Latest News Archive

Please select Category, Year, and then Month to display items
Previous Archive
02 June 2025 | Story Leonie Bolleurs | Photo Supplied
Dr Lucia Meko
Dr Lucia Meko believes that face-to-face engagement helps students become more empathetic, culturally aware health professionals.

In South Africa, the streets often tell stories of contrasts where wealth and poverty, tradition and modernity, and diverse cultures meet at the same intersection. It is a place where neighbours may speak different languages, worship in different ways, and sit down to very different meals. These everyday differences do not just influence how people live – they shape what ends up on their plates.

According to Dr Lucia Meko, Senior Lecturer and Head of the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of the Free State (UFS), dietitians play an important role in such a diverse landscape. “Their mission is to empower individuals and communities to make informed, healthy food choices that support long-term well-being. According to the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), dietitians are trained to provide personalised nutrition counselling aimed at preventing and managing diet-related diseases,” she says.

“This means that whether someone is dealing with diabetes, high blood pressure, or simply trying to improve their eating habits, a dietitian can offer guidance tailored to their unique needs and circumstances.”

However, Dr Meko believes that while theory is important, many students only truly understand the reality of their future clients when they experience it first-hand. At the UFS, students do not have to wait until the end of their degrees to gain this insight. Community service learning begins in their very first year.

This approach immerses students in the communities they will eventually serve, offering a practical education that goes beyond textbooks. By working directly with communities, students gain a deeper appreciation of the challenges individuals face in making healthy food choices,” she says.

“These experiences help shape well-rounded professionals who are not only knowledgeable but also empathetic and culturally aware,” adds Dr Meko.

Unlike traditional volunteering, this is structured learning with clear outcomes. Students apply classroom theory to real-world issues while simultaneously giving back. Through this process, students develop critical thinking, cultural competence, and the ability to communicate health information in ways that are relevant and respectful,” she explains.

 

What really happens on the ground

To understand what this looks like in practice, Dr Meko points to a research study conducted by the department. It examines the experiences of fourth-year students during a Community Nutrition Module internship. This internship is one of eight work-integrated learning (WIL) components in the module.

In this particular placement, students work in Ward 51 in Mangaung, visiting homes and engaging directly with residents. During each visit, they profile the community member’s demographics, measure nutritional status (using weight and height), and assess dietary patterns. Afterward, they offer tailored dietary counselling.

Beyond individual visits, students also explore the broader food environment: visiting supermarkets, vegetable gardens, early childhood centres, and street vendors all form part of their learning.

Importantly, this programme is not one-sided. Feedback from both students and community members is gathered to improve the experience and assess its impact.

So far, early findings are promising. Students not only learned; they were transformed. Interestingly, students mostly showed appreciation for their own privileges in comparison to the disadvantaged communities they visited,” says Dr Meko. One student reflected: “It humbled me and made me very grateful for all that I have, because I think we really lose sight of that sometimes.”

After a township tour, another student admitted: This was very insightful, as we often have stereotypes about the way people live and what people eat, simply because of where they live.”

In a cooking activity, students were challenged to apply dietary guidelines in real kitchens. The outcome? A deeper understanding of the barriers faced by many. “Dietetic guidelines we have given to some patients were really put into perspective, as cooking with less salt is not as easy as we think,” says Dr Meko, quoting student feedback.

Some even used what they learned in other placements. One student took a simple grocery list she developed during her internship to the hospital setting: “It is the most practical way to influence someone to shop differently.”

Others were inspired to continue working in food access. “I was impressed with the size of the vegetable gardens and was also inspired to be part of projects like these in the future,” shared another student.

Perhaps one of the most powerful observations came from a student who said: “I feel empowered but also sad to see that this is how most of the country is living and that we can make a difference, no matter how small.”

 

A lasting impact for both student and community

For Dr Meko, this is exactly what service learning should achieve. “While lectures and textbooks can teach the theory behind intercultural competence, it’s the face-to-face interactions – listening to people’s stories, understanding their struggles, and working alongside them – that truly bring those lessons to life.”

She adds that this kind of learning also builds stronger, more respectful relationships between the university and the communities it serves. “It fosters partnerships built on mutual respect, shared goals, and the exchange of knowledge and resources – locally and beyond.”

Community service learning is not just a tick-box exercise. In the UFS Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, it is a meaningful bridge between knowledge and empathy, between theory and reality, and – most importantly – between future dietitians and the people whose lives they hope to improve.

News Archive

Inaugural lecture: Prof. Phillipe Burger
2007-11-26

 

Attending the lecture were, from the left: Prof. Tienie Crous (Dean of the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at the UFS), Prof. Phillipe Burger (Departmental Chairperson of the Department of Economics at the UFS), and Prof. Frederick Fourie (Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the UFS).
Photo: Stephen Collet

 
A summary of an inaugural lecture presented by Prof. Phillipe Burger on the topic: “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

South African business cycle shows reduction in volatility

Better monetary policy and improvements in the financial sector that place less liquidity constraints on individuals is one of the main reasons for the reduction in the volatility of the South African economy. The improvement in access to the financial sector also enables individuals to manage their debt better.

These are some of the findings in an analysis on the volatility of the South African business cycle done by Prof. Philippe Burger, Departmental Chairperson of the University of the Free State’s (UFS) Department of Economics.

Prof. Burger delivered his inaugural lecture last night (22 November 2007) on the Main Campus in Bloemfontein on the topic “The ups and downs of the South African Economy: Rough seas or smooth sailing?”

In his lecture, Prof. Burger emphasised a few key aspects of the South African business cycle and indicated how it changed during the periods 1960-1976, 1976-1994 en 1994-2006.

With the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as an indicator of the business cycle, the analysis identified the variables that showed the highest correlation with the GDP. During the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006, these included durable consumption, manufacturing investment, private sector investment, as well as investment in machinery and non-residential buildings. Other variables that also show a high correlation with the GDP are imports, non-durable consumption, investment in the financial services sector, investment by general government, as well as investment in residential buildings.

Prof. Burger’s analysis also shows that changes in durable consumption, investment in the manufacturing sector, investment in the private sector, as well as investment in non-residential buildings preceded changes in the GDP. If changes in a variable such as durable consumption precede changes in the GDP, it is an indication that durable consumption is one of the drivers of the business cycle. The up or down swing of durable consumption may, in other words, just as well contribute to an up or down swing in the business cycle.

A surprising finding of the analysis is the particularly strong role durable consumption has played in the business cycle since 1994. This finding is especially surprising due to the fact that durable consumption only constitutes about 12% of the total household consumption.

A further surprising finding is the particularly small role exports have been playing since 1960 as a driver of the business cycle. In South Africa it is still generally accepted that exports are one of the most important drivers of the business cycle. It is generally accepted that, should the business cycles of South Africa’s most important trade partners show an upward phase; these partners will purchase more from South Africa. This increase in exports will contribute to the South African economy moving upward. Prof. Burger’s analyses shows, however, that exports have generally never fulfil this role.

Over and above the identification of the drivers of the South African business cycle, Prof. Burger’s analysis also investigated the volatility of the business cycle.

When the periods 1976-1994 and 1994-2006 are compared, the analysis shows that the volatility of the business cycle has reduced since 1994 with more than half. The reduction in volatility can be traced to the reduction in the volatility of household consumption (especially durables and services), as well as a reduction in the volatility of investment in machinery, non-residential buildings and transport equipment. The last three coincide with the general reduction in the volatility of investment in the manufacturing sector. Investment in sectors such as electricity and transport (not to be confused with investment in transport equipment by various sectors) which are strongly dominated by the government, did not contribute to the decrease in volatility.

In his analysis, Prof. Burger supplies reasons for the reduction in volatility. One of the explanations is the reduction in the shocks affecting the economy – especially in the South African context. Another explanation is the application of an improved monetary policy by the South African Reserve Bank since the mid 1990’s. A third explanation is the better access to liquidity and credit since the mid 1990’s, which enables the better management of household finance and the absorption of financial shocks.

A further reason which contributed to the reduction in volatility in countries such as the United States of America’s business cycle is better inventory management. While the volatility of inventory in South Africa has also reduced there is, according to Prof. Burger, little proof that better inventory management contributed to the reduction in volatility of the GDP.

We use cookies to make interactions with our websites and services easy and meaningful. To better understand how they are used, read more about the UFS cookie policy. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this.

Accept