis done by the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Centre for Environmental Management in collaboration with the Institute for Groundwater Studies (IGS).

Five samples were taken from tap water sources in the suburbs of Universitas, Brandwag, Bain’s Vlei, Langenhoven Park and Bayswater and 15 samples were taken of different brands of still and unflavoured bottled water. The samples were analysed at the laboratory of the IGS, while the interpretation of the analysis was done by the Centre for Environmental Management.

“We wanted to evaluate the difference in quality for human consumption between tap water and that of the different brands of bottled water,” said Prof. Maitland Seaman, Head of the Centre for Environmental Management.

“With the exception of two samples produced by multinational companies at their plants in South Africa, the different brands of bottled water used for the study were produced by South African companies, including a local small-scale Bloemfontein producer,” said Prof. Seaman.

According to the labels, the sources of the water vary from pure spring water, to partial reverse osmosis (as an aid to standardise salt, i.e. mineral, content), to only reverse osmosis (to remove salts). (Reverse osmosis is a process in which water is forced under pressure through a pipe with minute pores through which water passes but no – or very low concentrations of – salts pass.)

According to Prof. Seaman, the analysis revealed some interesting findings, such as:

• It is generally accepted that drinking water should have an acceptable level of salt content, as the body needs salts. Most mineral contents were relatively higher in the tap water samples than the bottled water samples and were very much within the acceptable range of drinkable water quality. One of the bottled samples, however, had a very low mineral content, as the water was produced by reverse osmosis, as stated on the bottle. While reverse osmosis is used by various producers, most producers use it as an aid, not as a single method to remove nearly all the salts. Drinking only such water over a prolonged period may probably have a negative effect on the human physiology.

• The pH values of the tap water samples (8,12–8,40) were found to be slightly higher (slightly alkaline), like in all south-eastern Free State rivers (from where the water is sourced) than the pH of most of the bottled water samples, most of which are sourced and/or treated in other areas. Two brands of bottled water were found to have relatively low pH levels (both 4,5, i.e. acidic) as indicated on their bottles and as confirmed by the IGS analysis. The health implication of this range of pH is not significant.

• The analysis showed differences in the mineral content given on the labels of most of the water bottles compared to that found by IGS analysis. The possibility of seasonal fluctuation in content, depending on various factors, is expected and most of the bottling companies also indicate this on their labels. What was a rather interesting finding was that two pairs of bottled water brands claimed exactly the same mineral content but appeared under different brand names and were also priced differently. In each case, one of the pair was a well-known house brand, and the other obviously the original producer. In one of these paired cases, the house brand stated that the water was spring water, while the other (identical) “original” brand stated that it was spring water treated by reverse osmosis and oxygen-enriched.

• Nitrate (NO3) levels were uniformly low except in one bottled sample, suggesting a low (non-threatening) level of organic pollution in the source water. Otherwise, none of the water showed any sign of pollution.

• The bacterial analysis confirmed the absence of any traces of coliforms or E.coli in any of the samples, as was also indicated by the bottling companies. This is very reassuring. What is not known is how all these waters were sterilised, which could be anything from irradiation to chlorine or ozone treatment.

• The price of the different brands of bottled water, each containing 500 ml of still water, ranged between R3,99 and R8,99, with R5,03 being the average price. A comparison between the least expensive and the most expensive bottles of water indicated no significant difference in quality. In fact, discrepancies were observed in the most expensive bottle in that the amount of Calcium (Ca) claimed to be present in it was found to be significantly different from what the analysis indicated (29,6 mg/l versus 0,92 mg/l). The alkalinity (CaCO3 mg/l) indicated on the bottle was also found to differ considerably (83 mg/l versus 9,4 mg/l). The concentration of Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) was not given on the product.

“The preference for bottled water as compared to Bloemfontein’s tap water from a qualitative perspective as well as the price discrepancy is unjustifiable. The environmental footprint of bottled water is also large. Sourcing, treating, bottling, packaging and transporting, to mention but a few of the steps involved in the processing of bottled water, entail a huge carbon footprint, as well as a large water footprint, because it also requires water for treating and rinsing to process bottled water,” said Prof. Seaman.

Media Release
Lacea Loader
Deputy Director: Media Liaison
Tel: 051 401 2584
Cell: 083 645 2454
E-mail: loaderl.stg@ufs.ac.za  
3 August 2009

 

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept